Civil war is coming. You are IN DENIAL. Governors of blue states and mayors of blue cities are engaging in insurrection by endorsing these riots and deliberately pulling back all law enforcement. The ANTIFA coordinators know exactly where to riot with no pushback. This is the prequel to acts of actual successionist movements once Trump wins re-election.
You aint seen nothing yet, and its all so obvious and predictable.
Then you better do something to stop it? This is EXACTLY how civil war starts. Yes I agree this is what the rest of the world wants and has always wanted. It is in fact how all of their empires crumbled, because they never cut out the rot from within. People have recognized this coming collapse for decades but they have been labeled as fringed and ignored for the sake of comfort and appeasement. You either remove the fake Americans that are your neighbors or enjoy the break of the "united" states. No alternative.
Civil war is just a wet dream from the psycho leftists. #1 The military would never be divided. #2 there is a side with all the guns and the other side has the occasional brick and soy lattes.
and the other side has the occasional brick and soy lattes.
That's not true and I'm not sure if you're being hyperbolic or ignorant of the situation.
For others that believe this BS:
Lots of BLM members have black rifles. And there's literally a leftist gun owners subreddit with a LOT of subscribers.
The left DOES HAVE GUNS. Nowhere near as many as the right, but that point is moot.
Not being hyperbolic but not speaking in absolutes either.
The left DOES HAVE GUNS
Really? Wow! Thanks for that technically correct wisdom. smh.
First of all the people looting are a small % of the population and they are not normally armed and the sure in the hell do not have firearm discipline. And these are the crazies we have to worry about in any "civil war". You think your normal lefty will engage? Nope.
Most Any leftest gun owner with any sense of firearm discipline will most likely not be one to worry about. How many gunshop owners are leftest? How many go to gun ranges? Dude commons sense will tell you the ration is pretty heavily weighted.
Also, and most importantly this was a secondary point to my original comment.
It's not up to you. Communists attacking us from within is already happening. You're just burying your head in the sand and helping them by denying it. Obama was a communist and this is the fundamental transformation of America he spoke of. It's all organized, it's all a Maoist playbook, it's all happening. Wake the fuck up.
These assfuck leftists have no idea what war actually entails.
I can guarantee the ilk we are dealing with, believe they can sit in their comfy homes and let others do the hard work.
They need to reread the actual Civil War. When the battalions came through, the options were pretty limited, Join, Die, but no matter what, get the fuck out of that home.
My wife was a hard sell given we have young Grandchildren often in house. Gun safety is high on the list of our priorities. After watching the violence this weekend and watching it spread convinced us that now is the time.
We have a Glock 9mm, I've never shot it, I was pregnant when we got it and although I took a safety training class I never actually went into the shooting range and have just never gotten around to it. My husband obviously did though. I now want to get one for myself and get my CCW, any recommendations? My husband says a revolver rather than a semi-auto. I'm wondering about recoil. Also, on a side note how does your safe work? we have one but it eats batteries so we are thinking about getting a new one.
If you're not going to take the time to really practice, a revolver is your best option. Its just point and pull trigger, if it doesn't go off, pull trigger again until it does. You don't want to have to remember to take a safety off in a bad situation, or how to change a magazine, or clear a misfire. The 5 pound trigger pull makes it very difficult for a child to accidentally shoot. A simple bio metric safe by your nightstand makes it safe and accessible.
My wife has the S&W 5 shot 38 special, with hidden hammer. It's small and lightweight, the recoil is minimal. Its not the largest caliber but it will do the trick if its needed.
A revolver is going to have more recoil and be a little harder to hit your target without practice.
To get a CCW, you are going to have to show some proficiency with whatever firearm you are wishing to conceal.
I’ve heard this argument that women should use revolvers more than once. I think it’s because they think a revolver is “idiot-proof.”
The truth is, if you plan on protecting yourself with a firearm, you should practice and become at least somewhat comfortable with whichever type you plan to use. It could make all the difference if you are ever forced into a situation where you have to protect yourself.
Clearing a malfunction or jam is usually as simple a knowing how to rack your firearm. While yes, a revolver is as simple as pulling the trigger or pulling the hammer back and then pulling the trigger, you might be more comfortable with how a compact 9mm fires. Also, while a double action fire on a revolver is harder to pull the trigger, once the hammer is cocked, it’s much easier to pull. And if a kid were to figure out how to pull the hammer back, don’t think they wouldn’t be able to pull the trigger easily.
It’s never too late to go to a range and try a couple different firearms out and see what you feel more comfortable firing.
The best choice is going to be whatever you feel most comfortable using.
