I agree with your concerns, however, even if Trump agrees with you and decides to replace Barr he won't do so until after the election.
Replacing him now vs five months and a day from now doesn't accomplish enough to overcome the potential political liability. Post election that math changes drastically though.
We won't know what GEOTUS really thinks about Barr until Nov 6th, IMO.
I see both sides of the argument on Barr, but I'm not going to pretend I know better than GEOTUS or his people when it comes to making that call.
That's their job and the reason I voted for them.
Ultimately I think if he's dirty then they know it and will replace him.
Barr is the best that PT could do with a very corrupt Senate. But between hopefully landslide wins for him AND the Senate and a Grenell gambit, maybe we can get an outsider appointed who will actually DELIVER justice.
I agree with your concerns, however, even if Trump agrees with you and decides to replace Barr he won't do so until after the election.
Replacing him now vs five months and a day from now doesn't accomplish enough to overcome the potential political liability. Post election that math changes drastically though.
We won't know what GEOTUS really thinks about Barr until Nov 6th, IMO.
I see both sides of the argument on Barr, but I'm not going to pretend I know better than GEOTUS or his people when it comes to making that call.
That's their job and the reason I voted for them.
Ultimately I think if he's dirty then they know it and will replace him.
That might be naive, we'll see.
You are 100% right.
Barr is the best that PT could do with a very corrupt Senate. But between hopefully landslide wins for him AND the Senate and a Grenell gambit, maybe we can get an outsider appointed who will actually DELIVER justice.
This is the better method, they should do it this way.
Great call, easy to sell too.