Being against forced vaccinations can have nothing to do with autism. Both my wife and I had severe reactions to vaccines, and don't want our child to experience the same. Do we not have rights in America? Freedoms?
Bc we take in 1.5m immigrants a year, some from Bumfuckistan, and we don’t want it to return. Show me the problem with that vaccine before you bitch about it.
Is it the one about Bill Gates' polio vaccine leading to paralysis of nearly half a million children in India between 2000 and 2017? I'll bet it's good.
How do you know which vaccines fall into either of those two categories? Doesn't the very existence of "flawed vaccines" contradict into the blanket statement we hear repeated endlessly that "vaccines are safe and effective?"
Hunting rifles are safe and effective too, unless there is a problem with the weapon or the ammunition.
Vaccines are tools. Tools sometimes break. Tools are sometimes made wrong. Tools are sometimes used wrong. Tools can maim or kill people if there is an accident, for any reason.
Not to mention, he had financial interest in a company making mercury-free vaccines, and his medical license was revoked in the UK for his part in this.
He never even tried to say all vaccines are bad, only those containing mercury. The idiot anti-vaxxers grabbed onto his bullshit and ran even further with it than he did.
I'm not saying there aren't problems with some vaccines. The DTwP vaccine was vicious; I still have some nerve damage in my arm from the one I got in 1975.
But I didn't go running to the government for compensation.
(They withdrew that one, replaced with DTaP which is supposed to be safer.)
DTwP killed more children than mass shootings have.
Strange silence around that.
What I'm saying is there are some very real risks around vaccines and anyone who is unskeptical of Big Pharma and Big Government working together is a clueless dope.
Big Pharma has little to no liability on their vaccine products and they have Big Government mandating them some customers with 3rd party payers.
There's nothing wrong with being skeptical and curious about the pro-vaxx dogma.
Dude, I'm a pharmacist. It is literally my job to be skeptical about what comes out of the pharmaceutical industries. The first thing they taught us in pharmacy school was how to read medical literature, and read between the lines to see what they weren't saying.
This being said, my kids have been immunized with the required vaccines (DTaP, MMR, Hep A/B, meningococcus, et bloody cetera) but none of the optional ones. They haven't had any flu shots (neither have I, I'm licensed to give them but haven't taken one in my life), they're not getting Gardasil until they're 18 and old enough to make that decision for themselves, and they're especially not getting Bill Gates' vaccine, if he ever comes up with one. (As someone around here said, he can't keep viruses out of his own damn OS, how are we supposed to trust him with our bodies?) They were quarantined with my wife when she was home sick with COVID, and with me once I got home from the hospital (and the week before I went). If they didn't catch it from either of us, they're never going to.
(Pet peeve: the term "vaccine" specifically refers to smallpox; it's derived from the Latin name of the cowpox virus, which is what they made that from. Everything else is an immunization, but that's a linguistic battle I've long since lost.)
This was turning into an interesting discussion on vaccines. Please don't call people "idiots" just because they believe something different to you. It undermines your viewpoint and just breeds negative emotions. Calm down and state your case in a more "scientific" manner.
Yes, the whole "movement" is based on a paper that's now retracted. There's been no personal testimonies of harm. There's been no payouts to families whose child has been harmed. Remember, you should never read the insert, the pamphlet will tell you all you need to know. {Bill Gates smile} Be the first on your block to take the WuFlu vaccine. That's a good boy.
It's a lot more than "one paper," ignoring the massive amount of scientific studies and parent testimony that has happened since then is disingenuous. Watch the two Vaxxed documentaries, Del Bigtree's Vaccine Safety Project presentation, notice how pro-vax defenders never actually show up to debate these issues, they just repeat "safe and effective" ad nauseam and slander anyone who wants to ask questions.
By the way, Here is a number of tweets from Trump before he was elected questioning the link between vaccines and autism. Trump knows the truth and we should consider ourselves blessed for it.
Apparently it's anti vax to point out that I don't feel comfortable taking a vaccine that is literally being rushed to market so fast that normal processes will be ignored and or relaxed to get it out there asap
bro, we can at least partially agree that vaccines arent always effective and are used as a money grab (flu shots are only 40% effective in the best years) but everyone is told to get one and insurance always pays 100% to the manufacturer.
People think "peer review" actually means something important. Can't be further from the truth. Peer reviewing isn't a validation of your research. It's a rough cut to see if any glaring faux pas has been committed. The actual scientific discussion happens by competing papers.
