the left has always been saying that we shouldn't be listening to the words a sleeve owning old white men. they have always wanted to dismantle the Constitution using that as an excuse. The Constitution was set up and it prevented them from pushing their radical Communist revolution. without the constitution in the way they could do whatever they wantedd
"What do you know of fear? Fear is for the winter, my little lord, when Chyna releases a biological weapon upon the world, and the CDC prohibits us from leaving our homes. Fear is for the long night, when ANTIFA sacks and burns our great cities, and the mayors kneel in compliance. In that darkness the Democrats came for the first time. They swept through cities and kingdoms, riding their dead horses, hunting with their packs of pale spiders big as hounds..."
When you try for years to reason and debate, only to continuously be called racist or Nazi, when you use facts and studies and they never do. Or if they do, it's from a HEAVILY biased source that can be debunked, but they don't care.
The era of reason and debate ended when Obama won. When he drone striked American citizens and Innocents without trials. When cops were killing blacks at over three times the rate they do today (and were still killing more whites).
When Obama and the Clintons were all saying marriage could only be between a man and a woman.
But remember, Trump, who is on record as far back as the 80s winning equality awards and saying he didn't mind gay marriage, is the violent, racist, homophobic one.
While the leftist icons are treated as pariahs, and the television interviews and speeches showing otherwise are removed from search results.
The left cannot meme. The left cannot debate. The left cannot reason.
This will only end one way. Minneapolis is not the end, it's the beginning.
Also most Zoomers are aware of this BS thanks to sites like 4Chan (before it taken over by glowies), as a result most of them are libertarians and are vehemently against these authoritarians.
Yeah but guess where all the museums and paintings and historical documents of our culture and past are at? I’ll give you a hint: They aren’t near farms.
facts don't matter to the left and trying to use them on the left isn't going to work. The left understands one thing and that's violence. They will not listen to your mouthh. The only thing they will listen to iis your fist
Doesn't matter. Anyone that had anything to do with slavery in the past will be judged through the lens of presentism, and without consideration for anything other than their ties to slavery, with everything else, including consideration for the time in which they were alive, disregarded.
They already destroyed the statue of Edward Colston in England, pulled it down and tossed it into the river. The only thing that mattered was his involvement in the slave trade. No mention that he was a merchant (of far more goods, not just a slave trader), a philanthropist, responsible for a ton of schools, boarding schools, churches almshouses and donations for pretty much everything good in London during his time (many charities still existing today), etc.
I think that's why us logical folks, who are able to follow all this to its logical conclusion, understand that the entire destruction of modern, civil society is their ultimate goal. There is no end, especially in an ideology built on "progressivism." There is no end in sight, and every bit of history must go, as social injustice is ubiquitous, in varying capacity, in every society that has ever existed. It just so happens they want to start with tearing down the society that has, without question, the least amount of social injustice ever seen in human history
In my mind this is why it's vital to control your language in discourse. These people are not "liberal" in any sense of the word and it does a great disservice to the actual classical liberals to lump them in with Bolshivek revolutionaries. Progressive at least encapsulates what they are all about. The steady march of progress towards their dystopian goals.
I agree, but I've also gotten in a debate on this board over how the word "liberal" has been coopted, where today it means something different -- the opposite really -- of its intended definition. I agree it's a huge issue, and I myself am even a liberal in the traditional sense (and by definition), but I will only identify myself as a "liberal" to the small audience of people that understand that (but I also do my best to not call progressive leftists "liberal," either. At least I can do my best to not contribute to the perversion of the word). Because ultimately, I know that most of society has a different view of what a "liberal," is. Person I was arguing with was not happy with me, but I kept trying to make the point that.... I agreed, it just wasn't a hill I was willing to die on, arguing with people about what a real liberal is. To me, it'd be like me also trying to tell people I'm an antifascist... because I am against/anti-fascism... but in today's lexicon it means something else, so I'd rather just not argue it (if that makes sense).
