To be clear, you'd rather 1 or 2 execs of the baby murder factory on trial for a bit, rather than depleting the baby murder factories funds by what may end up being a substantial amount? While neither path leads to no dead babies, one leads to less dead babies than the other.
So too would I, but that's not on the table. It's one of the things I tell the loudest about when it comes to abortion.
Those with the energy and drive to protest push only for zero, which would be great, but it's not gonna happen. So instead of reducing the baby murder, they essentially keep it at the same high number.
TRIAGE!!! I agree that it's wrong to compromise with evil, but that's not what we're doing. Technically, since abortion is legal in some states for a week after birth, by fighting for a (un)"reasonable" number of say 4-4.5 months, we would be making the baby murderers compromise.
It is IMPERFECT, but let's save the babies we can, and after that, start pushing for no baby murders at all. At some point, those pushing for no abortions at all, and refusing to accept anything number over zero should probably be held responsible for some of the baby murders that could have been prevented.
This the problem with corporatism et all. People break the law. The corporation pays a fine.
This zero accountability is just modern-day feudalism, an upper nobility immune to the standards and laws of the peasants. Liberals blame this shit on "the evils of capitalism" when it's directly contrary to the very fundamentals of personal ownership. A capitalist is responsible for their own property, and their own actions. A corporation is just a border-less oligarchy where corruption and bribery are perfectly legal, while the actions of the elite are untouchable.
It is impossible not to tarnish them enough, with the blood of innocent babies.
wooosh
To be clear, you'd rather 1 or 2 execs of the baby murder factory on trial for a bit, rather than depleting the baby murder factories funds by what may end up being a substantial amount? While neither path leads to no dead babies, one leads to less dead babies than the other.
So too would I, but that's not on the table. It's one of the things I tell the loudest about when it comes to abortion.
Those with the energy and drive to protest push only for zero, which would be great, but it's not gonna happen. So instead of reducing the baby murder, they essentially keep it at the same high number.
TRIAGE!!! I agree that it's wrong to compromise with evil, but that's not what we're doing. Technically, since abortion is legal in some states for a week after birth, by fighting for a (un)"reasonable" number of say 4-4.5 months, we would be making the baby murderers compromise.
It is IMPERFECT, but let's save the babies we can, and after that, start pushing for no baby murders at all. At some point, those pushing for no abortions at all, and refusing to accept anything number over zero should probably be held responsible for some of the baby murders that could have been prevented.
This the problem with corporatism et all. People break the law. The corporation pays a fine.
This zero accountability is just modern-day feudalism, an upper nobility immune to the standards and laws of the peasants. Liberals blame this shit on "the evils of capitalism" when it's directly contrary to the very fundamentals of personal ownership. A capitalist is responsible for their own property, and their own actions. A corporation is just a border-less oligarchy where corruption and bribery are perfectly legal, while the actions of the elite are untouchable.