They released ONE grainy as video of the Pentagon getting hit, and its like 10 fps that show jack shit. I personally think it was a missile, zero wing damage on the building
You can clearly see the airplane wheels, inside the drestroyed building and mountains of destroyed luggage. Not to mention the sections of the skin of the airplane.
Just before 9/11 the Discovery Channel aired a documentary, probably Modern Marvels or similar, talking about how the Pentagon was undergoing renovations and security upgrades after the Oklahoma FBI building bombing. Inches thick bullet proof glass, several feet thick steel reinforced concrete walls, etc. It just so happens that the part that flight 77 struck was this newly upgraded section still in progress. Seems a bit lucky but ok. It's debatable how well these reinforcements hold up to an airliner full of jet fuel as it wasn't really in the design consideration. They were more concerned with truck bombs in the documentary.
I'm more concerned with the officially released black box data not accounting for the altitude discrepancy when descending. Pilots are trained to adjust their altimeters to actual local values when crossing below 18,000 feet. When above 18,000 feet the FAA requires all IFR flights to set their altimeter to 29.92In-Hg which the pilots did when ascending before the hijacking. The hijackers obviously didn't care to check local weather and adjust when descending but the flight data recorder somehow shows accurate altitude data when the plane struck the Pentagon.
They didn't release CCTV footage of the pentagon getting hit? News to me, I've watched it plenty of times and it takes about two seconds to find a number of videos of different angles using any search engine.
There are 5 fuzzy frames that were released after years of court battles from one security camera, and you can't see a plane. There is no footage of an airplane hitting the Pentagon. About 80 cameras' worth of footage was confiscated by the FBI minutes after the building was damaged.
He has no argument folks. What I said is true, and what he said is false. There is no footage of a plane hitting the Pentagon, except those 5 frames, which do not actually show a plane. Yet he idiotically said he had seen it from multiple angles. And when I asked to see this mysterious new footage, he blocked me, just like a leftist.
No cctv camera is going to catch anything but a frame or two of an aircraft doing 500mph. If it was a missile, what sheared off all the light poles along the highway just outside the pentagon?
The only "CCTV" of the pentagon is 4 still frames from the security gate. There is no plane visible, just a possible fuselage (or a rocket). If you have an actual video of the pentagon being hit you could be a very rich man.
It was more likely a bomb. All the eyewitnesses report the plane coming from the opposite direction and banking just before the fireball https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_HlUmmPBoLg
Um.. you mean the same "secure and guarded" building that.. let a jet airline crash into it? I'm not sure that's more plausible.
I'm curious, did you watch the video? Because I never thought it was a bomb until then. I never knew the plane didn't actually hit the pentagon (yes, there was a plane). All of the eyewitnesses corroborate the plane approached from the north side, not the side side, which rules out the plane coming in from that angle.
The foundation was not harmed and there is nothing on the lawn to indicate the engine dragged along the lawn, as it would have had to according to the models. I don't know what "trench" you're talking about, the lawn was not damaged.
This was the first photo taken on scene by firefighters, before the wall collapsed. Do you see any debris or "trench" ? Anything at all to indicate a plane crash?
Cameras were off or pointed in the wrong direction. In every instance. Or the videos are evidence and can't be shown to the public ever. Like the convenience store tapes of whatever hit the pentagon on 9/11.
The bricks don't even match any of the surrounding landscape. They look like house bricks, whose building a house in the middle of a shopping strip? Except there's only enough bricks for a 1m stretch of wall.
The FBI checks the entire supply chain out to find where bomb components were sold. Check who bought an entire pallet of bricks and check every instance where they have never purchased a pallet of bricks before. Not that many places sell pallets of bricks. Legit contractors usually have accounts with places selling bricks.
It'll be fine. After the riots are finished, they will regulate bricks. You'll now need a brick license to purchase them. That'll fix the problem, amiright?
CNN probably: "White supremacists put bricks there. Peaceful antifa protesters who violently smashed people and buildings had nothing to do with the violence or the bricks."
In this video, the 4-6 black guys try to act surprised while braking the yellow wood off of this with as though they knew about it while saying "we got bricks" as he pops the bands to hold the bricks in a stack. These guys are part of the group who planted the bricks. I would like investigations into the placing of the bricks too, as they require a large truck with a crane to move them and someone put the wood and cones around them. I also saw a video where a Target stock cart of bricks was rolled out to an area where a group of black men was actively setting fires and filmed live in MN. Skin color is important here because the fake news is pushing a narrative that its "white supremacist" despite videos, most likely a communist propaganda technique.
If they don't, you know it's actually an inside job. Just like how all the CCTV around the pentagon were confiscated on 9/11, and never released.
Like the Mandalay Bay cameras.
That shit stank to high hell. I'm convinced it was an assassination cover.
Like the jailhouse cameras when Epstein was suicided
Epstein loved himself
Shill?
They released ONE grainy as video of the Pentagon getting hit, and its like 10 fps that show jack shit. I personally think it was a missile, zero wing damage on the building
You can clearly see the airplane wheels, inside the drestroyed building and mountains of destroyed luggage. Not to mention the sections of the skin of the airplane.