We think it's important because the entire academic profession claims peer review as the basis for checks and balances on their fields of study. If peer review is a circle jerk, the academics need to stop committing fraud by claiming peer review is anything other than a old-boys-club rubber stamp.
2 weeks of "peer review" after it was published raised these questions
The study had a higher number of deaths than the known death count in austrailia (scientific data usually lags far behind real-world, unredacted data)
The study claimed invitermicin did a better job, yet at the time of the study, invitermicin wasn't a suggested remedy and is unlikely to have been used off-label in so many cases (they were still pushing people to ECMO or ventalators)
the study claimed to have access to tens of thousands of hospital records (maybe but hospitals don't just chuck data at every startup company who asks - later a reporter called every single hospital in austrialia, none of which knew about a partnership with that company - you think at least one of them would give an answer like "our partners go though appropriate vetting" but every single one flat ut denied a relationship)
The company says it was the hospital's job to redact data so data problems are the hospital's fault (hospitals would never do this, you want the data, you clean it up and pass it though board review)
These are major questions came by medical professional "peers" within days that actual "peer review" could have at least asked
Regarding 1-3, as I mentioned, the review process doesn't actually get into the validity of claims. Just sees if you've ticked a list of checkboxes.
Regarding 4, it sounds like this should have been caught.
That said, there are reviewers who are hardcore and care deeply about their review. But it's not the rule by any means and especially not outside of hard sciences (math, physics etc).
Academics sell "peer review" as the ultimate checks and balance on prohibiting junk science from entering the field.
I completely agree that actual peer review is basically spell check.
Peers in the medical profession began calling out this study almost immediately, why weren't they on the journal "peer review"? And we're back to spell checking.
I have a fam member with a phd in physics who stated unequivocally that peer review is a joke, and he has submitted hundreds of papers to be reviewed. It's basically gaming the system for research funds.
The same author using the same database also managed to publish in NEJM, concluding that you must hide yo gramma cause hydroxychloroquine is causing fatal arrhythmias in everybody out there... also retracted same day
Where does it say the authors were a Sci if writer and cam girl, because i can't find it. I searched the authors names but nothing came back aside from medical doctors
Same thing happened to me. I just linked them lancets retraction and I basically said it was found to have made up data. They couldn't argue because that's what the lancets retraction itself said.
They just responded "big yikes" lol and I decided not to push it. I prefer small doses of red pills instead of a full red suppository
Click bait headline with no or poor sourced materials (aka, total or mostly fiction)
Actual facts that should be sourced prior to publishing surface
(Maybe) issue a 10-word retraction; (maybe) a stealth edit.
The false cognitive anchor bias remains
Unfortunately, the media is using this scheme to condition and program the ANCHORING BIAS.
Example...
Trump said "very fine people" about racists in Charlottesville
Facts shows Trump categorically condemned the white supremists groups
(Some) media outlets report that
The Democrat Presidential Candidate, to this day, uses this provably false reference and the media repeats it (again) as if it were true.
This is classic Goebbels propaganda. The US Media is a LITERAL propaganda arm of the DNC. Nearly every form of their reporting (on paper, online, and te very questions they pose) are agitprop. Period.
thats the phrase I was trying to think of just now. People operate for decades on impressions and bad info. Twitter is founded on that, people emotionally overreacting to emotional overreactions and filling that sewer with a symphony of dumbassery
One of my friends had unfortunately been brainwashed into thinking Hydroxychlorquine doesn’t work. The shock in his eyes when I showed him studies that completely disproved what he had been told was moving. He isn’t necessarily based but he hates politicians in general and the government. He was one of those guys afraid to go outside until a vaccine was made but is waking up.
This entire Hydroxychloroquine kerfuffle has exposed the corrupt underbelly of so-called "science" in America. We already knew there was rampant corruption because of faux "climate science," but these people were willing to passively murder others by suppressing the use of an effective drug therapy. This is a whole new level of corruption.
Yeh based on this bullshit the dopey WHO recommend against use of hydroxychloroquine. The authors, peer reviewers and lancet should be held accountable.
Note the big red retracted all over it. It really should have a paragraph at the start in red saying this paper has been retracted because the data it is based on is bullshit.
Look up for Didier Rahoult’s comments on the VA “study”. It’s also a complete fraud. Paid by the NIH. Investigate if Fauci is behind the NIH payments for that one.
