941
Comments (103)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
15
CornPopvotesTrump 15 points ago +20 / -5

Everyone knows George was a Dindu but the real question is does a Dindu deserve to be choked to death? There's a legal process to bring him to justice and what the cop did was not it.

12
Spooky_Lunch 12 points ago +13 / -1

Idk ehy you are downvoted, you're right. He was a criminal but cops don't get to be judge, jury, and executioner. Doesn't mean this riots are by any means justified, but it also doesn't mean this cop was either.

7
krzyzowiec 7 points ago +10 / -3

He wasn't choked to death.

5
deleted 5 points ago +8 / -3
-2
HuggableBear -2 points ago +6 / -8

If you agree, then what is the point of your post? You make no mention of the media, no mention of liberal hypocrisy, just show us a criminal record.

If you agree that he didn't deserve to be executed, why even bring it up? You say we're not allowed to talk bad about him, but why do you want to talk bad about him in the first place if you agree?

This entire issue has literally nothing to do with the man. This isn't about the victim, he's just the victim.

This is(was) about cops taking things too far and for too long. The victim has nothing to do with that, not in a case like this. This wasn't a snap decision that a single cop had to make in the blink of an eye. This wasn't a shooting. Four cops kept him subdued for 8 minutes. His prior actions mean nothing in this situation, and they stopped meaning anything after about 30 seconds.

Yes, I know that the riots themselves have nothing to do with the man anymore. But that wasn't your complaint. Your complaint that you decided to post about was that you aren't allowed to bring up his past.

Well, you just agreed that what happened was wrong, so I ask you again, why do you even want to bring it up in the first place if you agree that it was wrong and he was the victim?

1
SirPokeSmottington 1 point ago +1 / -0

why do you even want to bring it up in the first place if you agree that it was wrong and he was the victim?

As someone further down points out:

Throwaway_Test 3 points 54 minutes ago

It is clear that this topic is intended to indicate that Floyd was no saint, and he certainly does not deserve the worship that he is receiving from virtually every corner - including commentators that are often regarded as conservative. We have heard nothing publicly about his criminal record and are forced to seek out such information through channels such as this one. It is very unlikely that whatever offense in which he was involved was of the sort that merits his accidental death, but Floyd was a bad guy. He was a problem - a blight on society.

1
HuggableBear 1 point ago +1 / -0

Answer the question. None of what you posted answers the question.

Why? To what purpose are you bringing up the history of a dead man whom you admit is the victim?

1
671-EVIL 1 point ago +2 / -1

No, the question is why are the hypocrites upset about dindu but not if the same happens to a white person. Also, if you look at arrests for violent crimes, blacks are not more likely to get killed than whites.