Win uses cookies necessary for site functionality, as well as for personalization. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.
the fact she used her private email for work should reclassify her email to her work email and everything on that server and any outgoing/incoming email should have been confiscated
Why would we do that? He's the only one actually fighting back. Sorry I want as much as possible. In fact, you can donate to them via amazon smile (if you still use amazon).
Oh. Okay. Judicial Watch sucks a bag of dicks because the government (and people they doggedly go after in effort to hold them accountable) simply continue to lie, cheat, and steal.
Regardless, let us all know when you have had better success.
The Dc Court of Appeals is on Hillary's side. You can hear them getting pissed in their voice. Pedes....justice is not blind but has picked a side well before this hearing took place.
I mean did anyone think any differently? Hildog is a now political 0 and still can't be tried for anything. Our govt is deeply, deeply corrupted. I dunno how Judicial Watch deals with the frustration.
Female judge is a pure plant. "You have to work with what the agency has. You can't go out and find more... This has been done. It's done." So it was all a coverup.
That's a nice loophole the deep state uses to bury information. Just have a plant do a poor job looking for the information a few times and the state will throw their arms up and say, "I guess that's it, you have to work with what the agency has!"
Shit!!! The female judge is pushing back so hard! At the 1:06:00 mark she goes off and says, "What in your wildest dreams..." The judge is saying the claim is a conspiracy theory and questions the validity of the claim! WTF?!?!?!
Not your programming logic, but in your logic that NPCs learnee to code. NPCs didn't learn to code, they were the one telling miners to learn to code and then cried when lay d off journos were told to learn to code
Don't hate on the judge too damn much... Hillary wouldn't even be in the hot seat today if it wasn't for the judge....
Although I've been speculating for months that the only reason the judge okayed this was for them to pull some bullshit to attempt to set some sort of precedent so that this can't happen in the future....
She was narrowly confirmed by a vote of 51-44, with her detractors labeling her as one of the most extreme liberal nominees to the federal bench in decades.[1]
"Pillard's nomination to the D.C. Circuit, along with the nominations of Robert L. Wilkins and Patricia Ann Millett, ultimately became central to the debate over the use of the filibuster in the United States Senate, leading to the controversial use of the nuclear option to bring it to the floor for a vote. She was narrowly confirmed by a vote of 51-44, with her detractors labeling her as one of the most extreme liberal nominees to the federal bench in decades.[1]"
Can't listen. This is just going to piss me off and ruin my day.
I am so sick of this evil fucking cunt walking free - and these fucking driveling morons who can't see far enough past their nose to realize that this fucking bitch is as evil and corrupt as they come.
See? See!? I haven't been listening and I'm already pissed...
I am certain of it. There are metaphysical principles at play, I assure you. She is beyond redemption. Her comeuppance is nigh, at least, in the next life.
But think of the power of having a case law holding Hillary accountable in some way. That alone is better than simply holding her to account. It enables nailing future swamp monsters.
This is why we need military tribunals with NSA documents to avoid clown shows like this with regards to espionage and treason against the American people.
Title was copied from judicial watch twitter post where I found the link. Blame Tommy Guns for sensationalizing. I'm not pleased to find this out either.
It's an appeals court hearing where judges grant or deny a proper hearing for an actual "round 2". They cross examine the lawyers to see the merits of the case and why it was appealed. Then decide to allow another hearing or uphold the initial ruling.
From 57:30 on you start to hear the female judge get very testy and cagey and pushing back. 2 minutes after the judge keeps pushing... By 1:02:30 mark the judge summarizes and still doesn't want to concede. Very important back and forth in this from my perspective.
Thought the same thing. To start, she went after the other judges and the difference was stark. I suspect a good percentage of those listening said "Wait, that's a judge?"
I'll let some legal eagles like Fitton watch this. Not that I'm not interested but if I have to hear hilldog lie I'm going to throw my phone out the window
It's hard to make people understand what TS SCI/SAP documents are, and why the fact that she even had possession of them was already a crime, much less the fact that if you or I sent such documents to enemy nation states and terrorist groups, we would simply be disappeared without a trace. No trial, no juries, just boom, foreign blacksite dungeon for life.
Guaranteed she wasn't sworn in on any of those documents she had, which means she stole them in the first place.
I also think it's a massive red herring for people to focus on Obongo and co wiretapping Trump (as infuriating as that is) because what she actually did is much much more of a concrete case of treason, rather than sedition, and involves hundreds of felonies. Truthfully people think "oh but they gotta build the case"... that's wrong. They could have arrested her on DAY ONE.
