1823
Comments (133)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
160
20KAG20 160 points ago +162 / -2

The silent majority is hitting a tipping point. I feel it myself as well, the hypocrisy and double standards shown during these riots proves we’ve been lied to. Ignoring it proves you are a sheep, it’s just too blatant.

The questions is, what happens next? Defunding the police would be a very interesting next step.

50
deleted 50 points ago +51 / -1
43
Supersaiyanbroly737 43 points ago +43 / -0

Things get complicated if you mix in the gangs, who are also well-armed. You've seen what they are capable of with the police available. No police means that those violent thugs can do what they want all day.

35
SpaceRussian 35 points ago +35 / -0

Basically major cities will come to resemble literal war zones as gangs and Neighborhood Militias fight over the city.

32
Supersaiyanbroly737 32 points ago +32 / -0

Neighborhood Militias have to go to their day jobs during the day.

Gangsta Thugs have all day. Lootin' and rapin' is their full time job, along with the occasional drug running. Not just talking about Chicago and LA gang here, those drug cartels and MS-13 have firepower, too (thanks Obama).

23
kiowachief 23 points ago +23 / -0

Those gang members lack any training or discipline. They will be mowed down like the rest.

20
deleted 20 points ago +20 / -0
8
Supersaiyanbroly737 8 points ago +8 / -0

That's true right now. But if there's profit to be made in looting, 2-3 years from now, those thugs will military-like training to maximize profits. Think African child soldiers and ISIS slave-traders.

13
GrabLifeByThePussy 13 points ago +13 / -0

The police dont have teeth to go after armed gangs the way vigilantes would. Protocol, rules, warrants, etc. I group of well trained patriots with AR15s and no qualms about killing could make short work of criminals. We outnumber them severely.

7
MightyBright 7 points ago +7 / -0

This is absolutely true. Everyone in the community knows that one trash family in the neighborhood that lives off crime and welfare handouts that the police never do anything about. A gang of pissed off locals could solve the problem in an afternoon if the government weren't keeping private citizens on such a short leash.

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
13
Supersaiyanbroly737 13 points ago +14 / -1

But you have to go to work during the day. Those thugs' main source of livelihood is too loot your houses. And they have all day.

You don't have to imagine what happens without a police force. It's already happening elsewhere. Parts of Mexico (where the cartel owns the police). Africa and their tribal wars.

8
NACAM 8 points ago +8 / -0

The patchwork of fiefdoms reminds me of what's described in Snowcrash. Good book. No way I'd want to live it.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
27
VoteCyborgTrump2040 27 points ago +27 / -0

That's the funniest part of all this. In a world without police, they would be absolutely obliterated. The only thing that is keeping them safe is law and order.

Take a look at how the cops and system always let Antifa off, while punishing groups like the Proud Boys. And how they let rioters off, but send people to jail for defending themselves. If someone knew they could shoot these piece of shit looters and extremists without consequences, they'd be gone in a week at most.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +3 / -4
39
boxmakingmachines 39 points ago +39 / -0

The questions is, what happens next? Defunding the police would be a very interesting next step.

LOL, like leftists want to stop government spending.

LOL.

This is a plan for a nationalized police force.

Of course, they can't just come out and say that. No one would go for it. Instead, they make some grandiose promises of 'social workers' who posses un-naturally fast physical response times and will then just 'talk it out' with all involved and 'provide all necessary resources' to help solve the conflict.....

Except that the city and state can't afford this ultra cool and progressive 'community police force', so now it becomes a 'federal responsibility' to pay for it. All of a sudden, not providing people with an outright symbol of fascism (nationalized police) is considered 'racist' and 'xenophobic'. And the NPCs will nod in agreement to all of it.

19
HaleyNunes2024 19 points ago +19 / -0

It's a scary possibility. Seems like it's been in the works for awhile. Obama selected Minneapolis as a 'test city' for federal policing.

7
20MagnusKonrad20 7 points ago +7 / -0

This one has the gift of foresight.

5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
11
sickofaltspin 11 points ago +11 / -0

Leftists/Globalists use street protests/violence like a thermostat, because their foot soldiers are collectivists, they can ramp up the heat and turn it down pretty gradually and consistently.

Individualists on the Right are harder to manipulate in incremental steps, unlike the left's thermostat, the right tends to be an on/off switch. God help us if they keep pushing to the point that god fearing patriots feel they are at the point they need to go hot, because it will be swift, brutal and bloody. And sadly it's tough to get the switch turned off once it is tripped.

May cooler heads prevail.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
AR15 4 points ago +4 / -0

What next? We win the election and the house. Then the radical left will crank up the rioting. That may be a tipping point.

1
Arwyn3x 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don't you see, they intend to prevent the November election, the Chinese Communist Party is behind this and things are going to get rough.

Who among the Traitors will finally say "enough" - Brennan, Clapper, Comey. Yates, the lovers, GW Bush, never Mitt Romeny or the Chinese owned Tom Arnold who calls for violence against we who support our President - but is there hope for the Catholic Archbishop Gregory or Chief Justice Roberts?