While not the greatest analogy, I also compared it to the swastika. Today, it has a different meaning, as the nazis coopted what was once a symbol of peace. It no longer means that. But I'd rather just not wear a swastika around as a representation of peace while trying to explain to people the real meaning and history. Unfortunately, the memory and definition of things can be manipulated and change over time, and while the definition and history is still the most important aspect to truth-seekers like myself, societal perception isn't something I can overcome as an individual. And thus, I don't wear a shirt with certain symbols, I don't tell people I'm anti-fascist (even though I'm against fascism) and I don't tell people I'm a liberal (even though I am, in the true sense) unless I know they have the same understanding of the word as I do.
Whoops, didn't mean to write this much, hope I made enough sense lol
No, I see leftists forcing them to claim all Ancient Egyptians were black in spite of scientific evidence (some of which is very recent) but of course that would be deemed "hate facts".
If I remember correctly, I remember reading that Washington., his family and his staff treated his slaves very well and more than fair (for the time). And that his slaves were proud of the man that Washington has become in his senior years.
Whether that would get blasted for revisionist history, I have no idea. But there is something that's ringing this bell in the back of my mind.
Well, when you read what the "critical race theory" proponents have been saying since the 90's, there's a lot talk about dismantling (destroying) everything since the enlightenment. That is there stated goal, it's not a theory, BLM is a hate group that literally wants everything to return to the dark ages.
Yup, this is basically a subset of Critical Theory (your Horkheimers, Marcuses, Foucaults, Gramscis, etc), and Critical Theory has taken over the entirety of academia. It started just with liberal arts and humanities, but the ideology has taken over the entire college campus in U.S culture, infiltrating even STEM and business programs, largely through infiltrating things like H.R., program coordinators, diversity/multiculturalism programs, etc. This was the foundation for spreading cultural marxism, and it's since (and as a result of academia) spread into all of our major institutions: academia, media, hollywood/entertainment, tech companies, video games, etc
It isn't easy, that's for sure (and I deal with this kind of research daily, and am also on the editorial board of one of these peer-reviewed academic journals, so I have insider knowledge/insight into the politics of it all. You are right not to trust). They've began doing the same thing as the media, they just do a better job at it: there are gatekeepers, the research outcomes are predetermined (and ditched/not published if they have "findings" that go against their desired narrative or outcomes), they have an ideological (political/cultural) bias (or they don't get published), and like media, they genuinely do use objective/truthful data and research, but they then use those objective facts to substantiate a subjective opinion (as their "conclusion") but then present it as an objective fact. Ultimately, you can trust the research in some capacity, so long as you are able to discern the objective facts/stats in the research from the bullshit conclusions they draw based on those facts
A very oversimplified example of how it works, is this hypothetical:
culture and politics (typically one "side," so we'll label this a progressive cause, as is usually the case) accepts that swimming in shallow water near beaches is dangerous (made up hypothetical), and discouraging beach-swimming, even shaming beach-goers, has become part of the progressive cause. Wealthy research organization (that receives donations from progressives, as well as some company that benefits if people don't swim at beaches -- and also donates to the DNC themselves) that also has a vested interest in say... getting beaches shut down by scaring people away from going -- provides a grant to a marine biologist to study shark attacks. They want the research to find that you are more prone to shark attacks in shallow water (because of aforementioned vested interest, as well as cultural/political aim). Researcher will compile data and do a quantitative analysis that shows, factually, that 95% of shark attacks happen in shallow water within 300 feet of shore. They will then conclude that shallow waters are more dangerous, and one is more likely to be killed by a shark at their local beach than at deep sea. When in reality, it's just that 99.999% of swimmers are in shallow water, and thus most shark attacks happen here, even though it's rare, and you're more likely to encounter a shark deep at sea. If you actually draw that logical conclusion, you are stripped of funding and your research isn't published (or accepted by "peer-review" [gatekeepers])
there's a lot talk about dismantling (destroying) everything since the enlightenment. That is there stated goal, it's not a theory, BLM is a hate group that literally wants everything to return to the dark ages.
Stop exaggerating and stick to facts. You're no better than r/politics. You really think BLM wants to take the US back to the "dark ages"? Really?
I doubt they want to do that. The puppet masters probably do, though. I think the BLM too dense to realize the things they advocate would take us there. They're the useful idiots.
The left's control over higher education is the root of the whole problem. As long as they control that territory, we'll be fighting our own children for our own freedom forever.
If nothing can be done about that, then we have no future.