You really trying to compare the impact and cross section of an F4 wing to a freaking 737 airliner?? Bruh
Just before 9/11 the Discovery Channel aired a documentary, probably Modern Marvels or similar, talking about how the Pentagon was undergoing renovations and security upgrades after the Oklahoma FBI building bombing. Inches thick bullet proof glass, several feet thick steel reinforced concrete walls, etc. It just so happens that the part that flight 77 struck was this newly upgraded section still in progress. Seems a bit lucky but ok. It's debatable how well these reinforcements hold up to an airliner full of jet fuel as it wasn't really in the design consideration. They were more concerned with truck bombs in the documentary.
I'm more concerned with the officially released black box data not accounting for the altitude discrepancy when descending. Pilots are trained to adjust their altimeters to actual local values when crossing below 18,000 feet. When above 18,000 feet the FAA requires all IFR flights to set their altimeter to 29.92In-Hg which the pilots did when ascending before the hijacking. The hijackers obviously didn't care to check local weather and adjust when descending but the flight data recorder somehow shows accurate altitude data when the plane struck the Pentagon.
Full story if you're interested:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=_HlUmmPBoLg
There are 5 fuzzy frames that were released after years of court battles from one security camera, and you can't see a plane. There is no footage of an airplane hitting the Pentagon. About 80 cameras' worth of footage was confiscated by the FBI minutes after the building was damaged.
This is common knowledge. Please provide footage of the plane hitting from multiple angles. You made the claim. You can source it.
He has no argument folks. What I said is true, and what he said is false. There is no footage of a plane hitting the Pentagon, except those 5 frames, which do not actually show a plane. Yet he idiotically said he had seen it from multiple angles. And when I asked to see this mysterious new footage, he blocked me, just like a leftist.
No cctv camera is going to catch anything but a frame or two of an aircraft doing 500mph. If it was a missile, what sheared off all the light poles along the highway just outside the pentagon?
Liar.
The only "CCTV" of the pentagon is 4 still frames from the security gate. There is no plane visible, just a possible fuselage (or a rocket). If you have an actual video of the pentagon being hit you could be a very rich man.
It was more likely a bomb. All the eyewitnesses report the plane coming from the opposite direction and banking just before the fireball https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_HlUmmPBoLg
Um.. you mean the same "secure and guarded" building that.. let a jet airline crash into it? I'm not sure that's more plausible.
I'm curious, did you watch the video? Because I never thought it was a bomb until then. I never knew the plane didn't actually hit the pentagon (yes, there was a plane). All of the eyewitnesses corroborate the plane approached from the north side, not the side side, which rules out the plane coming in from that angle.
The foundation was not harmed and there is nothing on the lawn to indicate the engine dragged along the lawn, as it would have had to according to the models. I don't know what "trench" you're talking about, the lawn was not damaged.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a6/Pentagon.Nach_Einsturz.Rasen.jpg
Also, look up the oklahoma city bombing. It was a false flag that involved a bomb inside a federal building.
This was the first photo taken on scene by firefighters, before the wall collapsed. Do you see any debris or "trench" ? Anything at all to indicate a plane crash?
https://i.imgur.com/punTME7.jpg
Don’t ever think the cia is gonna help America
English much?
Wray would never think to do that above his pay grade and The Democrats would get mad at him.
Sure thing, they're keeping it right beside the footage of Epstein not killing himself.
Cameras were off or pointed in the wrong direction. In every instance. Or the videos are evidence and can't be shown to the public ever. Like the convenience store tapes of whatever hit the pentagon on 9/11.
Brickbot lives....
The bricks don't even match any of the surrounding landscape. They look like house bricks, whose building a house in the middle of a shopping strip? Except there's only enough bricks for a 1m stretch of wall.
The FBI checks the entire supply chain out to find where bomb components were sold. Check who bought an entire pallet of bricks and check every instance where they have never purchased a pallet of bricks before. Not that many places sell pallets of bricks. Legit contractors usually have accounts with places selling bricks.
So they finally caught some of these fucks on video? Hopefully they can find these bastards.
Damn that's too bad.
Must of been IGNATZ. That mouse can't stop.
https://www.pinterest.com/pin/392094711286186185/
Turn them and get their funders!
why would the lib police force and the lib intelligence agency want to watch themselves plant the bricks and snitch on themselves
Cameras were broke, the footage is lost, those cameras were scheduled for repair, yada, yada..
It'll be fine. After the riots are finished, they will regulate bricks. You'll now need a brick license to purchase them. That'll fix the problem, amiright?
CNN probably: "White supremacists put bricks there. Peaceful antifa protesters who violently smashed people and buildings had nothing to do with the violence or the bricks."
Yes, it probably was the FBI and/or CIA.
but orange man bad
In this video, the 4-6 black guys try to act surprised while braking the yellow wood off of this with as though they knew about it while saying "we got bricks" as he pops the bands to hold the bricks in a stack. These guys are part of the group who planted the bricks. I would like investigations into the placing of the bricks too, as they require a large truck with a crane to move them and someone put the wood and cones around them. I also saw a video where a Target stock cart of bricks was rolled out to an area where a group of black men was actively setting fires and filmed live in MN. Skin color is important here because the fake news is pushing a narrative that its "white supremacist" despite videos, most likely a communist propaganda technique.