230 already regulates them. The Executive Order demands clarification on how to apply the regulations. Now we can sue them and force them in court to classify as either platform or publisher.
These big tech companies want to pick and choose what content is allowed on their site. Ok, they have that right as a private company.
That is called being a publisher. Companies that select what they want to publish, like book publishers, newspapers, blogs, or television stations, are responsible for the content that they publish. If it is defamatory, they must pay damages.
If they want to act like a publisher, picking and choosing what viewpoint to endorse, then they should be liable for defamatory content on their site. If they don't want to be liable for that, then they should stop censoring views that they don't like. It's the way the law works for everyone else, and that's how it should work for large social media companies.
Have the FCC close them down for inciting violence. Use their own argument against them. Make them argue that the President incited violence more than they did. It would be laughable
Sue them.
regulate big tech. they have too much power. use regulations to take it awayy
Make them responsible for spreading propaganda, censorship and creating violence. Send the CEOs to prison for what they are trying to do the country.
230 already regulates them. The Executive Order demands clarification on how to apply the regulations. Now we can sue them and force them in court to classify as either platform or publisher.
These big tech companies want to pick and choose what content is allowed on their site. Ok, they have that right as a private company.
That is called being a publisher. Companies that select what they want to publish, like book publishers, newspapers, blogs, or television stations, are responsible for the content that they publish. If it is defamatory, they must pay damages.
If they want to act like a publisher, picking and choosing what viewpoint to endorse, then they should be liable for defamatory content on their site. If they don't want to be liable for that, then they should stop censoring views that they don't like. It's the way the law works for everyone else, and that's how it should work for large social media companies.
Have the FCC close them down for inciting violence. Use their own argument against them. Make them argue that the President incited violence more than they did. It would be laughable
FCC doesn't have the legal authority, and the House isn't going to give it to them.