You can't sue a publisher because they banned you from commenting.
Removing their Protection means you can sue them or threaten to sue them if they allow people to post information that isn't true and do not remove the information.
That's what James O'Keefe does but it still doesn't stop the papers he sues spewing out propoganda every day.
I would have been fine with this yesterday. After today, they engaged in an act of open defiance of the president during a national emergency. Burn their servers to the ground.
If the user's content is already being scanned then it makes the social media site's safe harbor argument moot. If they can suppress people for ideological reasons and consider it their duty to do so then they can suppress copyright infringement.
If you read it slowly without TDS or other pre-conceived notions, he's saying that looting is violent and criminal behavior that will escalate into shooting, NOT that the military will shoot looters. I don't know if he did that on purpose or not but it was a perfect trap for Twitter and they rushed to jump on it.
Agreed. This bullshit rhetoric that "violence never solves anything" is harmful to society. Violence is what keeps our society safe. Justly-enacted violence by police, military, and good men who happen to be in the wrong place at the right time.
We must teach our children that good things are worth fighting for.
Otherwise you get what's going on in Minnesota right now.
Watching the video, I was just as apalled by the bystanders who were witnessing an active murder, and did nothing. They were too scared of authority, so they let him die. The only way for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.
It isn't hard to understand that GEOTUS was saying that looting brings violence with it. This is fact - either someone will shoot to take possession of something, or someone will shoot to defend their homes/business/etc. Things must not be allowed to get to that, though I'm sure it already has.
The Whitehouse strategy team led Twitter right into this huge mistake, a perfect setup and Twitter took the bait.
The bias and agenda is becoming so visibly overt now that the amount of mental gymnastics MSM defenders need to do is off the charts
Now as people start to push the "looting/shooting" angle the average viewer is beginning to smell the rank stench of moral corruption coming from the "trusted media"
As things get closer to the election, the bad actors will get more desperate as they get boxed into the corner and they will inevitably hit a bullseye of mistakes, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate
We ALL know what POTUS meant. Anyone with common sense and rationale does. Of course the Leftist subverts dumbdown the statement to spin it in a negative narrative. The insidious part is that these subversives are not dumb at all. They know exactly what they're doing.
If the user's content is already being scanned then it makes the social media site's safe harbor argument moot. If they can suppress people for ideological reasons and consider it their duty to do so then they can suppress copyright infringement.
Looters are specifically mentioned in the tweet. I don't see the word "protesters" anywhere. Interesting...
They refuse to separate the two. Mao said terrorists are the fish and the civilians are the sea they swim in. Same principle.
More evidence for lawsuits against twitter for civil rights violations.
I would love to get a check for from Twitter.
Let's just make it enough it puts them out of business. Is 2 dollars for every American enough?
Make it $5, I’m headed to Wendy’s.
You can't sue a publisher because they banned you from commenting.
Removing their Protection means you can sue them or threaten to sue them if they allow people to post information that isn't true and do not remove the information.
That's what James O'Keefe does but it still doesn't stop the papers he sues spewing out propoganda every day.
I would have been fine with this yesterday. After today, they engaged in an act of open defiance of the president during a national emergency. Burn their servers to the ground.
They are incredibly stupid to challenge him on this. President Trump simply does not lose.
They still don’t understand. HE IS THE COMMANDER IN CHIEF OF THE MOST POWERFUL COUNTRY IN THE UNIVERSE. Yeah sure you’ll win.
The man terminated two political dynasties BEFORE becoming president. He not only wins, he leaves his opponents broken!
@jack must have the memory of a goldfish.
501 of the DMCA.
If the user's content is already being scanned then it makes the social media site's safe harbor argument moot. If they can suppress people for ideological reasons and consider it their duty to do so then they can suppress copyright infringement.
The comments make me lose all faith in humanity and the intelligence of the Human species.
I bet my left testicle that most of them are bots.
they are. Twitter is about as inorganic as it gets
Your first exposure to propaganda?
Take Jack to court!
If you read it slowly without TDS or other pre-conceived notions, he's saying that looting is violent and criminal behavior that will escalate into shooting, NOT that the military will shoot looters. I don't know if he did that on purpose or not but it was a perfect trap for Twitter and they rushed to jump on it.
I thought the exact same thing. Trump again playing 4D chess.
Violence is glorious when it is just.
Stop playing into their rhetorical traps. Defensive violence should be glorified.
Agreed. This bullshit rhetoric that "violence never solves anything" is harmful to society. Violence is what keeps our society safe. Justly-enacted violence by police, military, and good men who happen to be in the wrong place at the right time.
We must teach our children that good things are worth fighting for.
Otherwise you get what's going on in Minnesota right now.
Watching the video, I was just as apalled by the bystanders who were witnessing an active murder, and did nothing. They were too scared of authority, so they let him die. The only way for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.
It isn't hard to understand that GEOTUS was saying that looting brings violence with it. This is fact - either someone will shoot to take possession of something, or someone will shoot to defend their homes/business/etc. Things must not be allowed to get to that, though I'm sure it already has.
Time to start the lawsuits. If twitter is a publisher then BOMBS AWAAAAAAY
Prepare your anus, Jacky-boy!
Very. Stable. Genius.
I know I'm getting hard watching Jack tie the rope My Favorite President is feeding him.
Trump handled this perfectly.
The Whitehouse strategy team led Twitter right into this huge mistake, a perfect setup and Twitter took the bait.
The bias and agenda is becoming so visibly overt now that the amount of mental gymnastics MSM defenders need to do is off the charts
Now as people start to push the "looting/shooting" angle the average viewer is beginning to smell the rank stench of moral corruption coming from the "trusted media"
As things get closer to the election, the bad actors will get more desperate as they get boxed into the corner and they will inevitably hit a bullseye of mistakes, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate
The trap. You walked right in.
The EO says they've been working on this since May 2019. And they think he's doing all this on impulse !
We ALL know what POTUS meant. Anyone with common sense and rationale does. Of course the Leftist subverts dumbdown the statement to spin it in a negative narrative. The insidious part is that these subversives are not dumb at all. They know exactly what they're doing.
Interesting how this is a censorable offense, but not Kathy Griffin holding a severed Trump head isn’t.
501 of the DMCA.
If the user's content is already being scanned then it makes the social media site's safe harbor argument moot. If they can suppress people for ideological reasons and consider it their duty to do so then they can suppress copyright infringement.