posted ago by DL535
+302 / -0
This may depend on a few legal issues:
- Does providing bail constitute "support"
- If the bail comes from an individual as opposed to the campaign officially, does it count as "support"
- I assume action to support ANTIFA pre the executive order is legal (which is absurd but there you go), so if Biden's people have any brains (doubtful) they would back off now which would remove their legal jeopardy.
But still despite these caveats, holy s*** people. We are clearly on very dangerous ground here, this is really close to DJT declaring his major political opposition to be traitors.
Imma go to the gun range and practice now, suggest you do the same.
This may depend on a few legal issues:
1) Does providing bail constitute "support"
2) If the bail comes from an individual as opposed to the campaign officially, does it count as "support"
3) I assume action to support ANTIFA pre the executive order is legal (which is absurd but there you go), so if Biden's people have any brains (doubtful) they would back off now which would remove their legal jeopardy.
But still despite these caveats, holy s*** people. We are clearly on very dangerous ground here, this is really close to DJT declaring his major political opposition to be traitors.
Imma go to the gun range and practice now, suggest you do the same.
Well, they are traitors.
Whats wrong with GEOTUS telling the truth?
Indirectly, yes. But, the Biden folks said they oppose cash bonds for low-income people because it’s unfair. However, the selectively, I think, only provided bail for the protestors.
My first Wife bailed me out of jail when I was framed for a PI..... that did not make her guilty of anything. Ahem.
You are designated a terrorist organization? Because if not, your analogy was idiotic.
Previous American Administrations did label me a terrorist, yes, for numerous status qualities assigned to my humble self. They include... Vet...Bible thumper...clinger... VRWC member...Oath Keeper... Honest Taxpayer...Redneck...gun owner...business owner...TEA Partier.
Funny way you have of asking questions, and thanks for offering up the veiled attempt at insult, it is appreciated.
https://i.maga.host/1nQFOGr.jpeg
You may raise a valid point in that providing bail for another individual is not itself unlawful, however note that USC prevents material support to terrorism:
https://codes.findlaw.com/us/title-18-crimes-and-criminal-procedure/18-usc-sect-2339a.html
The statute does not mention bail money, but a lawyer could argue that bail is a form of financial support. There are lots of laws on terrorism so maybe a lawyer could comment.
Yeah, I know, but our law says you gotta let people make bail so...claim you're an illegal alien trans/pregnant handicapped illiterate victim and they have to let you bail.
Then it's the government bailing you, so no connection between bail and accessory.
But you are correct, I was being funny at first then the playa killed muh buzz.
https://i.maga.host/u8TqvrR.jpg