It’s coming. The Insurrection Act of 1807, amended in 2007, gives POTUS the right to deploy US regular troops to regain order.
It states
“ Under this act, the President may also deploy troops as a police force during a natural disaster, epidemic, serious public health emergency, terrorist attack, or other condition, when the President determines that the authorities of the state are incapable of maintaining public order”
The bill also modified Sec. 334 of the Insurrection Act, giving the President authority to order the dispersal of either insurgents or "those obstructing the enforcement of the laws."
Here's the problem that people here don't seem to understand, it's politically expedient for trump to let blue cities burn themselves down then go "see this is the racial tension you get when you vote democrat" and pin this all on them.
He may deploy some MP's to Minnesota for example, but most of the states will be on their own unless this gets as bad.
There is no virtue is “letting it calm down”. We are already past the point where there NEEDS to be a swift and powerful response to the rioting. If these fuckers don’t get stomped into the ground for what they’ve done they will keep doing it.
Going to need troops literally nationwide over a dozen major cities and rising are in chaos with police overwhelmed. Thanks to incompetence or deliberate actions by state and local Governments. National Guard is proving widely ineffective.
They were called back after the morning of the 4th night (follwing the riots of the 3rd). They were in mass deployment (according to the live-streams I was watching) around sunrise / 4:30 am.
Obviously the cuck gov and the mayor didn't think they'd need them again. They essentially fucked around with them aka - didn't let them do their job for the 4th night.
My feeling is that if the mayor of Minneapolis actually took charge and didn’t let them run over there city and burn it to the ground over the course of two days you wouldn’t have seen the spread as much. He basically gave the green light for this.
They’ll either need to enact the insurrection act of 1807 which gives clearance to deploy Military in domestic operations to restore order and put down riots, revolts, rebellions, and other unlawful behavior.
Or declare a state of Martial Law which essentially means Military is in charge and Local and State Governments are sidelined for the duration of the deceleration.
They should tag anyone breaking laws for investigation and criminal prosecution. Publish their voting records as well so we can see the ANTIFA and left led "revolution" for what it is.
This is not new. The left became violent in the 60s and 70s as well. They calmed down then got radical again.
The Kent State shooting, although offensive, brought some people to the understanding that violence was not the answer. I was there for both sets of the earlier riots. I have a feeling that we will have at least 1 violent clash soon. Hope it's just old age and knowing what SNAFU means.
Honestly I think that's what the left is trying to do. They are trying to rile people up, to get them so angry, that they try something that forces the Whitehouse to kill someone. Because the media will deliberately misframe it, and use it as fuel to rile up even more, kind of like 'Hate Week' from 1984, where the state (in this case leftist media) tries to hype up the hatred within the populace for whoever the then declared enemy of the state is (Trump)
Won't work. Sane people who represent the majority of voters know that the WH is representative of national security. Seeing what happened to Minneapolis - it's obvious what not protecting it would do.
In fact, if you look at the outcome of all the riots of 1968 - you ended up with Nixon. It's a doomed strategy from the get-go.
They might not shoot to kill in cities, but they're damn sure going to shoot to kill at the Whitehouse. If a mob crosses that fence, they'll be mowed down. They only don't mow people down in individual scenario's, because security can generally handle them. The WH might be built like a fortress, but with a mob, no chances would be taken. They might have some men come out with weapons drawn to try to arrest them, but if they keep coming, there's no way they don't open fire. Part of the justification is that if they overrun security, they could get hold of weapons. If they get hold of military grade weapons, they become even more dangerous. Would not be allowed to happen. It would be no different than going for a cops gun.
“All we have left of Topher is his mask, with rugrats cartoons on it that he wore ironically, and his nose rings. Everything Else just turned to pink mist after he threw that bottle of fire away from His friends.”
While other parts of the country might seem like Chicago 68, The White house is capable of defending against a serious military force. "protesters" would be cannon fodder.
Seriously - you aren't aware of the nationwide riots after MLK was assassinated - the ones that left parts of DC still uninhabited to this day.
M'kay then.
'ya thought so' works better if you have an ounce of historical data in your brain. Just a little tip. You should check out Reddit - totally your scene.
"I heard y'all wanted to fuck around."
....and find out.
I wanna see what a claymore mine can do to a wave of "protesters."
It’s coming. The Insurrection Act of 1807, amended in 2007, gives POTUS the right to deploy US regular troops to regain order.
It states “ Under this act, the President may also deploy troops as a police force during a natural disaster, epidemic, serious public health emergency, terrorist attack, or other condition, when the President determines that the authorities of the state are incapable of maintaining public order”
The bill also modified Sec. 334 of the Insurrection Act, giving the President authority to order the dispersal of either insurgents or "those obstructing the enforcement of the laws."
Nah, it'll be far longer than this.
Here's the problem that people here don't seem to understand, it's politically expedient for trump to let blue cities burn themselves down then go "see this is the racial tension you get when you vote democrat" and pin this all on them.
He may deploy some MP's to Minnesota for example, but most of the states will be on their own unless this gets as bad.
There is no virtue is “letting it calm down”. We are already past the point where there NEEDS to be a swift and powerful response to the rioting. If these fuckers don’t get stomped into the ground for what they’ve done they will keep doing it.
Or just pull up to where ballsack eyes George Soros is. That will save a lot of time.
And his sons
Based but should be *his wife's sons.
