608
Comments (34)
sorted by:
17
GenericInsult 17 points ago +17 / -0

Further: Since it was legal at the time the cops did it, they should not have been charged with anything.

9
zwiebelsaft 9 points ago +9 / -0

That should change in the future, but agreed with your statement.

3
King6of6the6retards 3 points ago +3 / -0

Heard on the radio they got rid of chokes and neck restraints today.

9
RandomBoomer 9 points ago +9 / -0

It was legit so they must acquit. Minneapolis riots 2.0 just in time for the election

5-311 USE OF NECK RESTRAINTS AND CHOKE HOLDS (10/16/02) (08/17/07) (10/01/10) (04/16/12)

DEFINITIONS I.

Choke Hold: Deadly force option. Defined as applying direct pressure on a person’s trachea or airway (front of the neck), blocking or obstructing the airway (04/16/12)

Neck Restraint: Non-deadly force option. Defined as compressing one or both sides of a person’s neck with an arm or leg, without applying direct pressure to the trachea or airway (front of the neck). Only sworn employees who have received training from the MPD Training Unit are authorized to use neck restraints. The MPD authorizes two types of neck restraints: Conscious Neck Restraint and Unconscious Neck Restraint. (04/16/12)

Conscious Neck Restraint: The subject is placed in a neck restraint with intent to control, and not to render the subject unconscious, by only applying light to moderate pressure. (04/16/12)

Unconscious Neck Restraint: The subject is placed in a neck restraint with the intention of rendering the person unconscious by applying adequate pressure. (04/16/12)

PROCEDURES/REGULATIONS II.

The Conscious Neck Restraint may be used against a subject who is actively resisting. (04/16/12) The Unconscious Neck Restraint shall only be applied in the following circumstances: (04/16/12) On a subject who is exhibiting active aggression, or; For life saving purposes, or; On a subject who is exhibiting active resistance in order to gain control of the subject; and if lesser attempts at control have been or would likely be ineffective. Neck restraints shall not be used against subjects who are passively resisting as defined by policy. (04/16/12) After Care Guidelines (04/16/12) After a neck restraint or choke hold has been used on a subject, sworn MPD employees shall keep them under close observation until they are released to medical or other law enforcement personnel. An officer who has used a neck restraint or choke hold shall inform individuals accepting custody of the subject, that the technique was used on the subject.

3
JackLemon [S] 3 points ago +4 / -1

It was legit so they must acquit..

OK I am going to use that great line even though it will likely get me banned on the various news sites comment sections. It's too good not to.

6
sorrytodisagree 6 points ago +6 / -0

Like those poor bastards will get a jury unbiased enough to acquit them of anything.

4
POTUS_DonnieJ 4 points ago +4 / -0

Unless its a setup. That unimaginable for it to be a Dem plot to overcharge them and get them acquitted by design in order to get people to destroy the country again.

4
sorrytodisagree 4 points ago +4 / -0

Doesn't need to be a setup to acquit them. The knee hold didn't kill George Floyd, they weren't racist in any way, called him an ambulance, and followed dept policy. An unbiased jury would acquit them all and they'd get settlements for wrongful termination and defamation.

2
King6of6the6retards 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think they are simply putting this in their hand to play whichever way the want. A fair trial has plenty of reasonable doubt. The dem shit hole judicial railroad could hang them in a week. It's done enough for now, they can dust it off once they need it again

9
IAmAnElephante 9 points ago +9 / -0

HOLY fuck i literally said this to my friends last night. I believe riots v2 will occur when they are acquitted for a defense attorney's wet dream of over charging. Problem is, I think V2 will be suburbs where the Violence has escalated

1
Joaniev9 1 point ago +1 / -0

And right in time for election.... they'll make sure to speed up the trial.

1
PapaBoner 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ultimately, the Feds should be able to get him on a charge that sticks, but (regrettably) I agree with you that there will be V2 that will be much worse than we see now.

6
JackLemon [S] 6 points ago +7 / -1

I say yes. After that autopsy report there is no way they can convict Chauvin on Murder 2 and the former DNC leader and Antifa member Keith Ellison knows it. In a fair trial all of the officers will be acquitted just as in the Rodney King case in LA and the Freddy Gray case in Baltimore. That SOB Ellison and other Dimms want more riots. They are planning to try to make it happen which is why Ellison overcharged the cops.