The other day I thought how funny it would be if someone jokingly started a movement for more hurricanes being given black names and it actually worked. Hurricane Taneisha, Hurricane DeAndre, they have a certain ring to them.
I predict before to long they will demand a new country formed. Its the easy way to get rid of the Constitution and wipe the guilt away. Ill bet about 30% already support this, how long before 55%?
Who wouldn't support just letting Hitler annex the Sudetenland and Austria peacefully? The alternative is another World War. These people are totalitarians at heart; they will not tolerate any difference in thought or way of life. They will not stop when we have appeased them. All we will accomplish by doing so is to lose territory, and abandon the good folks who live in those areas.
That's not an option ether because leftists want it all, thus they'll never agree to peace separation because they can't allow people who aren't in lockstep with their ideology to exist. Remember: they want to gulag all "wrong-thinker", no if, ands, or buts.
They don't want that because the areas of the country that actually produce something won't want to be part of the areas that are socialist. It's kind of like the state of Jefferson in California. It's not the upper half staying in, it's the lower half not letting go of that sweet sweet tax money.
Trump is our modern Lincoln trying to free us all from the slavery of the deep state. If the democrats want to try secession again, we will fight to uphold the union again.
First they came for the city folk and I did nothing because I don’t live in a city. Whether self inflicted due to voting for democrats or not, most people don’t want what’s going on.
Making peace with evil only delays inevitable conflict. Evil must be crushed. Hopefully it will be peacefully, I pray that people will wake up to the evil that is these leftist, but the union will not fall.
No. Evil people don't get to just infiltrate our country and then strip whole sectors of it away until there's nothing left. The United States of America stands as it is with all 50 states.
Can confirm. Heard leftist talking heads on radio, back during Charlottesville, attempting to smear Jefferson "because he owned slaves" with utter disregard to history and facts.
I eagerly await someone calling me a white supremacist over on something like Reddit, because then I can tell them I'm a Japanese-American and that they can take their racism and shove it up their ass.
That never works, they assume you're larping. The ones who don't probably don't make a distinction between white and Asian, not black/brown, then you white.
If they go after him, conservatives need to go after Woodrow Wilson, LBJ, FDR, and Bill Clinton (there are schools and roads named after him).
The judging of people by today's fucked up standards is fucking gross and cowardly. It is the worst and most narrow-minded of historiography. It has no place in academia if it is being done to purposely confuse or effectively erase history. That's the reason the 1619 Project is such a fucking farce-- actively rewriting history and not too many historical scholars are doing much about it.
If they could in any way get access to Mt. Vernon, they would burn that house to the ground along with everything in it, all while chanting and dancing around the flames like screeching savages.
Destroying America has been the Globalist agenda for a century. In order to get Americans to accept One World Government, Americans have to lose their Sovereignty. Only way to do that is to destroy the economy.
I dont care if he did. It was a different time, i’m not about judge people from 400 yrs ago by today’s standards. I’m not white but my family owned slaves at a point. Does that makes me racist today?
It's not about morality or slavery or anything else. It's only about destroying everything that ties us to the past so they can recreate the future in their image.
What do you mean soon?! They’ve wanted to do this for years. I remember when they first started pulling down Confederate statues, some BLMs were talking about destroying the Washington monument.
Not the left. Global Communist Elites who control the left. You're aiming at the wrong target. The left is simply an extension of the agenda. But so are the controlled RINO's. It is a "purple" deep state that seems to overthrow our Republic!
They already want to destroy Washington's mark on history, but they can't. And if a day comes when they can, then they already have the country. This isn't something they will have to try to do, if you follow my drift here.
There's a reason Mao was out to completely eradicate the history and culture of China so he could remake it in his own image. They are literally following in Mao's footsteps.
Until the 19th century everyone all over the world for all of humanity enslaved everyone else regardless of what hue of color their epidermis was, twas was way of the land. America broke the tradition.
Back during Charlottesville, I overheard on the radio some leftist buffoon attempting to character assassinate Thomas Jefferson because he owned slaves. Nevermind that Jefferson treated his slaves as best he could and didn't even like the practice of slavery if he could have done anything about it.
The extent to which the left is ignorant and/or in denial of history and facts is really astonishing. Nobody insults our Founding Fathers, least of all for bullshit like this.