And the left all know this (the smart ones higher up the chain). Get any info out that can be used to hurt trump/right. If it turns out to be completely false, we do a tiny blip correction weeks or months later. No one will see the correction, nor care. Initial damage done. We all know rhis
And they didn't let the named first-author (because they needed credibility for publication) review the data.
The named first author didn't bother asking for the data to review.
The peer review process dind't ask if they'd reviewed the data
The Lancet editorial staff didn't bother with a simple question "have you reviewed the data"
The implications of this fraud put the HCQ doubters on par with the anti-vaxx movement
Yeah except the anti-vaxxers are the ones with doctors backing them up and the pro-vaccers are supported by Bill Gates and Merck.
Being against forced vaccinations can have nothing to do with autism. Both my wife and I had severe reactions to vaccines, and don't want our child to experience the same. Do we not have rights in America? Freedoms?
AGREED. Vaccinate if you want, but don't expect EVERYONE to agree that they should do the same. FREEDOM.
As severe as the diseases the cure?
Polio is effectively cured; handful of annual cases deep in bumfuckistan. Yet we still mandate all kids get it. why?
Bc we take in 1.5m immigrants a year, some from Bumfuckistan, and we don’t want it to return. Show me the problem with that vaccine before you bitch about it.
Have you ever watched a documentary about what Polio can do children?
Is it the one about Bill Gates' polio vaccine leading to paralysis of nearly half a million children in India between 2000 and 2017? I'll bet it's good.
https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2017/06/28/534403083/mutant-strains-of-polio-vaccine-now-cause-more-paralysis-than-wild-polio?t=1591385815800
Polio is a terrible disease.
Are you aware that polio vaccines are now the leading cause of polio in the world?
https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/polio-cases-now-caused-vaccine-wild-virus-67287290
I am aware that a substandard type of cheap vaccine causes a tiny percentage of people to develop the disease, yes.
Re-read the article a couple times and think about what it's actually saying.
I'm no science genius, but the entire movement against vaccines is not based on one retracted paper.
EXACTLY👆
Correct. It is based on one retracted study and a lot of stupid comparisons between flawed vaccines and well-made vaccines.
How do you know which vaccines fall into either of those two categories? Doesn't the very existence of "flawed vaccines" contradict into the blanket statement we hear repeated endlessly that "vaccines are safe and effective?"
Hunting rifles are safe and effective too, unless there is a problem with the weapon or the ammunition.
Vaccines are tools. Tools sometimes break. Tools are sometimes made wrong. Tools are sometimes used wrong. Tools can maim or kill people if there is an accident, for any reason.
Does that mean we should stop using all tools?
Careful, you might pull a muscle with that kind of stretching.
Not to mention, he had financial interest in a company making mercury-free vaccines, and his medical license was revoked in the UK for his part in this.
He never even tried to say all vaccines are bad, only those containing mercury. The idiot anti-vaxxers grabbed onto his bullshit and ran even further with it than he did.
Over $4B in tax-payer funds has been paid out to vaxx victims over the past few decades.
No one ever mentions that.
.. or the fact that CDC recommended childhood vaccines (schedule) were NEVER tested for safety as a cocktail (all-in-one) shots. Don't tell anyone ;)
I'm not saying there aren't problems with some vaccines. The DTwP vaccine was vicious; I still have some nerve damage in my arm from the one I got in 1975.
But I didn't go running to the government for compensation.
(They withdrew that one, replaced with DTaP which is supposed to be safer.)
DTwP killed more children than mass shootings have.
Strange silence around that.
What I'm saying is there are some very real risks around vaccines and anyone who is unskeptical of Big Pharma and Big Government working together is a clueless dope.
Big Pharma has little to no liability on their vaccine products and they have Big Government mandating them some customers with 3rd party payers.
There's nothing wrong with being skeptical and curious about the pro-vaxx dogma.
Dude, I'm a pharmacist. It is literally my job to be skeptical about what comes out of the pharmaceutical industries. The first thing they taught us in pharmacy school was how to read medical literature, and read between the lines to see what they weren't saying.
