It wasn't even nuanced. It was obvious what he meant imo. This was just another case of TDS sufferers taking everything Trump says in the worst way possible.
Yeah I think it shines light on why censorship is so insideous... When others decide how you should be interpreted (rather than your own intention) and regard their own wicked perception as fact, that's scary.
I agree. They specialize in pretzel logic. I believe their think tanks stay up at night or operate in shifts, trying to think of a "logical-sounding" way, to their followers anyway, to twist every single think the President or his followers say, to say it means something other than what it means. Like HRC's tweet today. The National Guard is brought in to stop the rioting & looting, before they destroy the city for no good reason. She says the President is "calling for violence against American citizens". And what would she do? The Left NEVER, EVER has a suggestion to help any situation, just criticism.
He's not apologizing, he's explaining. nowhere does he say, "alright national guard, as soon as they start stealing some TV start killing those black people"
He's saying action a has a consequence of B. Every action has a reaction. Which is why you want to deploy the national guard, especially when people are so angry at the police.
RIght? Yeah I think I'm just going to start killing black people a few months before election. The fact that lefties can believe Trump (or anyone) would be that fucking stupid is pure projection.
He's right, he let's the Communists assume he's wrong and then he points out why he's right. He gives them every opportunity to get it right, and they bash themselves in the head over and over. He's trying as hard as he can to teach people how to win.
And it's entirely possible that he is the first one since the early 1800's. THis is what government is supposed to care about and I have just never seen that in my life.
I called it. Trump keeps his language purposely ambiguous to cause a firestorm
That’s what I told my wife. He nuanced it so as to cause Twitter fools to overreact.
It wasn't even nuanced. It was obvious what he meant imo. This was just another case of TDS sufferers taking everything Trump says in the worst way possible.
Riots lead to violence? Pure shock I say!
Absolute scandal!!
Protests sir, barely unruly
Yeah I think it shines light on why censorship is so insideous... When others decide how you should be interpreted (rather than your own intention) and regard their own wicked perception as fact, that's scary.
I agree. They specialize in pretzel logic. I believe their think tanks stay up at night or operate in shifts, trying to think of a "logical-sounding" way, to their followers anyway, to twist every single think the President or his followers say, to say it means something other than what it means. Like HRC's tweet today. The National Guard is brought in to stop the rioting & looting, before they destroy the city for no good reason. She says the President is "calling for violence against American citizens". And what would she do? The Left NEVER, EVER has a suggestion to help any situation, just criticism.
Like seth rich? Murderous cunt
Agreed. People who thought he meant that they are going to start shooting the looters are just insane.
Um....I sort of think looters SHOULD be shot....
But I'm not suggesting that's what Prez said...or what he meant.
But MSNBC told me that phrase was a racist dog whistle? They wouldn't lie to me, would they?
What did muh Twitter fact check say?
He's not apologizing, he's explaining. nowhere does he say, "alright national guard, as soon as they start stealing some TV start killing those black people"
He's saying action a has a consequence of B. Every action has a reaction. Which is why you want to deploy the national guard, especially when people are so angry at the police.
RIght? Yeah I think I'm just going to start killing black people a few months before election. The fact that lefties can believe Trump (or anyone) would be that fucking stupid is pure projection.
They always project blame for the things they do.
Meanwhile the left will defend the looters. Wonder what percentage of them vote?
110% thanks to ballot harvesting. Haven't you been keeping up? /s
He's right, he let's the Communists assume he's wrong and then he points out why he's right. He gives them every opportunity to get it right, and they bash themselves in the head over and over. He's trying as hard as he can to teach people how to win.
He is very easily understood by anyone who accepts that he actually cares about his countrymen.
And it's entirely possible that he is the first one since the early 1800's. THis is what government is supposed to care about and I have just never seen that in my life.
Teddy roosevelt.
And reagan. And although he was silly, Carter.