Very smooth and accurate. Only downside is I am a small female and have trouble with keeping it from imprinting. I have one holster that works ok, but it is too hot for summer. .357 +P will take out a bear and I wear it when I hike in the mountains. I love it. I shot my friend's semit auto Glock and it was fabulous as well. I like iron sights, but and considering a laser sight for deterrence and night use.
My safe is plugged into an outlet next to our bed and has battery backup and key backup. It reads my fingerprint. I have a revolved for CCW and I love it, unbelievably smooth with little recoil and no extra gadgets, It is an LCR https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruger_LCR I have a .357 that takes +P ammo which will take out a bear. I wear it when I hike in the mountains. You will see it is single action and has nothing that snags. My biggest issue is finding good ways to conceal, the one I found that sort of works is too hot for summer. I am thinking about getting a semi auto that imprints less. I shot my friend's Glock and it was wonderful. The thing about a revolver is you can not shoot for years, pick it up, and just use it. I test shot the LCR first and cannot believe how little kick and how accurate it is for such a little thing, I have no idea how they managed to do it. I highly recommend it.
Better to have it and not need it then need it and not have it at all.
Take a couple of classes and if you have a gun friend, let them spend time with you, an unloaded weapon and a few snap caps so you can learn how they work.
It's a few basic fundamentals and you could then at least know to make any gun safe. And by that I mean unloading and clearing a gun, which all gun owners should know
POTUS needs to arrest Chuck, Nancy, Pelosi and Soros and either Kagan or Sotomayor and hold them in a cell with explicit instructions that if any conservative official or journalist is murdered, they will all get it too.
The cost to the left needs to be a thousand times greater.
There's also the issue of what can be done without generating backlash by the voters and undermine the very positions we are trying to take.
What I suggested would obviously not fall in any legal guidelines unless POTUS declared an insurrection and then declared that such people as Pelosi were responsible in some way. Even then, he might have to pass an EO allowing for a harsh legal penalty, and pass it before arresting them.
Doing any of this, under current circumstances would backfire. But thinking along those lines, in how such people and their causes could be held accountable is not. For example, POTUS could pass an EO requiring that all electronic records of officials (police chiefs, mayors, governors, Congress) and their direct aides and employees during the riots must be preserved and subject to a lawful warrant must be disclosed if there is evidence of negligence or dereliction of duty. He could then announce that there will likely be federal hearings by August on the people who should have acted but didn't. Pelosi and many of the others would be likely be out of office if such dereliction of duty was shown.
Brainstorming among people trying to find solutions - even if the initial ideas are seemingly useless can sometimes trigger other ideas that are useful and can be implemented. The human brain can at times remarkably connect seemingly irrelevant ideas and turn them into solutions.
I'm not necessarily a Cassandra Fairbanks fan, or not a fan, ..she's okay, ..but if you don't know who she is, you must live under a rock, only consume Fake News, and never look into independent media, or you would have at least heard of her. ...Or do you know who she is, and you are trying to insult her by pretending that you do not? I'm confused.
Well, I honestly never heard of her. I looked her up on DDG, and interestingly, in the search results for the wikipedia page, it says,
"Cassandra Fairbanks is an American journalist and Racist. She is best known for 'Find the Dancing Man,' her successful 2015 social media campaign against fat shaming, and for being a white supremacist."
But upon going to the page, it says, "Cassandra Fairbanks is an American journalist and activist."
I'm guessing someone edited the metadata? I'm not a website expert so dunno. But her page is a mess. She was originally pretty lefty, but turned righty and supported GEOTUS?
Civil war is coming as no one should have to deal with this
Glad she was armed
Civil war is coming. You are IN DENIAL. Governors of blue states and mayors of blue cities are engaging in insurrection by endorsing these riots and deliberately pulling back all law enforcement. The ANTIFA coordinators know exactly where to riot with no pushback. This is the prequel to acts of actual successionist movements once Trump wins re-election.
You aint seen nothing yet, and its all so obvious and predictable.
I agree thats why I said no one should have to deal with this
And they have been undermining the USA for years
Then you better do something to stop it? This is EXACTLY how civil war starts. Yes I agree this is what the rest of the world wants and has always wanted. It is in fact how all of their empires crumbled, because they never cut out the rot from within. People have recognized this coming collapse for decades but they have been labeled as fringed and ignored for the sake of comfort and appeasement. You either remove the fake Americans that are your neighbors or enjoy the break of the "united" states. No alternative.
Civil war is just a wet dream from the psycho leftists. #1 The military would never be divided. #2 there is a side with all the guns and the other side has the occasional brick and soy lattes.
That's not true and I'm not sure if you're being hyperbolic or ignorant of the situation.
For others that believe this BS:
Lots of BLM members have black rifles. And there's literally a leftist gun owners subreddit with a LOT of subscribers.
