I know that's what I am saying. This was one day ago and I do not expect the media to cover it. Politico literally the ONLY one writing about the hearing itself.
the Twitter user who posted this said she got is from this Sarah Carter blog about the hearing:
Hillary Clinton lost the appeal. The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals submitted the case, which is adjourned until Wednesday, September 9 at 9:30 a.m., when the former Secretary of State will have to testify.
It seems oddly flippant to throw that into the last paragraph of the blog. I'm suspecting they had that prepared as an update and it slipped into the published blog? I don't know. I don't see anywhere that the Court actually made a ruling.
Wasn't this a ruling on a motion? It wasn't technically an appeal, was it?
I think Killary was just filing a motion to quash the subpoena compelling her to appear. If that motion was rejected, then the case (and subpoena) would proceed and she would be required to appear as ordered.
Can anyone confirm the DC Circuit court made a ruling? I'm not finding that anywhere. The hearing was just yesterday.
This is the first I've heard too, and I've been looking. Seems too good.
I can't find anything either other than the Sarah Carter blog post. I think this might just be smoke.
There was some private video on youtube with a title saying the same thing too.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/appeals-court-mulls-making-hillary-clinton-testify-on-emails/ar-BB14WoL8
Seems the court was leaning slightly in favor of JW. If this is an inside update then it would seem the judges ruled against Crooked.
Yes, I understand there was a hearing. There has not been a ruling on that hearing, to my knowledge.
I know that's what I am saying. This was one day ago and I do not expect the media to cover it. Politico literally the ONLY one writing about the hearing itself.
Check JW twitter or something.
Why the fuck does she get until September?
She needs 3 months to come up with her "public" position obviously.
Maybe other testimony needs to come first?
How was this not national news?!?! Oh... yeah...
Sticky this!
Is this true? Did she lose the appeal?
the Twitter user who posted this said she got is from this Sarah Carter blog about the hearing:
It seems oddly flippant to throw that into the last paragraph of the blog. I'm suspecting they had that prepared as an update and it slipped into the published blog? I don't know. I don't see anywhere that the Court actually made a ruling.
They wouldn't be able to guess at the date amd time of the next hearing though?
Rosie O'Donnell lets out a fart she's been holding in.
So basically Yellowstone.
Yukka flats after the blast
Username checks out once again.
Dude, you catch me every time. Thanks!
Kek!!!
I mean take a look at Fitton's triceps and you can guess how many barbells the globalists have tried to drop on him.
Her brother was so why not her.
Make it on Sept. 11 in NYC. We saw what the ghosts of 9/11 did to her 4 years ago.
This is interesting. Guess she won't be the messiah candidate when the Dems have the DNC convention in late Aug, she looks to be busy!
I have money on her to take the place of Biden, guess this makes it less likely
Confirmed? Sources?
Wasn't this a ruling on a motion? It wasn't technically an appeal, was it?
I think Killary was just filing a motion to quash the subpoena compelling her to appear. If that motion was rejected, then the case (and subpoena) would proceed and she would be required to appear as ordered.
I'll get out in front of her testimony; "I don't recall" :HRC
Tho that would be actual suicide.
I cannot find anything backing this up.
Mods?
I’ll believe it when/if it happens. Until then our country is a lawless satanic communist shithole.
Sept? I bet they'l play court tricks and get it delayed till after the election at which point it'l go poof
I don’t think the deep state gets justice unless there is a revolt.
Can we say “second wave”?