We need a group to put the Confederate statues back. Robert E. Lee the gentleman soldier who spent the rest of his life in support of reconciliation,The deeply religious Stonewall Jackson(who was reportedly against slavery himself) the scrappy tactician and master of small unit and maneuver warfare who poured his blood out for his native soil of Virginia. Men great and small who met on the field of battle to resolve the great question of the Union, many who but for the accident of birth were on the wrong side. This is American history and the marxist cunts on the left are stealing from all of us and your posterity. In the national gallery, there is the legendary stylized statue of the death of Tecumseh, who fought against the United States but is recognized because he was joined in battle with American history as a worthy adversary and recognizing the tragedy of circumstance.
If anyone genuinely cared about slavery, they would be killing muslims and burning all the mosques since muslims are still enthusiastic advocates of and participants in slavery today.
Its hatred of all white people that drives this. Not because they are bad, or evil, or good even, its hatred of their race.
What they're coming for is the Constitution itself. They'll say slave owners wrote it and it's time to rethink and restructure our nation from the ground up.
Trump directly called them out on that less than a year after he took office. When the latest pissy-fit was tearing down statues because feelings were hurt, he made the remark that Jefferson owned slaves and said they'd probably start demanding that the Jefferson Memorial be destroyed. Fast forward a few weeks and people are demanding that memorials/statues of Thomas Jefferson be taken down.
He inherited the slaves and it was illegal to free slaves that you owned.
My sweet summer child
"The Whiteness of John Brown: a Study of Privilege in the Abolitionist Movement."
You know it's coming if it's not already here.
the left has always been saying that we shouldn't be listening to the words a sleeve owning old white men. they have always wanted to dismantle the Constitution using that as an excuse. The Constitution was set up and it prevented them from pushing their radical Communist revolution. without the constitution in the way they could do whatever they wantedd
John Brown was a radical abolitionist who lead violent slave revolts.
But he was white, so he wasn't woke enough by today's standards I'm sure.
"What do you know of fear? Fear is for the winter, my little lord, when Chyna releases a biological weapon upon the world, and the CDC prohibits us from leaving our homes. Fear is for the long night, when ANTIFA sacks and burns our great cities, and the mayors kneel in compliance. In that darkness the Democrats came for the first time. They swept through cities and kingdoms, riding their dead horses, hunting with their packs of pale spiders big as hounds..."
Oh shit, winter came.
This is the blackpill.
When you try for years to reason and debate, only to continuously be called racist or Nazi, when you use facts and studies and they never do. Or if they do, it's from a HEAVILY biased source that can be debunked, but they don't care.
The era of reason and debate ended when Obama won. When he drone striked American citizens and Innocents without trials. When cops were killing blacks at over three times the rate they do today (and were still killing more whites).
When Obama and the Clintons were all saying marriage could only be between a man and a woman.
But remember, Trump, who is on record as far back as the 80s winning equality awards and saying he didn't mind gay marriage, is the violent, racist, homophobic one.
While the leftist icons are treated as pariahs, and the television interviews and speeches showing otherwise are removed from search results.
The left cannot meme. The left cannot debate. The left cannot reason.
This will only end one way. Minneapolis is not the end, it's the beginning.
The Second Amendment is the last thing we have left. When debate is off the table, the bullets will do the talking.
I'm worried about the youth. The vast vast majority of them are heavily indoctrinated. What will it take to sway them? Once they start to vote...
Also most Zoomers are aware of this BS thanks to sites like 4Chan (before it taken over by glowies), as a result most of them are libertarians and are vehemently against these authoritarians.
The main concern would be the new definition of "Left" or "Right" or if that would even exist in the next few decades
Yeah but guess where all the museums and paintings and historical documents of our culture and past are at? I’ll give you a hint: They aren’t near farms.
*without cheating
yes they can. I'm pretending they cantt is a surefire way for you to lose
facts don't matter to the left and trying to use them on the left isn't going to work. The left understands one thing and that's violence. They will not listen to your mouthh. The only thing they will listen to iis your fist
Doesn't matter. Anyone that had anything to do with slavery in the past will be judged through the lens of presentism, and without consideration for anything other than their ties to slavery, with everything else, including consideration for the time in which they were alive, disregarded.