The left DOES HAVE GUNS. Nowhere near as many as the right, but that point is moot.
https://www.reddit.com/r/liberalgunowners/
https://theohiostar.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Black-Panthers-at-Ga-polling-places_840x480.jpg
https://s.hdnux.com/photos/75/33/57/16104399/7/920x920.jpg
https://www.abc.net.au/news/image/9303766-3x2-940x627.jpg
Sure they look like a bunch of faggots... but fags bullets will kill you just the same.
Not being hyperbolic but not speaking in absolutes either.
Really? Wow! Thanks for that technically correct wisdom. smh.
First of all the people looting are a small % of the population and they are not normally armed and the sure in the hell do not have firearm discipline. And these are the crazies we have to worry about in any "civil war". You think your normal lefty will engage? Nope.
Most Any leftest gun owner with any sense of firearm discipline will most likely not be one to worry about. How many gunshop owners are leftest? How many go to gun ranges? Dude commons sense will tell you the ration is pretty heavily weighted.
Also, and most importantly this was a secondary point to my original comment.
It's not up to you. Communists attacking us from within is already happening. You're just burying your head in the sand and helping them by denying it. Obama was a communist and this is the fundamental transformation of America he spoke of. It's all organized, it's all a Maoist playbook, it's all happening. Wake the fuck up.
Less civil war and more like eliminating cockroaches from your home.
Problem is this is not over. Roaches are hard to kill
Not if you drop them out a helicopter over the middle of the ocean.
The control of the armed people on the right is admirable
I can guarantee the ilk we are dealing with, believe they can sit in their comfy homes and let others do the hard work.
They need to reread the actual Civil War. When the battalions came through, the options were pretty limited, Join, Die, but no matter what, get the fuck out of that home.
If they did that shit to my neighbors I'd shoot them from concealment.
You think if her house was torched it wouldn't spread? Everyone needs to stick together or else we will fall.
Her neighbors saw what was happening and did nothing?
Fucking pussies.
I live in a state that I am allowed to shoot someone even if they are on my neighbor's property, if they are up to no good.
Also have a dozen LEOs in this community.
I'm fairly certain we aren't going to have any problems here.
I’ve never been too tempted to have a gun, though I’ve always fully supported the 2A, but even I’m doing some research this morning...
My wife was a hard sell given we have young Grandchildren often in house. Gun safety is high on the list of our priorities. After watching the violence this weekend and watching it spread convinced us that now is the time.
I like my biometric safe, works great
We have a Glock 9mm, I've never shot it, I was pregnant when we got it and although I took a safety training class I never actually went into the shooting range and have just never gotten around to it. My husband obviously did though. I now want to get one for myself and get my CCW, any recommendations? My husband says a revolver rather than a semi-auto. I'm wondering about recoil. Also, on a side note how does your safe work? we have one but it eats batteries so we are thinking about getting a new one.
If you're not going to take the time to really practice, a revolver is your best option. Its just point and pull trigger, if it doesn't go off, pull trigger again until it does. You don't want to have to remember to take a safety off in a bad situation, or how to change a magazine, or clear a misfire. The 5 pound trigger pull makes it very difficult for a child to accidentally shoot. A simple bio metric safe by your nightstand makes it safe and accessible.
My wife has the S&W 5 shot 38 special, with hidden hammer. It's small and lightweight, the recoil is minimal. Its not the largest caliber but it will do the trick if its needed.
Thanks, I'll take a look at that
A revolver is going to have more recoil and be a little harder to hit your target without practice.
To get a CCW, you are going to have to show some proficiency with whatever firearm you are wishing to conceal.
I’ve heard this argument that women should use revolvers more than once. I think it’s because they think a revolver is “idiot-proof.”
The truth is, if you plan on protecting yourself with a firearm, you should practice and become at least somewhat comfortable with whichever type you plan to use. It could make all the difference if you are ever forced into a situation where you have to protect yourself.
Clearing a malfunction or jam is usually as simple a knowing how to rack your firearm. While yes, a revolver is as simple as pulling the trigger or pulling the hammer back and then pulling the trigger, you might be more comfortable with how a compact 9mm fires. Also, while a double action fire on a revolver is harder to pull the trigger, once the hammer is cocked, it’s much easier to pull. And if a kid were to figure out how to pull the hammer back, don’t think they wouldn’t be able to pull the trigger easily.
It’s never too late to go to a range and try a couple different firearms out and see what you feel more comfortable firing.
The best choice is going to be whatever you feel most comfortable using.
Looks like no, Ruger LCR .357 that takes +P https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruger_LCR
Very smooth and accurate. Only downside is I am a small female and have trouble with keeping it from imprinting. I have one holster that works ok, but it is too hot for summer. .357 +P will take out a bear and I wear it when I hike in the mountains. I love it. I shot my friend's semit auto Glock and it was fabulous as well. I like iron sights, but and considering a laser sight for deterrence and night use.