I still haven't seen anyone explain how she's able to get away with theft of TS-SCI and SAP documents she wasn't sworn in to the programs for. At that point it's not even a case of mishandling, since she had to actively look for and steal those documents in order to distribute them from her unsecured private server.
I also suspect she had U-SAP documents on her server as well, which is probably why no one is pursuing it, since people might get sketched out over the sorts of things involved in those programs.
Heard that as well. Wow. These judges are trying hard to get her off. Judge literally said "If the question is whether there was a full search, what difference does it make whether Clinton was aware of government record keeping?"
Seems to be something they set in their end..."Watching "made for kids" content
To comply with the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) and other laws, certain features may be restricted or turned off on content that’s set as made for kids."
Oh she'll take the oath and she'll mean it..... and she won't actually tell a lie at all, at least not in the legal sense... an unfortunate fundamental flaw in our system that I'm not sure is even fixable until way in the future maybe... The only way you can fight it is if you already have concrete, court ready, proof the answer they just gave was a lie, but even then it's very easy to argue that she's not lying and she simply can't remember something from that long ago... They can even bring in doctors to say that at her age it's very common for details to start getting fuzzy... She is a professional at this. As much as we hate her guts, the woman isn't stupid.
It really sounds like these judges don’t want to inconvenience Clinton any further to get to the truth. They have no proof outside of the State Department that all emails have been found, and the State Department has not proved they found all the emails. That is the basis of Judicial Watch’d argument but they could give a shit less.
The dumb airhead sounding bitch is Pillard, who was appointed by 0bama of course. They used the "nuclear option" to confirm her and she was referred to as, "most extreme liberal nominees to the federal bench in decades"
What’s interesting to listen to is this female judge constantly interrupting and belittling an up and coming female lawyer. Wonder what her stance on feminism is....
Many Youtube videos do not play in the feed. You have to click the title and wtach on Youtube.
I cant believe no one here has said this yet...
Today is "National Blackout Day" for BLM. The real reason is to censor media coverage on this testimony! Get the word out.
Blackout day, wtf is that? Im starting to find every single person who supports blm a total piece of retarded shit.
firsttime?meme.jpeg
That's the first thing I thought when I seen "blackout day"
I can't wait to see what happens tonight to dominate over top of the Rosenstein testimony tomorrow.
ding ding ding
the fact she used her private email for work should reclassify her email to her work email and everything on that server and any outgoing/incoming email should have been confiscated
Well you didn't think she was actually going to show up today unless they had a concrete plan now did you?
Good.
The vid isn’t losing even when I click on it!!!!!
Why would we do that? He's the only one actually fighting back. Sorry I want as much as possible. In fact, you can donate to them via amazon smile (if you still use amazon).
You call forcing (latest rough count) millions of old voter registrations from the books "no results?"
Interesting.....
Oh. Okay. Judicial Watch sucks a bag of dicks because the government (and people they doggedly go after in effort to hold them accountable) simply continue to lie, cheat, and steal.
Regardless, let us all know when you have had better success.
The Dc Court of Appeals is on Hillary's side. You can hear them getting pissed in their voice. Pedes....justice is not blind but has picked a side well before this hearing took place.
I mean did anyone think any differently? Hildog is a now political 0 and still can't be tried for anything. Our govt is deeply, deeply corrupted. I dunno how Judicial Watch deals with the frustration.
HELLary stole over 900 FBI files and, just like that, they suddenly appeared in the WH personal quarters.
Does "Under Oath" matter when you worship Satan?
She is an oaf.
It does not
It does if you can prove she lied under oath. That's a criminal charge.
That's only true for Republicans and normal people.
Holy shit, paraphrase: “this took place under Clinton’s state department. It is now Trumps state department so what does it matter/how is it relevant”
"WHAT DIFFERENCE AT THIS POINT DOES IT MAKE!"
Judge is now saying it doesn't matter because of the current administration - GET THIS JUDGE OUT OF HERE!
Female judge is a pure plant. "You have to work with what the agency has. You can't go out and find more... This has been done. It's done." So it was all a coverup.
That's a nice loophole the deep state uses to bury information. Just have a plant do a poor job looking for the information a few times and the state will throw their arms up and say, "I guess that's it, you have to work with what the agency has!"
I do not recall
I cannot recall
I don't recall
I do not remember
I cannot remember
I don't remember
I do not have any recollection of that
I don't have any recollection of that
I have no recollection of that
Not that I can remember
Not that I can recall
Not that I remember
Not that I recall
Am I doing this right? Do I win some sort of prize?!