DC is usually such a boring assignment. I wouldn't mess with these soldiers- they'll probably fuck you up just for something to do.
Going to need troops literally nationwide over a dozen major cities and rising are in chaos with police overwhelmed. Thanks to incompetence or deliberate actions by state and local Governments. National Guard is proving widely ineffective.
National Guard was fucked around with in MN by the antifa-dnc overlords. With predictable results.
When? The last couple days they either retreated or were no shows.
They were called back after the morning of the 4th night (follwing the riots of the 3rd). They were in mass deployment (according to the live-streams I was watching) around sunrise / 4:30 am.
Obviously the cuck gov and the mayor didn't think they'd need them again. They essentially fucked around with them aka - didn't let them do their job for the 4th night.
My feeling is that if the mayor of Minneapolis actually took charge and didn’t let them run over there city and burn it to the ground over the course of two days you wouldn’t have seen the spread as much. He basically gave the green light for this.
If this is coordinated, which it seems to be, I'm guessing they probably decided to start with Minneapolis because they knew it would be allowed.
One "fuck around and find out" and these paid agitators will reconsider their $12/hr.
What options does the federal government have in those cities, legally? How long are they going to let this go on?
They’ll either need to enact the insurrection act of 1807 which gives clearance to deploy Military in domestic operations to restore order and put down riots, revolts, rebellions, and other unlawful behavior.
Or declare a state of Martial Law which essentially means Military is in charge and Local and State Governments are sidelined for the duration of the deceleration.
That’s exactly what’s coming
Before or after the rioters torch and loot historic landmarks, and businesses?
I don’t know what he’s waiting for. But it’s clear Local and State Governments in several areas at least are unwilling or unable to contain this.
You don't have many bystanders at a violent protest, if they are dumb enough to be out enjoying the smoke filled air, we won't miss them.
The gov in Seattle is sending in two hundred NG and they are unarmed.
200
Un
Armed
They are going to get their asses kicked.
By who? Not the candy ass ANIFA, this isn't swing your bike lock and run away, these are American National Guard units - attack at your peril.
They sent 200 unarmed National Guardsmen. Unarmed. You need weapons to fight back. The Guardsmen were given none.
And since it’s a liberal craphole. Likely a highly restricted ROE bound up in Red Tape.
MAGA night at the White House boys!!!
They should tag anyone breaking laws for investigation and criminal prosecution. Publish their voting records as well so we can see the ANTIFA and left led "revolution" for what it is.
This is not new. The left became violent in the 60s and 70s as well. They calmed down then got radical again.
Good. I am hoping that they can take down Antifa and some of the more violent far left groups. At least their funding and organization.
The Kent State shooting, although offensive, brought some people to the understanding that violence was not the answer. I was there for both sets of the earlier riots. I have a feeling that we will have at least 1 violent clash soon. Hope it's just old age and knowing what SNAFU means.
Anitfa heads go pop pop pop.
Commies tryin hard to destroy everything before november.
Trying to avoid violence. The Secret Service and others could easily protect the White House.
Useless...Unless they are willing to shoot to kill...
those armaments are nothing but toys
You think those rooftop snipers on the WH are just for decoration?
That's called national security. Go ahead and test them. I dare you. I double dog dare you. But wait until I get my popcorn finished - nearly ready.
Honestly I think that's what the left is trying to do. They are trying to rile people up, to get them so angry, that they try something that forces the Whitehouse to kill someone. Because the media will deliberately misframe it, and use it as fuel to rile up even more, kind of like 'Hate Week' from 1984, where the state (in this case leftist media) tries to hype up the hatred within the populace for whoever the then declared enemy of the state is (Trump)
Won't work. Sane people who represent the majority of voters know that the WH is representative of national security. Seeing what happened to Minneapolis - it's obvious what not protecting it would do.
In fact, if you look at the outcome of all the riots of 1968 - you ended up with Nixon. It's a doomed strategy from the get-go.
I hope you're right. This shit is getting bananas.
They might not shoot to kill in cities, but they're damn sure going to shoot to kill at the Whitehouse. If a mob crosses that fence, they'll be mowed down. They only don't mow people down in individual scenario's, because security can generally handle them. The WH might be built like a fortress, but with a mob, no chances would be taken. They might have some men come out with weapons drawn to try to arrest them, but if they keep coming, there's no way they don't open fire. Part of the justification is that if they overrun security, they could get hold of weapons. If they get hold of military grade weapons, they become even more dangerous. Would not be allowed to happen. It would be no different than going for a cops gun.
Oorah.
Hopefully armed
“All we have left of Topher is his mask, with rugrats cartoons on it that he wore ironically, and his nose rings. Everything Else just turned to pink mist after he threw that bottle of fire away from His friends.”
Just fully prosecute without bail we want the leaders
Six star wanted level
What? Is this real threat?
It didn't in Chicago 1968. Or in LA 1992.
Get a grip.
While other parts of the country might seem like Chicago 68, The White house is capable of defending against a serious military force. "protesters" would be cannon fodder.
Seriously - you aren't aware of the nationwide riots after MLK was assassinated - the ones that left parts of DC still uninhabited to this day.
M'kay then.
'ya thought so' works better if you have an ounce of historical data in your brain. Just a little tip. You should check out Reddit - totally your scene.
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_assassination_riots)
I guess we’ll need to shoot more than just one then