I believe it was more the choking him/it by the (elevated) collar hold.
Also, the dog was not poisoned, threatened with poison, poison was only brought in during on line discussion, much later.
I too read the part of the evil black man who used doggie treats to entice owners to place their dogs back under their control.. as required by law (which had not been challenged by any of those involved, nor by any in news reports)
I'd bet you don't like my post do you? Will you consider the post which you replied to as a (poison) enticement on my part?
Why wouldn't you/one/other consider it as a non confrontational method of achieving a goal?
I must again post that the laws of this land are obeyed, not by/due to the consequences, but by the willingness of the people who allow others to make them.
Finally ... "facebook..........Bird watching pussie..." If I wasn't almost 70 years olds I'd say.........dude? really?
You miss the heart of the matter and i'll make it quite clear to you by using your own words and inserting the words you left out.
"too read the part of the evil black man who used ---------
------'''-' doggie treats to entice owners to place their dogs back under their control.. as required by law."
The words,of course being 'ostensibly poisoned.'
I'm happy to live in a society so safe and bounteous that one who does'nt understand a threat,when uttered, can live to such an advanced age.
Protecting your dog from being poisoned is not abuse.
I believe it was more the choking him/it by the (elevated) collar hold. Also, the dog was not poisoned, threatened with poison, poison was only brought in during on line discussion, much later.
He said, with treat in hand:"im going to do what im going to do and you wont like it. Come here doggie"
Bragged about it on his facebook page. Bird watching pussie bullying a woman.
I too read the part of the evil black man who used doggie treats to entice owners to place their dogs back under their control.. as required by law (which had not been challenged by any of those involved, nor by any in news reports)
I'd bet you don't like my post do you? Will you consider the post which you replied to as a (poison) enticement on my part?
Why wouldn't you/one/other consider it as a non confrontational method of achieving a goal?
I must again post that the laws of this land are obeyed, not by/due to the consequences, but by the willingness of the people who allow others to make them.
Finally ... "facebook..........Bird watching pussie..." If I wasn't almost 70 years olds I'd say.........dude? really?
You miss the heart of the matter and i'll make it quite clear to you by using your own words and inserting the words you left out.
"too read the part of the evil black man who used --------- ------'''-' doggie treats to entice owners to place their dogs back under their control.. as required by law."
The words,of course being 'ostensibly poisoned.'
I'm happy to live in a society so safe and bounteous that one who does'nt understand a threat,when uttered, can live to such an advanced age.
Bless you,brother (or sister,as the case may be)