"I plead the fif"
Oh I wish that bitch would
"My mind is jello....."
h/t to Paul Shanklin
I can't remember
my brain's in a blender
reminds me of Reagan during the Iran Contra hearings
These judges sure know how to play dumb.
True, but that's why a good offense is so important. Fortunately the JW lawyer has been able to respond to all questions. She's prepared well.
LMAO
"It sounds like this is the trump administration that's doing the cover up"
Obama judge
So he should be happy to help....
Is it just me or are these judges interrupting all the time? They don't seem to respect Judicial Watch lawyer at all.
Correct
They are constantly interrupting
"Yes it's apples and oranges. But you have to pick what is on there. You can't ask the court to find more trees."
I kid you not, this is who we have to deal with.
Judges sounding like defence.
The legal system is a joke.
Shit!!! The female judge is pushing back so hard! At the 1:06:00 mark she goes off and says, "What in your wildest dreams..." The judge is saying the claim is a conspiracy theory and questions the validity of the claim! WTF?!?!?!
The rule of law needs revising to account for flaws like this. Solutions?
while (true) {
reeeeee();
}
There is an error in your logic
Not your programming logic, but in your logic that NPCs learnee to code. NPCs didn't learn to code, they were the one telling miners to learn to code and then cried when lay d off journos were told to learn to code
Other than that, very true and very funny
Hello fellow computer science pede!
I AM NOT FOLLOWING! THE STATE DID AN ADEQUATE SEARCH!
no, the fact that emails are continously being found, that would prove to be false
Listen to how differently the bitch judge addresses this guy compared to JW...
Unbelievable!
I really don't understand how this is a fucking question?
The bitch used a PRIVATE EMAIL SERVER FOR CLASSIFIED GOVERNMENT INFORMATION
Where is the fucking AMBIGUITY in this case????
I don't fucking get it.
A lawyer needs to find an example of another person doing the same thing and getting punished for it. Then you pose two questions:
are there two systems of justice in this country?
what the fuck are we even doing here?
The difference is striking.
I wonder if the judges are aware that this livestream is being watched by 11,000 people?
I wonder if they even have a reason to care
Don't hate on the judge too damn much... Hillary wouldn't even be in the hot seat today if it wasn't for the judge....
Although I've been speculating for months that the only reason the judge okayed this was for them to pull some bullshit to attempt to set some sort of precedent so that this can't happen in the future....
The Clinton Sin-O-matic Universe should not be a franchise
They keep talking about Matt Damon, guess he's in the movie too.
"I'm sorry judge.. I'm dumbfounded that you just responded like that to my explanation. It's as if you don't have any idea what I'm saying."
LEGEND:
High-pitched female voice = JW attorney
Lower-pitched female voice = Judge Cornelia Pillard https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cornelia_Pillard
Man's voice = Judge Thomas Griffith
Edit: Sorry for earlier error!
She was narrowly confirmed by a vote of 51-44, with her detractors labeling her as one of the most extreme liberal nominees to the federal bench in decades.[1]
Judge Cornelia Pillard
"Pillard's nomination to the D.C. Circuit, along with the nominations of Robert L. Wilkins and Patricia Ann Millett, ultimately became central to the debate over the use of the filibuster in the United States Senate, leading to the controversial use of the nuclear option to bring it to the floor for a vote. She was narrowly confirmed by a vote of 51-44, with her detractors labeling her as one of the most extreme liberal nominees to the federal bench in decades.[1]"
Is there only one judge hearing this?
Sounds like it to me...or they are conferring and only one is speaking.
No there are multiple judges. The woman who is not with JW is a judge....
Thanks, I have corrected.
There is at least 2, so has to be 3.
3 judges.
This is wrong - in the beginning there's a male voice saying he is representing HRC and Cheryl Mills.
2 HRC attorneys. First one stuttered a lot.
Thanks, I have corrected...
The echo-y male voice is a judge, Judge Griffith, the deeper male voice with no echo is HRC lawyer
Male lawyers name is Mr. Kendall or Mr. Kimball?
"Mrs. Clinton, what do you have to say about this preponderance of evidence, precident, and rule of law?"
"I plead the 5th!"
"Good enough for me."
"See, she's innocent" - the lame-steam media probably.
Can't listen. This is just going to piss me off and ruin my day.
I am so sick of this evil fucking cunt walking free - and these fucking driveling morons who can't see far enough past their nose to realize that this fucking bitch is as evil and corrupt as they come.
See? See!? I haven't been listening and I'm already pissed...
I feel your anger, brother. Few things make me more pissed than the fact this bitch is walking free.
I'm not religious, really. But sometimes I fantasize there will be an eternal reckoning for her.