4
zwiebelsaft 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'll say it once, I'll say it again- putting Ellison as this guy's prosecutor is like putting Roy Moore as Kerry Max Cook's. Pretending he's anything but biased is asinine.

3
empiretc 3 points ago +3 / -0

Agreed

4
Tremendous_Trump 4 points ago +4 / -0

i told my liberal friend about tony timpa and she said it didnt count because he was on drugs. I then said Floyd was on drugs and she said i was wrong. the left is so stupid

4
PartandParcel 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes, I do.

4
Shwoogin 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah 100%

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
Wiseguy235 3 points ago +3 / -0

Who cares....fck the "Pandemic"...fck the details on this...

...let`s just spread this shit globally now and burn anything down.Then start blaming it on Trump next week. (...again - nobody took it last time. sadly.) Focus.

2
RedReddit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes.

2
SCP0073 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes

2
usernametaken 2 points ago +6 / -4

My current theory is that Chauvin did murder Floyd but it had nothing to do with racism.

Chauvin injected Floyd with the fentanyl and simply waited for him to die. He didn't expect this to "blow up" like it did.

Both were part of a conterfeit ring/drug money laudering at the strip club, His brother in law (another cop who initially arrested Floyd) let him know Floyd was passing money since he was out of "work" due to wuhan flu. Floyd needed shut up at any cost.

Things that support this are Chauvin's home in Florida. Something he could never afford on a cop's salary. The radio station owned by the strip club owner and the police station both burning to destroy evidence and the recent CBP bust of conterfeit dollar bills. Almost no one conterfeits those but if you did, a strip club would be the perfect place to launder them.

Another theory is that Chauvin wasn't a dirty cop but undercover as part of a sting to trace conterfeit money used to support terrorism and Floyd OD'd on his own.

1
Thedaythe_redditdied 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don’t agree with you but with the small amount of info we have hell I won’t rule it out. We are lied to non stop, who knows. You don’t deserve the down votes though.

-4
deleted -4 points ago +1 / -5
-5
zwiebelsaft -5 points ago +1 / -6

Are you retarded?

2
TheBusiness 2 points ago +2 / -0

The only charge that may stick until more information comes out it manslaughter and only for the guy viewed on his neck. I dont think any of the officers will get a charge that sticks. These guys will never be police officers again but will probably remain out of jail. More to the story and videos to come.

2
7.62swinebuster 2 points ago +2 / -0

YES. The verdict will be coordinated to drop very close to the election.

1
SirPokeSmottington 1 point ago +2 / -1

I don't know where you're getting your "facts" from, but 2.75ng/ml is nowhere near a fatal dosage.

All you have to do is read a couple studies at most, and you'll see that you have a mean of 27ng/ml concentrations found in post-mortem. Or TEN TIMES what you are claiming is fatal.

Are you mixing up your ng (NANOGRAMS) with mg (MILLIGRAMS)? Because LD50 is considered to be 2 MILLIGRAMS.

Quit spreading #FAKENEWS

0
JackLemon [S] 0 points ago +2 / -2

I don't know where you're getting your "facts" from..

You don't know? Do you also suffer from attention deficit syndrome as well? I've already shown elsewhere that you're slow, so I'll have to walk you through it using simple steps 1) try reading the tweet I posted. It is that big image just below the title and 2) I am not Paul Sperry.

it is good that you fled to Google to search for more information about something you know absolutely nothing about, but bear in mind Google is corrupt, biased and unreliable. It is always better to search the journals but I doubt a fake scientist like you has access to them.

Paul Sperry is usually a reliable and trustworthy source of information, but journalists are well known for misreporting scientific information. It could be possible he screwed up.

However, as before you failed to cite any sources exposing yet again that you have no clue about how to properly cite data or information. Why would anyone trust what you report over what Paul Sperry did?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Trumper007 1 point ago +1 / -0

two of the officers had been on the streets 3 days and were just out of training. Who was there training officer "The Killer Cop" lol. Who knew.

2
MehNahMehNah 2 points ago +2 / -0

That, the fact that killer cop knew Floyd and maybe there is some sketchy history/backstory here...

Fatal amounts of Fentanyl? Crooked Trayvon Martin lawyer involved?

This gets weirder by the day. Jesse Walters speculated there could've been some type of hit involved.

1
RexKingofScots 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yes. Head to the country when they read the verdict.