They already destroyed the statue of Edward Colston in England, pulled it down and tossed it into the river. The only thing that mattered was his involvement in the slave trade. No mention that he was a merchant (of far more goods, not just a slave trader), a philanthropist, responsible for a ton of schools, boarding schools, churches almshouses and donations for pretty much everything good in London during his time (many charities still existing today), etc.
Soon, when Egyptologists bring their exhibits around, the left will surely demolish them, as the Pharaohs owned slaves.
One glance at Islamic history will tell you that. They've been slavers from the start and still are today but no one seems to care about that.
I think that's why us logical folks, who are able to follow all this to its logical conclusion, understand that the entire destruction of modern, civil society is their ultimate goal. There is no end, especially in an ideology built on "progressivism." There is no end in sight, and every bit of history must go, as social injustice is ubiquitous, in varying capacity, in every society that has ever existed. It just so happens they want to start with tearing down the society that has, without question, the least amount of social injustice ever seen in human history
In my mind this is why it's vital to control your language in discourse. These people are not "liberal" in any sense of the word and it does a great disservice to the actual classical liberals to lump them in with Bolshivek revolutionaries. Progressive at least encapsulates what they are all about. The steady march of progress towards their dystopian goals.
I agree, but I've also gotten in a debate on this board over how the word "liberal" has been coopted, where today it means something different -- the opposite really -- of its intended definition. I agree it's a huge issue, and I myself am even a liberal in the traditional sense (and by definition), but I will only identify myself as a "liberal" to the small audience of people that understand that (but I also do my best to not call progressive leftists "liberal," either. At least I can do my best to not contribute to the perversion of the word). Because ultimately, I know that most of society has a different view of what a "liberal," is. Person I was arguing with was not happy with me, but I kept trying to make the point that.... I agreed, it just wasn't a hill I was willing to die on, arguing with people about what a real liberal is. To me, it'd be like me also trying to tell people I'm an antifascist... because I am against/anti-fascism... but in today's lexicon it means something else, so I'd rather just not argue it (if that makes sense).
While not the greatest analogy, I also compared it to the swastika. Today, it has a different meaning, as the nazis coopted what was once a symbol of peace. It no longer means that. But I'd rather just not wear a swastika around as a representation of peace while trying to explain to people the real meaning and history. Unfortunately, the memory and definition of things can be manipulated and change over time, and while the definition and history is still the most important aspect to truth-seekers like myself, societal perception isn't something I can overcome as an individual. And thus, I don't wear a shirt with certain symbols, I don't tell people I'm anti-fascist (even though I'm against fascism) and I don't tell people I'm a liberal (even though I am, in the true sense) unless I know they have the same understanding of the word as I do.
Whoops, didn't mean to write this much, hope I made enough sense lol
You ignore liberals were always a problem. This is going back to stage 1 cancer, in effect.
An sheit!
No, I see leftists forcing them to claim all Ancient Egyptians were black in spite of scientific evidence (some of which is very recent) but of course that would be deemed "hate facts".
How unequivocally dare you suggest they weren't kangz n sheit, sir!
How did he treat his slaves then?
If I remember correctly, I remember reading that Washington., his family and his staff treated his slaves very well and more than fair (for the time). And that his slaves were proud of the man that Washington has become in his senior years.
Whether that would get blasted for revisionist history, I have no idea. But there is something that's ringing this bell in the back of my mind.
The only proper and reasonable explanation in here.
You know who else owned slaves? Blacks and native Americans
Well, when you read what the "critical race theory" proponents have been saying since the 90's, there's a lot talk about dismantling (destroying) everything since the enlightenment. That is there stated goal, it's not a theory, BLM is a hate group that literally wants everything to return to the dark ages.