This being said, my kids have been immunized with the required vaccines (DTaP, MMR, Hep A/B, meningococcus, et bloody cetera) but none of the optional ones. They haven't had any flu shots (neither have I, I'm licensed to give them but haven't taken one in my life), they're not getting Gardasil until they're 18 and old enough to make that decision for themselves, and they're especially not getting Bill Gates' vaccine, if he ever comes up with one. (As someone around here said, he can't keep viruses out of his own damn OS, how are we supposed to trust him with our bodies?) They were quarantined with my wife when she was home sick with COVID, and with me once I got home from the hospital (and the week before I went). If they didn't catch it from either of us, they're never going to.
(Pet peeve: the term "vaccine" specifically refers to smallpox; it's derived from the Latin name of the cowpox virus, which is what they made that from. Everything else is an immunization, but that's a linguistic battle I've long since lost.)
Yes there is you moron.
DDG "DTaP Scream."
Shhhhh.. don't let the cats out.
This was turning into an interesting discussion on vaccines. Please don't call people "idiots" just because they believe something different to you. It undermines your viewpoint and just breeds negative emotions. Calm down and state your case in a more "scientific" manner.
Yes, the whole "movement" is based on a paper that's now retracted. There's been no personal testimonies of harm. There's been no payouts to families whose child has been harmed. Remember, you should never read the insert, the pamphlet will tell you all you need to know. {Bill Gates smile} Be the first on your block to take the WuFlu vaccine. That's a good boy.
It's a lot more than "one paper," ignoring the massive amount of scientific studies and parent testimony that has happened since then is disingenuous. Watch the two Vaxxed documentaries, Del Bigtree's Vaccine Safety Project presentation, notice how pro-vax defenders never actually show up to debate these issues, they just repeat "safe and effective" ad nauseam and slander anyone who wants to ask questions.
By the way, Here is a number of tweets from Trump before he was elected questioning the link between vaccines and autism. Trump knows the truth and we should consider ourselves blessed for it.
there are so many things Trump knows, i wish he had fewer enemies and more allies to really get things going.
Apparently it's anti vax to point out that I don't feel comfortable taking a vaccine that is literally being rushed to market so fast that normal processes will be ignored and or relaxed to get it out there asap
bro, we can at least partially agree that vaccines arent always effective and are used as a money grab (flu shots are only 40% effective in the best years) but everyone is told to get one and insurance always pays 100% to the manufacturer.
but gtfo with that flat-earth stuff
People think "peer review" actually means something important. Can't be further from the truth. Peer reviewing isn't a validation of your research. It's a rough cut to see if any glaring faux pas has been committed. The actual scientific discussion happens by competing papers.
We think it's important because the entire academic profession claims peer review as the basis for checks and balances on their fields of study. If peer review is a circle jerk, the academics need to stop committing fraud by claiming peer review is anything other than a old-boys-club rubber stamp.
2 weeks of "peer review" after it was published raised these questions
These are major questions came by medical professional "peers" within days that actual "peer review" could have at least asked
Regarding 1-3, as I mentioned, the review process doesn't actually get into the validity of claims. Just sees if you've ticked a list of checkboxes.
Regarding 4, it sounds like this should have been caught.
That said, there are reviewers who are hardcore and care deeply about their review. But it's not the rule by any means and especially not outside of hard sciences (math, physics etc).
I'm not disagreeing with you.
Academics sell "peer review" as the ultimate checks and balance on prohibiting junk science from entering the field.
I completely agree that actual peer review is basically spell check.
Peers in the medical profession began calling out this study almost immediately, why weren't they on the journal "peer review"? And we're back to spell checking.
I have a fam member with a phd in physics who stated unequivocally that peer review is a joke, and he has submitted hundreds of papers to be reviewed. It's basically gaming the system for research funds.
The anti vaxx movement has credibility. Anti HCQ does not. They are not equivalent.
IRONICALLY, the anti vaxx movement was started by a journal article published decades ago by.... THE LANCET! lol not kidding
The original article linking vaccines to autism years ago, was retracted, but so was this one
The same author using the same database also managed to publish in NEJM, concluding that you must hide yo gramma cause hydroxychloroquine is causing fatal arrhythmias in everybody out there... also retracted same day
Washed up sci fi author and cam girl stripper behind Lancet anti hydroxychloroquine “study” used by MSM and Govts worldwide is now retracted:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/03/covid-19-surgisphere-who-world-health-organization-hydroxychloroquine
https://www.zerohedge.com/health/researchers-retract-botched-anti-hcq-study-which-caused-who-halt-trials
https://twitter.com/TheLancet/status/1268613313702891523?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1268631528130502657&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.zerohedge.com%2Fhealth%2Fresearchers-retract-botched-anti-hcq-study-which-caused-who-halt-trials
https://hannity.com/media-room/breaking-now-medical-journal-retracts-study-that-found-hydroxychloroquine-dangerous-for-covid-patients/?utm_source=socialflow
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/04/unreliable-data-doubt-snowballed-covid-19-drug-research-surgisphere-coronavirus-hydroxychloroquine
https://www.axios.com/lancet-study-hydroxychloroquine-coronavirus-f0c3f35c-ad5e-4cea-9264-d1fd5bdce070.html?stream=politics&utm_source=alert&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=alerts_politics
What, no link to her cam, for the complete news story?