I am certain of it. There are metaphysical principles at play, I assure you. She is beyond redemption. Her comeuppance is nigh, at least, in the next life.
But think of the power of having a case law holding Hillary accountable in some way. That alone is better than simply holding her to account. It enables nailing future swamp monsters.
This is why we need military tribunals with NSA documents to avoid clown shows like this with regards to espionage and treason against the American people.
Judges are supposed to be fair, right?
lmao @ "under oath" like it means something to evil sociopaths like Hillary.
Didn’t the scorpion give his oath to the frog??
🐸 💀
Judges are acting more like defense attorneys.
And the vocal fry on that female judge is terrible.
Has anyone heard Hillary actually answer a question or even be sworn in? Is Hillary in attendance in the actual building?
This is an Appellate case where just the lawyers argue about the legal issues that brought them there.
Thanks. So the title is a lie.
I don't like dishonest clickbait.
Title was copied from judicial watch twitter post where I found the link. Blame Tommy Guns for sensationalizing. I'm not pleased to find this out either.
I do not think she is present.
or president
BURN!!!!!
Hi-YOOOOOO
She couldn't be president - she couldn't have made the walk from the WH front door to the St John's church without the Scooby van.
It just so happens that this takes place during a major crisis where it gets no news
.#BlackOutTuesday on social media......aka everyone go to sleep nothing to see here
Holy shit. Dots connected
Or it could just be the cover for sleeper cells to hit infrastructure and cause literal blackouts
Democrats being Democrats?
Imagine my shock.
If you just tuned into this you would think these judges are defense attorneys. Since when are judges so argumentative?
RIght?
This whole thing is a clown show.
It's an appeals court hearing where judges grant or deny a proper hearing for an actual "round 2". They cross examine the lawyers to see the merits of the case and why it was appealed. Then decide to allow another hearing or uphold the initial ruling.
From 57:30 on you start to hear the female judge get very testy and cagey and pushing back. 2 minutes after the judge keeps pushing... By 1:02:30 mark the judge summarizes and still doesn't want to concede. Very important back and forth in this from my perspective.
I gather they’re being told to take it to a Federal Court.
This lady (Judge) is a liar. She's a little-girl-talker? Every statement is a question?
Thought the same thing. To start, she went after the other judges and the difference was stark. I suspect a good percentage of those listening said "Wait, that's a judge?"
I'll let some legal eagles like Fitton watch this. Not that I'm not interested but if I have to hear hilldog lie I'm going to throw my phone out the window
People still don't even understand what she did.
It's hard to make people understand what TS SCI/SAP documents are, and why the fact that she even had possession of them was already a crime, much less the fact that if you or I sent such documents to enemy nation states and terrorist groups, we would simply be disappeared without a trace. No trial, no juries, just boom, foreign blacksite dungeon for life.
Guaranteed she wasn't sworn in on any of those documents she had, which means she stole them in the first place.
I also think it's a massive red herring for people to focus on Obongo and co wiretapping Trump (as infuriating as that is) because what she actually did is much much more of a concrete case of treason, rather than sedition, and involves hundreds of felonies. Truthfully people think "oh but they gotta build the case"... that's wrong. They could have arrested her on DAY ONE.
I've been working under the assumption that the DOJ has been influenced greatly by her influence so things have been overlooked.
Unfortunately for the left while they were reeeing thousands of patriots have been taking job offers under their noses.
That said I don't know anything. I'm a simple goat farmer.
I still haven't seen anyone explain how she's able to get away with theft of TS-SCI and SAP documents she wasn't sworn in to the programs for. At that point it's not even a case of mishandling, since she had to actively look for and steal those documents in order to distribute them from her unsecured private server.
I also suspect she had U-SAP documents on her server as well, which is probably why no one is pursuing it, since people might get sketched out over the sorts of things involved in those programs.
Should have, not could have.
Money says it's going to be "I don't recall" on repeat for 15 min.
"Under oath"
They'll have to make her swear on the antifa manual. Demons tend to catch on fire when touching holy symbols.
These judges are being intentionally dense.
DAMNNNNNNN...bitch just made it VERY POLITICAL!
Hillary cares about lying under oath like these rioters care about looting in front of police.
It’s the same picture
Wait, what's the definition of the word "is"?
WhaT diFFeReeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeNcE dOes iT make?
Heard that as well. Wow. These judges are trying hard to get her off. Judge literally said "If the question is whether there was a full search, what difference does it make whether Clinton was aware of government record keeping?"
Everything this fuck is saying could be a lie and she destroyed evidence.
He sounds like Porky the Pig too.