For serious defense I want a tactical shotgun.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7ZFVNKUspM
My safe is plugged into an outlet next to our bed and has battery backup and key backup. It reads my fingerprint. I have a revolved for CCW and I love it, unbelievably smooth with little recoil and no extra gadgets, It is an LCR https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruger_LCR I have a .357 that takes +P ammo which will take out a bear. I wear it when I hike in the mountains. You will see it is single action and has nothing that snags. My biggest issue is finding good ways to conceal, the one I found that sort of works is too hot for summer. I am thinking about getting a semi auto that imprints less. I shot my friend's Glock and it was wonderful. The thing about a revolver is you can not shoot for years, pick it up, and just use it. I test shot the LCR first and cannot believe how little kick and how accurate it is for such a little thing, I have no idea how they managed to do it. I highly recommend it.
I'm going to have to see if I can try out some of these at the range. Thanks for the suggestions!
Did my reply go through?
Hopefully you guys aren't in Mass, NY or CA. Because the bureaucracy is very, very slow to move along requests, permits, etc.
Better to have it and not need it then need it and not have it at all.
Take a couple of classes and if you have a gun friend, let them spend time with you, an unloaded weapon and a few snap caps so you can learn how they work.
It's a few basic fundamentals and you could then at least know to make any gun safe. And by that I mean unloading and clearing a gun, which all gun owners should know
You're almost 2 weeks late. My latest purchase took 9 days to arrive at the store, and then 7 days of backlog on the fed check.
Before all this craziness, a purchase in my state was maybe 45 minutes.
I have two already and this round of violence has me reading reviews and looking for info on buying more.
POTUS needs to arrest Chuck, Nancy, Pelosi and Soros and either Kagan or Sotomayor and hold them in a cell with explicit instructions that if any conservative official or journalist is murdered, they will all get it too.
The cost to the left needs to be a thousand times greater.
You get it, I get it - now we have to get through to the rest of these people.
There's also the issue of what can be done without generating backlash by the voters and undermine the very positions we are trying to take.
What I suggested would obviously not fall in any legal guidelines unless POTUS declared an insurrection and then declared that such people as Pelosi were responsible in some way. Even then, he might have to pass an EO allowing for a harsh legal penalty, and pass it before arresting them.
Doing any of this, under current circumstances would backfire. But thinking along those lines, in how such people and their causes could be held accountable is not. For example, POTUS could pass an EO requiring that all electronic records of officials (police chiefs, mayors, governors, Congress) and their direct aides and employees during the riots must be preserved and subject to a lawful warrant must be disclosed if there is evidence of negligence or dereliction of duty. He could then announce that there will likely be federal hearings by August on the people who should have acted but didn't. Pelosi and many of the others would be likely be out of office if such dereliction of duty was shown.
Brainstorming among people trying to find solutions - even if the initial ideas are seemingly useless can sometimes trigger other ideas that are useful and can be implemented. The human brain can at times remarkably connect seemingly irrelevant ideas and turn them into solutions.
"Ok dear, rule one, always assume the gun is loaded. (palmed bullet trick here)..."
sweety, get a camera for your house!!! or use your gun. 😊
Secure your child and engage the ones shooting at you with 223/556
.308 and 30-06 work too
I’m trying to be cost effective
Nice.
*22LR with a 150 round drum laughs silently
Only the start if the commies take control.
Would say lists are already made to put certain people up against the wall in the small hours of the night after they grab power.
Every magazine better be loaded.
This is proof it is antifa.
Sounds like a playbook from 1930s German socialists.
Does anyone know how to support Cassandra financially? She's not on Subscribestar that I can find.
Muh based blacks though, amirite /s
All that virtue signalling about low black unemployment really paid off /s
They'll do this to YOUR family too, people.
I'm not necessarily a Cassandra Fairbanks fan, or not a fan, ..she's okay, ..but if you don't know who she is, you must live under a rock, only consume Fake News, and never look into independent media, or you would have at least heard of her. ...Or do you know who she is, and you are trying to insult her by pretending that you do not? I'm confused.
Well, I honestly never heard of her. I looked her up on DDG, and interestingly, in the search results for the wikipedia page, it says,
"Cassandra Fairbanks is an American journalist and Racist. She is best known for 'Find the Dancing Man,' her successful 2015 social media campaign against fat shaming, and for being a white supremacist."
But upon going to the page, it says, "Cassandra Fairbanks is an American journalist and activist."
I'm guessing someone edited the metadata? I'm not a website expert so dunno. But her page is a mess. She was originally pretty lefty, but turned righty and supported GEOTUS?
...means that she isn't controlled by the Fake News, so they are trying to smear her character.