Skye daniels is her cam name.
Wow. That's actual hard science there... unlike the drivel she wrote.
i wish i had it
Where does it say the authors were a Sci if writer and cam girl, because i can't find it. I searched the authors names but nothing came back aside from medical doctors
yeah I'm lost on this point...
Same. It's kinda annoying every article seems to go out of their way to withhold this piece of information.
They call it "online cam girl" aka stripper
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/03/covid-19-surgisphere-who-world-health-organization-hydroxychloroquine
https://www.zerohedge.com/health/researchers-retract-botched-anti-hcq-study-which-caused-who-halt-trials
https://twitter.com/TheLancet/status/1268613313702891523?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1268631528130502657&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.zerohedge.com%2Fhealth%2Fresearchers-retract-botched-anti-hcq-study-which-caused-who-halt-trials
https://hannity.com/media-room/breaking-now-medical-journal-retracts-study-that-found-hydroxychloroquine-dangerous-for-covid-patients/?utm_source=socialflow
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/04/unreliable-data-doubt-snowballed-covid-19-drug-research-surgisphere-coronavirus-hydroxychloroquine
https://www.axios.com/lancet-study-hydroxychloroquine-coronavirus-f0c3f35c-ad5e-4cea-9264-d1fd5bdce070.html?stream=politics&utm_source=alert&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=alerts_politics
Ah thanks man.
That study got spread like wildfire, this one will get buried:
https://medicine.yale.edu/yigh/news-article/25085/
Gee, I wonder why
What annoys me is that most people will never see this. They'll be blaming the coronavirus on Trump for the rest of their lives.
I'm happy my CNN watching friend knew about this this morning. I assume not via CNN, but at least it got out to him.
thats a good one
My wife and her lib friend were citing this study to me last weekend. Pretty sad to fall for this fake of news.
Having an internal conflict between coming in amicably or going full I told you so hahahahahhahaa. Tbd
Sledgehammer?
Same thing happened to me. I just linked them lancets retraction and I basically said it was found to have made up data. They couldn't argue because that's what the lancets retraction itself said.
They just responded "big yikes" lol and I decided not to push it. I prefer small doses of red pills instead of a full red suppository
You have a bonus 'toljaso' awaiting use.
I wanted sexy, and you delivered. Gracias, amigo.
Courtney Herz (I could be wrong) is the name I found. Her Linkedin page is no longer available, no surprises there.
Ariane Anderson, Courtney Herz and Thomas Keonigsberger:
https://mobile.twitter.com/blvckovo/status/1268472956604342279
surgisphere's director of sales ariane anderson
https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/805464/viewall#/46303102
Ariane Anderson does porn under the name Skye Daniels, searchable under that name on p-hub
https://mobile.twitter.com/IkNihcas/status/1268685819692212224
Ariane Anderson's porn onlyfans is under the address @missdaniels
https://mobile.twitter.com/I3OUBA/status/1267111314855428097
The science is settled. She's a sexy retard.
Everything backfires on them. TDS is real pedes
The problem is ANCHORING BIAS.
This is the scheme behind media:
Unfortunately, the media is using this scheme to condition and program the ANCHORING BIAS.
Example...
This is classic Goebbels propaganda. The US Media is a LITERAL propaganda arm of the DNC. Nearly every form of their reporting (on paper, online, and te very questions they pose) are agitprop. Period.
This is the battle we fight.
thats the phrase I was trying to think of just now. People operate for decades on impressions and bad info. Twitter is founded on that, people emotionally overreacting to emotional overreactions and filling that sewer with a symphony of dumbassery
One of my friends had unfortunately been brainwashed into thinking Hydroxychlorquine doesn’t work. The shock in his eyes when I showed him studies that completely disproved what he had been told was moving. He isn’t necessarily based but he hates politicians in general and the government. He was one of those guys afraid to go outside until a vaccine was made but is waking up.
