2 of 2

Then you simply don't know how to read. And you certainly don't know jack about Socialism.

Faked US and other Western Coronavirus figures are mostly faked by mislabeling deaths from other viruses (or even entire causes altogether) as WuFlu, in no small part because it's kind of hard even in Kaiser Wilhelm's New York City to completely conceal the number of people dying. So they have to stick closer to the numbers.

The CCP, on the other hand, are totalitarian socialists. So they not only can do everything the people faking the numbers over here can do, they can invent numbers out of whole cloth and quash anybody trying to gainsay their obviously bogus numbers.

And indeed, they kind of HAVE to because Socialism is such a failure they can't reliably get even passable estimates, so they largely BS them and then try to make policy based on them.

Simply put: The fraudsters in the West are mostly MIScounting actual deaths and lying about people investigating them like citizen journalists.

The fraudsters in the CCP don't have to count at all, and can simply adjust them with a wave of a magic wand and can shoot or imprison anybody they catch contradicting them.

Do I really have to explain to you how the latter "process" will almost invariably churn out numbers less related to reality than the former?

Apparently so.

Both are fake. Neither is trustworthy. Nowhere on earth is the Wuhan flu presenting as more dangerous than the regular flu.

A sleazy millionaire (like say Mr. and Mrs. Sanders) mis-filing his tax returns will give a fake figure.

So will a member of the "Nigerian Royalty" promising you millions of dollars in exchange for a down payment.

Does that mean that both figures are equally fake?

That's basically your logic.

No, my logic is that nowhere on earth has experienced the Wuhan flu as anything other than a regular old flu season, and therefore, China experienced nothing other than a regular old flu season.

Why would China be the only place hit hard?

Except even the hard core Dem liars aren't completely claiming that, only "largely." Hence why they haven't completely abolished normal flu deaths even as they've stolen lots from it.

If they'd completely abolished flu deaths, it would be even less believable than it is now.

Again, coming from someone who can't dispute basic DATES that contradict his pet theory and engages in CCP shill style whataboutism of "They're both fake! So why should we trust the corrupt but at least somewhat realistic numbers compared to those that obviously aren't counting anything but what comes out of XI's cloaca?"

I don't need to dispute the dates. Your timeline is a list of actions that China would have to have taken to spread this pandemic of hysteria. After all, if they had diligently locked down Wuhan, we would all have nothing to overreact to, as the supposed carriers of the virus would not be here amongst us, but back in Wuhan.

If they'd done that, there would be no basis for us to panic. And since panic was the goal from the outset, doing as you suggest would have been self-defeating.

How would diligently locking down Wuhan have resulted in worldwide panic? And since the Wuhan flu is harmless, how could China have started this thing with any goal other than causing a panic?

If your claims are so poor and deny similar things to what CCP shills deny (like Taiwan shouting there was a problem and being ignored), do you deserve more respect?

Taiwan was wrong though. There is no problem. It's the flu.

Ironically, China's planted advice that there was nothing to worry about was actually correct.