Ah, first I would like to take this opportunity to apologise for not making myself clear in my response to you. Perhaps I should have opened it with :
"I agree with what you have written, and see no conflict between out two points"
I believe it is possible from the response I am now responding to that my original response came off as more of "hey dummy!" than the honest "hey, you may have responded to the wrong guy". Given the amount you had written, it's cohesion, and the fact it was a pretty valid argument, I did NOT want it wasted on me if your actual target was someone else. I felt that might be a grave injustice, not just to yourself, but to whomever you sought to have a discussion with.
nah i was just trying to help spread some info about barr that i think casts him in a bad light because even though like everyone else i wanted to think he was 'our guy', i just seem to keep seeing sign after sign that he isn't. i'd love to be proven wrong, but i don't think he's going to do anything REAL (like what needs to be done) with regards to the IC spying on trump. so yeah i was just trying to spread some info (in the link) about what he's up to at this very moment (to my interpretation, disagreeing with trump on FISA and how powerful it should be).
Oh, I got it once you replied, the whole purpose of my second response was to express an apology for not having made myself clearer. I've found that when a miscommunication occurs, since I can not control the rest of the world, I must control myself and accept that in most cases the miscommunication is my fault.
It's not a perfect system, but one that I've found to be beneficial, as it helps me explain myself better in the future.
Ah, first I would like to take this opportunity to apologise for not making myself clear in my response to you. Perhaps I should have opened it with :
"I agree with what you have written, and see no conflict between out two points"
I believe it is possible from the response I am now responding to that my original response came off as more of "hey dummy!" than the honest "hey, you may have responded to the wrong guy". Given the amount you had written, it's cohesion, and the fact it was a pretty valid argument, I did NOT want it wasted on me if your actual target was someone else. I felt that might be a grave injustice, not just to yourself, but to whomever you sought to have a discussion with.
nah i was just trying to help spread some info about barr that i think casts him in a bad light because even though like everyone else i wanted to think he was 'our guy', i just seem to keep seeing sign after sign that he isn't. i'd love to be proven wrong, but i don't think he's going to do anything REAL (like what needs to be done) with regards to the IC spying on trump. so yeah i was just trying to spread some info (in the link) about what he's up to at this very moment (to my interpretation, disagreeing with trump on FISA and how powerful it should be).
Oh, I got it once you replied, the whole purpose of my second response was to express an apology for not having made myself clearer. I've found that when a miscommunication occurs, since I can not control the rest of the world, I must control myself and accept that in most cases the miscommunication is my fault.
It's not a perfect system, but one that I've found to be beneficial, as it helps me explain myself better in the future.
heh, i dont know man it is what it is