Love that they disabled the live chat for "content made for children" because so many kids watch the US court of appeals channel.
If there's children involved, you bet
Seems to be something they set in their end..."Watching "made for kids" content To comply with the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) and other laws, certain features may be restricted or turned off on content that’s set as made for kids."
Hrrmm. Maybe it's because I'm on mobile. I've never seen it before either but I never do live chat on my phone.
Is he arguing that they can't turn over emails because they may be damaging?
We should play the game where we take a drink every time she says she doesn't recall
Some of us have to be able to function within the next month...
How many shots do you take when she can't make it up the steps and craps her diaper?
Or gets thrown into the back of a black van like a side of beef after a crazy seizure.
Lol like oaths matter to this vile witch.
Oh she'll take the oath and she'll mean it..... and she won't actually tell a lie at all, at least not in the legal sense... an unfortunate fundamental flaw in our system that I'm not sure is even fixable until way in the future maybe... The only way you can fight it is if you already have concrete, court ready, proof the answer they just gave was a lie, but even then it's very easy to argue that she's not lying and she simply can't remember something from that long ago... They can even bring in doctors to say that at her age it's very common for details to start getting fuzzy... She is a professional at this. As much as we hate her guts, the woman isn't stupid.
I do not recall
I cannot recall
I don't recall
I do not remember
I cannot remember
I don't remember
I do not have any recollection of that
I don't have any recollection of that
I have no recollection of that
Not that I can remember
Not that I can recall
Not that I remember
Not that I recall
The defense attourney is a fucking cunt.
It’s a judge...
Big oof from me
"What matter does it make what the intent of using the server was for" - literally the
defense lawyerjudge, even worseI thought that was the judge.....
Thought that was a judge
That was one of the judges.
How does the State Search relate to the Clinton Search? - Judge
well judge, the clinton lawyers decided what to provide to the State in the first place...you fucking doh doh cunt
This lady presenting the case sounds terrified.
It's normal to be scared right before you commit suicide.
She sounds flabbergasted the Judge is being so obtuse.
Which lady? JW or HC?
It really sounds like these judges don’t want to inconvenience Clinton any further to get to the truth. They have no proof outside of the State Department that all emails have been found, and the State Department has not proved they found all the emails. That is the basis of Judicial Watch’d argument but they could give a shit less.
Anyone have a link to who these judges are?
According to the YouTube description: Judges Griffith, Pillard, Wilkins
https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/home.nsf/Content/VL+-+Judges+-+TBG https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/home.nsf/Content/VL+-+Judges+-+NP https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/home.nsf/Content/VL+-+Judges+-+RLW
The dumb airhead sounding bitch is Pillard, who was appointed by 0bama of course. They used the "nuclear option" to confirm her and she was referred to as, "most extreme liberal nominees to the federal bench in decades"
Wilkins was also appointed by 0bama
Griffith was appointed by GWB
All libtard judges then. Bout sick of the compromised judicial branch
Full list of judges for the court is: https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/home.nsf/Content/Judges
SRI SRINIVASAN (Obama)
KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON (H. W. Bush)
JUDITH W. ROGERS (Clinton)
DAVID S. TATEL (Clinton)
MERRICK B. GARLAND (Clinton)
THOMAS B. GRIFFITH (W. Bush)
PATRICIA A. MILLETT (Obama)
CORNELIA T.L. PILLARD (Obama)
ROBERT L. WILKINS (Obama)
GREGORY G. KATSAS (Trump)
NEOMI RAO (Trump)
HARRY T. EDWARDS (Carter)
LAURENCE H. SILBERMAN (W. Bush)
STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS (Reagan)
DOUGLAS H. GINSBURG (Reagan)
DAVID B. SENTELLE (Reagan)
A. RAYMOND RANDOLPH (H. W. Bush)
4 Obama appointed judges out of 17 listed
What are the odds 2 of them are assigned to this case? Less than 5%
Thank you!
What’s interesting to listen to is this female judge constantly interrupting and belittling an up and coming female lawyer. Wonder what her stance on feminism is....
Well with those judges JW has no chance
So, legally knowledgeable 'pedes, what's the takeaway from this? I was working and only able to half-listen, so I was pretty lost.
Nothing was decided today then?
imagine expecting courts to make decisions on matters against democrat government officials
Ignorance is bliss.
This lady on HRC's side is a real bitch. So rude.
Why is the judge allowing her to be so confrontational and hostile toward JW?
She is a judge!!!
She's even more despicable then!
It is a panel of Judges. SHE is a judge.
Wow, that makes it even WORSE!
Everybody in this except for the JW rep is on HRC's side.