I'm glad to hear his tds is clearing up
So, The Lancet is basically the the Sc1entol0gy of medical journals then.
Seems like it
Fun fact- lancet was also the publication that did the original article linking vaccines to autism in 1998. It was retracted in 2010
Oh, that’s right! Thanks for the reminder, ‘pede.
apparently ...
I HATE THE FUCKING MEDIA
People taking medical advise from strippers, and taking political advise from pornstars and celebrities. Lol This world is crazy
The ccp/msm jumped all over this too
Wonder why people don't trust the media
This entire Hydroxychloroquine kerfuffle has exposed the corrupt underbelly of so-called "science" in America. We already knew there was rampant corruption because of faux "climate science," but these people were willing to passively murder others by suppressing the use of an effective drug therapy. This is a whole new level of corruption.
For science I need to know who is this stripper?
I'm still loking for that, started my morning looking for her image, was going to put it in this but ....
Democrats: You must believe
ScienceStrippers!Secret secrets hurt no one...
Clown world has exceeded the most imagined honk limit
but there will be a tomorrow
But it would have owned Le Drumf!!!11!
libs "the party of science" is almost as big of a joke as islam "the religion of peace"
u forget that women are the gender of peace
I'm fully convinced that we'd be at war with at least three countries if Hillary were president right now.
Lancet should be sued out of existence along with those responsible for the bullshit data.
Yeh based on this bullshit the dopey WHO recommend against use of hydroxychloroquine. The authors, peer reviewers and lancet should be held accountable.
They tried to make a product for medical students, but it was full of errors.
There are only two employees, and they make up additional names pretending to be up to six people when selling the product.
https://forums.studentdoctor.net/threads/surgisphere.572452/
Do we have pics of the stripper? It’s important that we get all of the facts to this news.
Can someone please link some sauce I can share with my friends who need to see this? Thank you.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31180-6/fulltext
Note the big red retracted all over it. It really should have a paragraph at the start in red saying this paper has been retracted because the data it is based on is bullshit.
Thanks man
where's the stripper name?
"online cam girl"
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/03/covid-19-surgisphere-who-world-health-organization-hydroxychloroquine
https://www.zerohedge.com/health/researchers-retract-botched-anti-hcq-study-which-caused-who-halt-trials
https://twitter.com/TheLancet/status/1268613313702891523?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1268631528130502657&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.zerohedge.com%2Fhealth%2Fresearchers-retract-botched-anti-hcq-study-which-caused-who-halt-trials
https://hannity.com/media-room/breaking-now-medical-journal-retracts-study-that-found-hydroxychloroquine-dangerous-for-covid-patients/?utm_source=socialflow
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/04/unreliable-data-doubt-snowballed-covid-19-drug-research-surgisphere-coronavirus-hydroxychloroquine
https://www.axios.com/lancet-study-hydroxychloroquine-coronavirus-f0c3f35c-ad5e-4cea-9264-d1fd5bdce070.html?stream=politics&utm_source=alert&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=alerts_politics
Outstanding! Thanks!
That's his "I already knew, and let you publicly hang yourself" look
GEORGE FLOYED CURED CORONAVIRUS BOYS
uh.... hero? LOL
Look up for Didier Rahoult’s comments on the VA “study”. It’s also a complete fraud. Paid by the NIH. Investigate if Fauci is behind the NIH payments for that one.
... Which they have since retracted for having bad original sources.
And the left all know this (the smart ones higher up the chain). Get any info out that can be used to hurt trump/right. If it turns out to be completely false, we do a tiny blip correction weeks or months later. No one will see the correction, nor care. Initial damage done. We all know rhis
exactly - people go on impressions and keep them for decades
TFW you don't know what 'TFW' means.
A stripper wouldn't be as bad. It was a cam model!
Is this Scientology?
Did somebody say stripper?
So uhh...when can people sue because grandpa died over their bullshit study?
I’m skeptical that water will keep me alive.
I’m skeptical the earth is round.
-some genius
Fucking idiots the lot of you.
pages 46 to 108 https://formerfedsgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/20201212-Filed-complaint.pdf
Kinda like Scientology 😆
Since when is Snopes doing medical research?
PEER REVIEWED Science!!!!!!
strippers look great in nurse costumes! just sayin.
Was it written by Snopes?