587
Comments (42)
sorted by:
23
dukiehazzard 23 points ago +23 / -0

Can anyone confirm the DC Circuit court made a ruling? I'm not finding that anywhere. The hearing was just yesterday.

16
King6of6the6retards 16 points ago +16 / -0

This is the first I've heard too, and I've been looking. Seems too good.

1
DarkMemeDuck 1 point ago +2 / -1

I can't find anything either other than the Sarah Carter blog post. I think this might just be smoke.

1
King6of6the6retards 1 point ago +1 / -0

There was some private video on youtube with a title saying the same thing too.

1
BoughtByBloomberg 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/appeals-court-mulls-making-hillary-clinton-testify-on-emails/ar-BB14WoL8

Seems the court was leaning slightly in favor of JW. If this is an inside update then it would seem the judges ruled against Crooked.

1
dukiehazzard 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, I understand there was a hearing. There has not been a ruling on that hearing, to my knowledge.

1
BoughtByBloomberg 1 point ago +1 / -0

I know that's what I am saying. This was one day ago and I do not expect the media to cover it. Politico literally the ONLY one writing about the hearing itself.

Check JW twitter or something.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
10
lustmorden 10 points ago +11 / -1

Why the fuck does she get until September?

14
fjobb 14 points ago +14 / -0

She needs 3 months to come up with her "public" position obviously.

2
LowbloodHighEnergyRI 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe other testimony needs to come first?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
10
AmericaFirstMAGA88 10 points ago +10 / -0

How was this not national news?!?! Oh... yeah...

Sticky this!

9
ChuckedBeef 9 points ago +9 / -0

Is this true? Did she lose the appeal?

12
dukiehazzard 12 points ago +12 / -0

the Twitter user who posted this said she got is from this Sarah Carter blog about the hearing:

Hillary Clinton lost the appeal. The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals submitted the case, which is adjourned until Wednesday, September 9 at 9:30 a.m., when the former Secretary of State will have to testify.

It seems oddly flippant to throw that into the last paragraph of the blog. I'm suspecting they had that prepared as an update and it slipped into the published blog? I don't know. I don't see anywhere that the Court actually made a ruling.

6
ChuckedBeef 6 points ago +6 / -0

They wouldn't be able to guess at the date amd time of the next hearing though?

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
2
AlexAmore 2 points ago +2 / -0

Rosie O'Donnell lets out a fart she's been holding in.

2
MrTrumpsWildRide 2 points ago +2 / -0

So basically Yellowstone.

2
1776-or-1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yukka flats after the blast

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
11
deleted 11 points ago +12 / -1
4
superfly 4 points ago +4 / -0

Username checks out once again.
Dude, you catch me every time. Thanks!

2
LowbloodHighEnergyRI 2 points ago +2 / -0

Kek!!!

2
MrTrumpsWildRide 2 points ago +2 / -0

I mean take a look at Fitton's triceps and you can guess how many barbells the globalists have tried to drop on him.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
4
Crlsniper 4 points ago +4 / -0

Her brother was so why not her.

4
realJohnMiller 4 points ago +4 / -0

Make it on Sept. 11 in NYC. We saw what the ghosts of 9/11 did to her 4 years ago.

3
Choctaw 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is interesting. Guess she won't be the messiah candidate when the Dems have the DNC convention in late Aug, she looks to be busy!

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Haz85 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have money on her to take the place of Biden, guess this makes it less likely

2
alienjesus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Confirmed? Sources?

1
nowrongwrong 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wasn't this a ruling on a motion? It wasn't technically an appeal, was it?

I think Killary was just filing a motion to quash the subpoena compelling her to appear. If that motion was rejected, then the case (and subpoena) would proceed and she would be required to appear as ordered.

1
Hedonismbot 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'll get out in front of her testimony; "I don't recall" :HRC

1
williammcfadden 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tho that would be actual suicide.

1
Lispychicken 1 point ago +1 / -0

I cannot find anything backing this up.

Mods?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
McBihog 1 point ago +2 / -1

I’ll believe it when/if it happens. Until then our country is a lawless satanic communist shithole.

1
PapaPepe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sept? I bet they'l play court tricks and get it delayed till after the election at which point it'l go poof

1
Drew 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don’t think the deep state gets justice unless there is a revolt.

1
mostlyatnight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can we say “second wave”?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0