It only makes sense. This was an arrangement we made with social media companies to take shield them from retribution for taking down truly dangerous and vile material, such as child porn. They weren’t supposed to be fact checking political claims! Get fucked Jack!
Twitter wants to pick and choose what content is allowed on their site. Ok, they have that right as a private company.
That is called being a publisher. Companies that select what they want to publish, like book publishers, newspapers, blogs, or television stations, are responsible for the content that they publish. If it is defamatory, they must pay damages.
If twitter wants to act like a publisher, picking and choosing what viewpoint to endorse, then they should be liable for defamatory content on their site. If they don't want to be liable for that, then they should stop censoring views that they don't like. It's the way the law works for everyone else, and that's how it should work for large social media companies.
There will always be a few dudes in Silicon Valley that love Jack. Or, well, maybe not Jack, but love the access to Jack's girlfriend that Jack provides/enjoys.
That probably is in the dozens, so you know. He has a few "friends". Enough for someone to chat with while his girlfriend is, um, occupied.
All that sweet, sweet access to cucking Dorsey does not take away from the fact that every social-media-oriented startup in Silly Valley just went 'splat.
Pretty sure at least a couple of those budding CEOs (at least once they lose the next round of vulture-capital funding) are asking discreet questions about hit-men right about now...
I'm not even necessarily against the idea of fact-checking claims as long as you can do a good job of it in a nonpartisan matter. big tech proof they couldn't do that. They specifically targeted GOP claims and they often times lied about the fact checks in order to rate them . partnering with far-left Democrat propaganda organizations who have histories of lying such as PolitiFact The Washington Post the New York times and other Democrat propaganda fact-checkers
It's a no-win scenario for Jack. We don't like him because Twitter censors and "fact checks" conservative content. The left doesn't like him because he doesn't go far enough in his censorship and because once in a blue moon Twitter will censor really despicable far-left content. Then there's the "I hate the 1% or anyone with a lot of power" crowd who don't give him a pass.
If I were him I'd just not care and do whatever I wanted because I was wealthy and powerful....actually if I were him I'd reign in the political censorship and make Twitter a true platform and tell all the thin skinned users to deal with it.
It is always management's fault if the result is public. Full stop, no excuses. This is why the CxO crowd gets paid obscene amounts of money - because they (should!) have to eat obscene amounts of responsibility for their underlings' actions.
It only makes sense. This was an arrangement we made with social media companies to take shield them from retribution for taking down truly dangerous and vile material, such as child porn. They weren’t supposed to be fact checking political claims! Get fucked Jack!
Twitter wants to pick and choose what content is allowed on their site. Ok, they have that right as a private company.
That is called being a publisher. Companies that select what they want to publish, like book publishers, newspapers, blogs, or television stations, are responsible for the content that they publish. If it is defamatory, they must pay damages.
If twitter wants to act like a publisher, picking and choosing what viewpoint to endorse, then they should be liable for defamatory content on their site. If they don't want to be liable for that, then they should stop censoring views that they don't like. It's the way the law works for everyone else, and that's how it should work for large social media companies.
There will always be a few dudes in Silicon Valley that love Jack. Or, well, maybe not Jack, but love the access to Jack's girlfriend that Jack provides/enjoys.
That probably is in the dozens, so you know. He has a few "friends". Enough for someone to chat with while his girlfriend is, um, occupied.
All that sweet, sweet access to cucking Dorsey does not take away from the fact that every social-media-oriented startup in Silly Valley just went 'splat.
Pretty sure at least a couple of those budding CEOs (at least once they lose the next round of vulture-capital funding) are asking discreet questions about hit-men right about now...
I'm not even necessarily against the idea of fact-checking claims as long as you can do a good job of it in a nonpartisan matter. big tech proof they couldn't do that. They specifically targeted GOP claims and they often times lied about the fact checks in order to rate them . partnering with far-left Democrat propaganda organizations who have histories of lying such as PolitiFact The Washington Post the New York times and other Democrat propaganda fact-checkers
http://msmlies.com
It's a no-win scenario for Jack. We don't like him because Twitter censors and "fact checks" conservative content. The left doesn't like him because he doesn't go far enough in his censorship and because once in a blue moon Twitter will censor really despicable far-left content. Then there's the "I hate the 1% or anyone with a lot of power" crowd who don't give him a pass.
If I were him I'd just not care and do whatever I wanted because I was wealthy and powerful....actually if I were him I'd reign in the political censorship and make Twitter a true platform and tell all the thin skinned users to deal with it.
But.......
Jack is also a thin-skinned user, which is why he has fucked himself and the rest of Silicon Valley.
oof!
https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/TWTR?p=TWTR&.tsrc=fin-srch
If he doesn't stop censorship, he becomes a publisher and loses all profits by the thousand of lawsuits awaiting him
Is this another Ellen pao scenario? The next guy was way worse than her
It is always management's fault if the result is public. Full stop, no excuses. This is why the CxO crowd gets paid obscene amounts of money - because they (should!) have to eat obscene amounts of responsibility for their underlings' actions.
Doubtful. He’s got too much money and too much power. There will always be a large group of hangers on.
Post my tweet, bigot
I am Jack's quivering colon.
Big dick Mike Obama would like to entertain that
Maybe once Big Mike gets finished dicking down the Netflix board.
Look here Jack, push-up contest now behind the gym, if you don’t like it vote for the other Biden!
They can't even manage to keep the jailbait off the platforms but they're able to autoban "#learntocode"