Yup, this is basically a subset of Critical Theory (your Horkheimers, Marcuses, Foucaults, Gramscis, etc), and Critical Theory has taken over the entirety of academia. It started just with liberal arts and humanities, but the ideology has taken over the entire college campus in U.S culture, infiltrating even STEM and business programs, largely through infiltrating things like H.R., program coordinators, diversity/multiculturalism programs, etc. This was the foundation for spreading cultural marxism, and it's since (and as a result of academia) spread into all of our major institutions: academia, media, hollywood/entertainment, tech companies, video games, etc
It isn't easy, that's for sure (and I deal with this kind of research daily, and am also on the editorial board of one of these peer-reviewed academic journals, so I have insider knowledge/insight into the politics of it all. You are right not to trust). They've began doing the same thing as the media, they just do a better job at it: there are gatekeepers, the research outcomes are predetermined (and ditched/not published if they have "findings" that go against their desired narrative or outcomes), they have an ideological (political/cultural) bias (or they don't get published), and like media, they genuinely do use objective/truthful data and research, but they then use those objective facts to substantiate a subjective opinion (as their "conclusion") but then present it as an objective fact. Ultimately, you can trust the research in some capacity, so long as you are able to discern the objective facts/stats in the research from the bullshit conclusions they draw based on those facts
A very oversimplified example of how it works, is this hypothetical:
culture and politics (typically one "side," so we'll label this a progressive cause, as is usually the case) accepts that swimming in shallow water near beaches is dangerous (made up hypothetical), and discouraging beach-swimming, even shaming beach-goers, has become part of the progressive cause. Wealthy research organization (that receives donations from progressives, as well as some company that benefits if people don't swim at beaches -- and also donates to the DNC themselves) that also has a vested interest in say... getting beaches shut down by scaring people away from going -- provides a grant to a marine biologist to study shark attacks. They want the research to find that you are more prone to shark attacks in shallow water (because of aforementioned vested interest, as well as cultural/political aim). Researcher will compile data and do a quantitative analysis that shows, factually, that 95% of shark attacks happen in shallow water within 300 feet of shore. They will then conclude that shallow waters are more dangerous, and one is more likely to be killed by a shark at their local beach than at deep sea. When in reality, it's just that 99.999% of swimmers are in shallow water, and thus most shark attacks happen here, even though it's rare, and you're more likely to encounter a shark deep at sea. If you actually draw that logical conclusion, you are stripped of funding and your research isn't published (or accepted by "peer-review" [gatekeepers])
"dark ages"...
How dare you, sir- how absolutely, categorically, precisely, positively, unconditionally and unambiguously DARE you???!!!
Funny, that's the same time period the muslims keep wanting to cling to as well.
Stop exaggerating and stick to facts. You're no better than r/politics. You really think BLM wants to take the US back to the "dark ages"? Really?
I think so. Maybe they don't think that will happen but they'd be wrong, as usual
I doubt they want to do that. The puppet masters probably do, though. I think the BLM too dense to realize the things they advocate would take us there. They're the useful idiots.
US colleges are the reason we have democratic strongholds. They're infiltrated with anti American professors and communist agendas.
Can confirm, Marxism is a part of every humanities class. Every major has a humanities requirement. These universities receive your tax money.
What can be done about it?
Nothing
The left's control over higher education is the root of the whole problem. As long as they control that territory, we'll be fighting our own children for our own freedom forever.
If nothing can be done about that, then we have no future.
I still wanna know who had the idea to put a bat on the new quarter
The other day I thought how funny it would be if someone jokingly started a movement for more hurricanes being given black names and it actually worked. Hurricane Taneisha, Hurricane DeAndre, they have a certain ring to them.
I predict before to long they will demand a new country formed. Its the easy way to get rid of the Constitution and wipe the guilt away. Ill bet about 30% already support this, how long before 55%?
Who wouldn't support just letting Hitler annex the Sudetenland and Austria peacefully? The alternative is another World War. These people are totalitarians at heart; they will not tolerate any difference in thought or way of life. They will not stop when we have appeased them. All we will accomplish by doing so is to lose territory, and abandon the good folks who live in those areas.
That's not an option ether because leftists want it all, thus they'll never agree to peace separation because they can't allow people who aren't in lockstep with their ideology to exist. Remember: they want to gulag all "wrong-thinker", no if, ands, or buts.
They don't want that because the areas of the country that actually produce something won't want to be part of the areas that are socialist. It's kind of like the state of Jefferson in California. It's not the upper half staying in, it's the lower half not letting go of that sweet sweet tax money.
Trump is our modern Lincoln trying to free us all from the slavery of the deep state. If the democrats want to try secession again, we will fight to uphold the union again.
