3041
Comments (193)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
136
r_u_srs_srsly 136 points ago +142 / -6

And they didn't let the named first-author (because they needed credibility for publication) review the data.

The named first author didn't bother asking for the data to review.

The peer review process dind't ask if they'd reviewed the data

The Lancet editorial staff didn't bother with a simple question "have you reviewed the data"

The implications of this fraud put the HCQ doubters on par with the anti-vaxx movement

57
WishdoctorsSong 57 points ago +74 / -17

Yeah except the anti-vaxxers are the ones with doctors backing them up and the pro-vaccers are supported by Bill Gates and Merck.

52
deleted 52 points ago +74 / -22