17
Comments (6)
sorted by:
2
Mrs_Fonebone 2 points ago +2 / -0

It already happened.

2
AussieSasquatch76 [S] 2 points ago +3 / -1

Didn’t realise. I’ve been trying to find a way back on twitter after being permabanned

2
Mrs_Fonebone 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, but you guessed correctly--it was a direct contradiction that it was pressure on the neck/asphyxiation. The original official autopsy was also revised to say that fentanyl was present as well as another drug. Curiouser and curiouser...

0
Marshall 0 points ago +1 / -1

Both autopsies will reach the same conclusion. Asphyxiation. But one will also have comorbidities which are irrelevant in this case. If he died after a brief struggle to restrain him, it would make a difference. But he was under control long before the knee came off. If he was violent enough, then shackles and handcuffs. But this was way past what was necessary. It's not even a close call.

That said, even the peaceful demonstrations are premature and violence and looting are NEVER protected. That is an insurrection.

0
AussieSasquatch76 [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

So, it was positional asphyxia and not a knee?

1
Marshall 1 point ago +1 / -0

The knee held him in the fatal position.