Honestly I think that's what the left is trying to do. They are trying to rile people up, to get them so angry, that they try something that forces the Whitehouse to kill someone. Because the media will deliberately misframe it, and use it as fuel to rile up even more, kind of like 'Hate Week' from 1984, where the state (in this case leftist media) tries to hype up the hatred within the populace for whoever the then declared enemy of the state is (Trump)
Won't work. Sane people who represent the majority of voters know that the WH is representative of national security. Seeing what happened to Minneapolis - it's obvious what not protecting it would do.
In fact, if you look at the outcome of all the riots of 1968 - you ended up with Nixon. It's a doomed strategy from the get-go.
They might not shoot to kill in cities, but they're damn sure going to shoot to kill at the Whitehouse. If a mob crosses that fence, they'll be mowed down. They only don't mow people down in individual scenario's, because security can generally handle them. The WH might be built like a fortress, but with a mob, no chances would be taken. They might have some men come out with weapons drawn to try to arrest them, but if they keep coming, there's no way they don't open fire. Part of the justification is that if they overrun security, they could get hold of weapons. If they get hold of military grade weapons, they become even more dangerous. Would not be allowed to happen. It would be no different than going for a cops gun.
Useless...Unless they are willing to shoot to kill...
those armaments are nothing but toys
You think those rooftop snipers on the WH are just for decoration?
That's called national security. Go ahead and test them. I dare you. I double dog dare you. But wait until I get my popcorn finished - nearly ready.
Honestly I think that's what the left is trying to do. They are trying to rile people up, to get them so angry, that they try something that forces the Whitehouse to kill someone. Because the media will deliberately misframe it, and use it as fuel to rile up even more, kind of like 'Hate Week' from 1984, where the state (in this case leftist media) tries to hype up the hatred within the populace for whoever the then declared enemy of the state is (Trump)
Won't work. Sane people who represent the majority of voters know that the WH is representative of national security. Seeing what happened to Minneapolis - it's obvious what not protecting it would do.
In fact, if you look at the outcome of all the riots of 1968 - you ended up with Nixon. It's a doomed strategy from the get-go.
I hope you're right. This shit is getting bananas.
They might not shoot to kill in cities, but they're damn sure going to shoot to kill at the Whitehouse. If a mob crosses that fence, they'll be mowed down. They only don't mow people down in individual scenario's, because security can generally handle them. The WH might be built like a fortress, but with a mob, no chances would be taken. They might have some men come out with weapons drawn to try to arrest them, but if they keep coming, there's no way they don't open fire. Part of the justification is that if they overrun security, they could get hold of weapons. If they get hold of military grade weapons, they become even more dangerous. Would not be allowed to happen. It would be no different than going for a cops gun.