3627
Comments (338)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
137
Narcan 137 points ago +138 / -1

I agree. I would imagine that bailouts are not coming. It's a glorious thing. Why help states that don't help themselves?

83
deleted 83 points ago +83 / -0
64
deleted 64 points ago +64 / -0
64
deleted 64 points ago +67 / -3
29
deleted 29 points ago +29 / -0
27
Sargentpilcher 27 points ago +29 / -2

Exactly. I'm an anarchy capitalist, and all the people calling this anarchy are completely wrong. If this were anarchy, looters would be dead.

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
I_no_asshoe 2 points ago +2 / -0

The feckless governors and mayors won’t bring in the extra support to help their police force. Why on earth would the local police go into battle if they’re going to get slaughtered by design?

28
deleted 28 points ago +28 / -0
25
sth1d 25 points ago +25 / -0

Honestly the last thing I would send into that mess is a K9. It's a situation for water cannons and tear gas, not K9s. Would much rather not see any of those dogs get hurt over this.

9
Mukato 9 points ago +10 / -1

Send a pack of hundreds of canines, maybe a few bears...

18
MortyArk 18 points ago +18 / -0

I would pay good money to watch them drop a Grizzly bear with body armor on those rioters.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +2 / -1

I don't think dogs would be getting hurt.

I do think non-lethal means could get this under control, and the NG (as well as cops) should have the ability to defend themselves with lethal force if it comes to that.

2
sth1d 2 points ago +2 / -0

I did see a video where there were about 10 dogs together. That's a much better idea. People might decide to gang up on 1 dog, but nobody's going to mess with 10 plus their handlers.

19
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 19 points ago +19 / -0

That has been the standard riot response since the 1992 L.A. Riots. That was when they decided to use soft de-escalation instead of suppression by any means necessary, which used to be the standard response.

19
Block_Helen 19 points ago +19 / -0

instead of suppression by any means necessary, which used to be the standard response.

"Looters will be shot on sight."

22
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 22 points ago +22 / -0

Exactly, and once a riot was declared they would give an order to disperse, and those that didn't comply were forcibly dispersed and arrested using any means necessary, including lethal force. I attended a LE academy in the 1980s and this is what we were taught regarding riot response.

19
deleted 19 points ago +22 / -3
2
Troll 2 points ago +7 / -5

In the end we find out that cops were zilch useful the entire time. Who knew?

5
deleted 5 points ago +8 / -3
2
FuckRioters 2 points ago +2 / -0

Libertarians, AnCaps, and Militias knew.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
11
Evei 11 points ago +12 / -1

the governors and their minions are trying to force the president to use extreme measures so that they can then turn on him and claim he is terrorist dictator.

Meanwhile, the Chinese are probably seriously considering just walking in and taking over. It's who the dems work for anyway.

2
FormerGraveheart 2 points ago +3 / -1

Meanwhile, the Chinese are probably seriously considering just walking in and taking over

No. Don't be silly. The Chinese would have to project power over thousands of miles of ocean against a fully intact US Navy. They do not have this capability. The US can't be conquered by an external enemy: the geography doesn't allow it. It can only be conquered from within.

13
elephant_nuts 13 points ago +13 / -0

I wish. I don’t want a single tax dollar of mine going to rebuild these hell holes, but I imagine we’ll pay for it anyway.

6
Thearchduke 6 points ago +8 / -2

Bailouts will come, as usual.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
top_eagle 3 points ago +3 / -0

The danger is that it forces lefties to leave the state and settle in red land.

2
CuomoisaMassMurderer 2 points ago +3 / -1

That's when the shoot on sight orders commence?