1364
Comments (39)
sorted by:
59
russian_bot6547 59 points ago +59 / -0

twitter fucked up bad with the fake fact checking..

34
GBA4ever 34 points ago +35 / -1

Yep. They aren’t a publishing platform. They are inserting opinion with their “fact checking” and subject to lawsuits.

6
ThisTrainHasNoBrakes 6 points ago +6 / -0

Well actually they ARE a publishing platform. They censor speech they don't like while allowing people to attack Trump 24/7.

They just don't want to be treated as such.

3
GBA4ever 3 points ago +3 / -0

they are editorializing

1
ThisTrainHasNoBrakes 1 point ago +1 / -0

That is correct but when given the millions of voices on the platform, is there any effective difference between the two? Every opinion is represented there so by choosing which are seen you might as well have written the words yourself. And as we know these puppets and Twitter coordinate their messaging.

If anything it is more sinister to do it this way because it appears to be authentic.

2
Tonightm01 2 points ago +2 / -0

The issue is they claim to be just a platform, that protects them. They need to be classed as a publisher.

Being a publisher means they can be sued if they censor political speech. Then they can be sued if they ban you for a political opinion.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
HiddenDekuScrub 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, what it really means is they can be held accountable for illegal activity that occurs on their site. If they aren't a "platform" then they basically "condone" everything they do not censor. And thus are liable.

24
blackestknight 24 points ago +24 / -0

What fact checking ? President was giving an informed opinion, they countered with CNN opinion.

No facts were actually checked. Meanwhile plenty of stories of mail voting fraud are coming out day after day.

4
Modern_Times 4 points ago +4 / -0

And this does not address their outright censorship and how many of their people doing the cencoring are foreign Nationals or algorithems created by foreign nationals.

1
russian_bot6547 1 point ago +1 / -0

'opinion checking' they should call it. hope social media gets spanked hard by the new EOs. these people deserve jail time for all the shit they've caused.

2
CitizenPlain 2 points ago +2 / -0

My body is ready!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
53
Staatssicherheit 53 points ago +53 / -0

There was no way the White House lawyers would have helped formulate this within 48 hours. They had this ready for a while now. Trump baited them into making this mistake.

23
Steelflite 23 points ago +23 / -0

Yeah, she said that they’ve had an EO drafted since early 2019. What’s that thing about 4D chess?

10
fasterth 10 points ago +11 / -1

h my God, maybe that's why he's been extra aggressive on twitter with obamagate and other things, to bait them into some type of censorship to hit back like never before.

8
Scroon 8 points ago +9 / -1

Classic chess (and business dealing). Feint with a secondary goal to bait the other side into a position where you can get your primary goal.

1
Trumplestiltskin9 1 point ago +1 / -0

Psycho Joe tweets.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Tonightm01 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed.

Trump will have sources that tell him what Twitter is up to behind closed doors.

40
Daveyboy58 40 points ago +40 / -0

We can hear it already, "But my FREEDOM OF SPEECH!!!" from everyone on the left. You know, the ones who are working overtime to remove the rights freedom of speech.

12
Aloha_Snackbar 12 points ago +12 / -0

Hawaiian Judge has entered the chat

8
raybiker73 8 points ago +8 / -0

I think I turned a corner today. I think it's time to start treating their rights with as much care and respect as they treat ours. Leftism is a tumor, and you don't just live with a tumor. You excise it or irradiate it until it dies, or until it kills you. No quarter.

4
NancyPeloci 4 points ago +4 / -0

You said it right there, MY freedom of speech. That's how they think, they want and they want you to not have. They need to feel superior.

1
Tonightm01 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good.

It's an issue that needs to be talked about. The problem is the left censors talk about it.

Trump is throwing it in their face so they will be forced to talk about it.

22
AtariArtist 22 points ago +22 / -0

Hoo hoo hoo!

Fun times ahead BITCHES!

20
Cardinal451 20 points ago +20 / -0

Chanel, expected to continue to look marvelous while reporting the truth.

8
iamjohnwick 8 points ago +8 / -0

Seriously......she is stunning

6
Salt-N-Pepe 6 points ago +6 / -0

Chanel No. 1

11
raybiker73 11 points ago +11 / -0

I was of mixed opinion on this at first. While I definitely think social media should be treated as publishers rather than platforms, I also respect their right to do what they want on their own playground. It's kind of a philosophical quandary.

Then I remembered, "Wait a minute. I was a member at r/The_Donald. Look at what they did to us when given the chance."

So now, I'm no longer of mixed opinion. Screw Twitter and all its shrieking cucks and douchebags. Burn it to the ground, then piss away the ashes.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
11
z89101 11 points ago +11 / -0

DNCCP SM is going to get Patriot kickback? The Karen/NPC cabal is going to fill their diapers for weeks!

7
ServerTowerofBabel 7 points ago +7 / -0

Will Freedom of Speech win over the Femdom of Speech?

5
ShortTheRip 5 points ago +5 / -0

Congress does nothing so it's up to the commander in chief

5
Pray4USA 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is going to be a long lawsuit you to the Supreme Court! Pelosi, Schiff, and Nadler will fight it.

4
craysins_NSFS 4 points ago +4 / -0

Oh my god this is truly an “it’s happening” moment... if true

2
sushicomp3d 2 points ago +2 / -0

Any chance this will let us push back on Reddit?

2
Usuqamadiq 2 points ago +2 / -0

I started adding this to my Facebook posts that might be considered "controversial":

(Hey Facebook admins and content thought police, removal of my content is a violation of 47 U.S.C. § 230 and the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in section 230 and is National Origin Discrimination pursuant to 42 USC § 2000a. It's also a violation of my US Constitutional First Ammendment right to free speech on a social media platform as stated in the 2017 US Supreme Court case, Packingham vs NC. You would be wise to cease and decist in your fraudulent censoring of US Citizens opinions and ideas before you face the full force of the US Federal Government and civil lawsuits under a renewed Trump Administration tired of your actions against conservatives or those whose ideology you disagree with.)

1
stormdraintrooper 1 point ago +1 / -0

Shit will be aflowin'