17
Comments (19)
sorted by:
5
smacpats111111 5 points ago +5 / -0

Relax. The guy criticized Trump once and you are already ready to declare war on him. Regardless of whether the criticism against trump was warranted or not, the rest of his show he was laying the situation out perfectly.

3
ramennov [S] 3 points ago +5 / -2

Excuse me, not regardless. Maybe you can easily wave away and forgive baseless attacks on our president but I don’t. “Aware only of himself” is a leftist talking point and not fair to Trump. Do you really believe Trump doesn’t want to do what he can to restore peace and law and order, the platform he ran on? There’s no acknowledgement whatsoever of that from Cucker, to the point where I doubt his intentions. Trump isn’t above criticism, but to question Trump’s commitment to his platform the first day that shit beyond his control goes south is cowardly and disingenuous.

4
deleted 4 points ago +5 / -1
1
BillionsAndBillions 1 point ago +1 / -0

In Kushner's keen take on the situation, "You already have the trailer park vote; you can take that for granted." Referring to his base, while pushing for more pandering. The base may not vote Biden, but they might not be motivated to vote at all if they feel their last great hope in Trump has abandoned them, and that means losing the presidency and the congress. Sadly Trump is surrounded with snakes, Wormtongues whispering in his ear, making him distrust his instincts.

4
deleted 4 points ago +6 / -2
4
ramennov [S] 4 points ago +6 / -2

Fox News hasn’t been the same since Roger Ailes’ ouster. Paul Ryan sits on the board of Fox News’ parent company, Fox Corp. Friggin’ riggin’ Donna Brazile is a regular. Turn it OFF because they’re undermining support for the conservative movement. It is up to US to set the course for conservatism and define what it means, NOT THEM.

Switch to OAN News. See here for how you can watch them.

1
Checkmate6Romeo 1 point ago +2 / -1

I agree with a lot of what he says but I disagree with him here. Troops in the street might not be the best move just yet. Trump doesn't have a lot of good options here. He's going to have to work with the best of the bad options he has. Tucker might end up being right in the end but he shouldn't be so sure of himself. This is a complex situation we find ourselves in. At any rate he's entitled to his opinion and we'll see what happens.

1
texasbobcat5 1 point ago +1 / -0

It was more of an attack on Kush than Trump, but still it's okay to separate MAGA from Trump. If I wanted to be in a mindless koolaid drinking cult I'd be a Democrat

Edit: I do agree with OP that Fox is generally shitty. People that call it controlled opposition are right. Watch OAN if you can. I've also heard newmax is good too but I've never personally watched it

3
ramennov [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

What on Earth are you talking about? There hasn’t been any MAGA before Trump. He started this movement, and you’re not supporting MAGA by undermining him during his presidency with attacks on Trump’s commitment to law and order or his personal bravery, which have no precedent. How about let’s separate mindlessly following a mantra that “no president is above criticism” and looking at whether that criticism is actually fair. It takes more energy to do, which is why fewer people do it, but if you’re honest about supporting Trump, you would feel obligated to.

1
Claudiusdrusus 1 point ago +6 / -5

Trump is not above criticism. Tucker is right

2
ramennov [S] 2 points ago +4 / -2

What is Tucker contributing here, exactly? Nothing he’s said about the need for security and how it could affect the election is somehow secret knowledge, but he hammers Trump anyway as if it were his fault and without faith in Trump’s abilities or commitment to law and order.

If you support Donald Trump, you’re not going to rip on him at a moment’s notice when things don’t go the way you feel they should.

2
Claudiusdrusus 2 points ago +4 / -2

It’s called constructive criticism,

0
ramennov [S] 0 points ago +3 / -3

How about you lay out your argument in a paragraph instead of one sentence at a time? Show that you’re not intellectually lazy.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
1
ramennov [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Where did I say Trump was infallible? Feel free to point it out. Elsewhere in the thread I pointed out specific criticism that I felt was disingenuous. You’re likewise being disingenuous.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
smacpats111111 3 points ago +3 / -0

He said Trump didn't do enough on Sunday night to defend americans.

4
ramennov [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

Is that all? No. He also said Trump appeared “aware only of himself” because he was supposedly in a bunker. Has it occurred to Cucker that perhaps the bunker wasn’t Trump’s decision? The same Trump who stared down a would-be assassin at a rally and walked unescorted into North Korea? Bullshit. I don’t trust Cucker’s intentions or his ability to think clearly when he so easily forgets the man he’s talking about.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +3 / -4