First they came for the city folk and I did nothing because I don’t live in a city. Whether self inflicted due to voting for democrats or not, most people don’t want what’s going on.
Making peace with evil only delays inevitable conflict. Evil must be crushed. Hopefully it will be peacefully, I pray that people will wake up to the evil that is these leftist, but the union will not fall.
No. Evil people don't get to just infiltrate our country and then strip whole sectors of it away until there's nothing left. The United States of America stands as it is with all 50 states.
Ditto Thomas Jefferson.
They have been trying.
Can confirm. Heard leftist talking heads on radio, back during Charlottesville, attempting to smear Jefferson "because he owned slaves" with utter disregard to history and facts.
History? Facts? These are things only you white supremacists bring up
I eagerly await someone calling me a white supremacist over on something like Reddit, because then I can tell them I'm a Japanese-American and that they can take their racism and shove it up their ass.
That never works, they assume you're larping. The ones who don't probably don't make a distinction between white and Asian, not black/brown, then you white.
If they go after him, conservatives need to go after Woodrow Wilson, LBJ, FDR, and Bill Clinton (there are schools and roads named after him).
The judging of people by today's fucked up standards is fucking gross and cowardly. It is the worst and most narrow-minded of historiography. It has no place in academia if it is being done to purposely confuse or effectively erase history. That's the reason the 1619 Project is such a fucking farce-- actively rewriting history and not too many historical scholars are doing much about it.
They already did in Canada, they replaced John A Macdonald (our founder and first PM) with some obscure black woman on our money.
We call it Cuckada for a reason.
Leftists love trying to re-write history! One day this man will be seen as a fictional character in Colleges.
Known this for years. Seeing BLM destroy monuments, set the flag on fire and not denounce suchs actions is all I need to know of those terrorists.
Already hapening. Christ Church in Alexandria announced they are removing the GW plaque honoring his founding of the church. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/oct/27/george-washingtons-church-tear-down-memorial-honor/
2017, so fairly old news at this point. Of course, that doesn't change that this rewriting of history is sickening.
If they could in any way get access to Mt. Vernon, they would burn that house to the ground along with everything in it, all while chanting and dancing around the flames like screeching savages.
If that happens, Patriot militias better kill every last one of the savages or I can rightly say Fuck the militia movement.
Yeah, but they also wanna enslave US.
Project 1619. They already started revisionist history.
Destroying America has been the Globalist agenda for a century. In order to get Americans to accept One World Government, Americans have to lose their Sovereignty. Only way to do that is to destroy the economy.
They'll just change the source. We're named after Denzel now.
Or Leonard. He’s from a little town called none of your goddam business
George Washington Carver.
I dont care if he did. It was a different time, i’m not about judge people from 400 yrs ago by today’s standards. I’m not white but my family owned slaves at a point. Does that makes me racist today?
It's not about morality or slavery or anything else. It's only about destroying everything that ties us to the past so they can recreate the future in their image.
What do you mean soon?! They’ve wanted to do this for years. I remember when they first started pulling down Confederate statues, some BLMs were talking about destroying the Washington monument.
Freedom begins when America dies.
4 Chan needs to start a meme to tear up all your money because it has slave owners on it
Not the left. Global Communist Elites who control the left. You're aiming at the wrong target. The left is simply an extension of the agenda. But so are the controlled RINO's. It is a "purple" deep state that seems to overthrow our Republic!
Alright Alex, we have marked your words. Bill Clinton is a rapist!
But..but.. but Netflix said Trump was there so Trump is a rapist too!
Reeeeeeeeeeeee!!!
Just like the French Revolution
They already want to destroy Washington's mark on history, but they can't. And if a day comes when they can, then they already have the country. This isn't something they will have to try to do, if you follow my drift here.
There's a reason Mao was out to completely eradicate the history and culture of China so he could remake it in his own image. They are literally following in Mao's footsteps.
Wait until they find out that Native Americans took slaves too
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
They won't even get close if that black pill. Imagine the debate being well not all slave owners were bad...
Until the 19th century everyone all over the world for all of humanity enslaved everyone else regardless of what hue of color their epidermis was, twas was way of the land. America broke the tradition.
ahem ottoman empire ahem coughs in patriotism
100 % they will try this. 100 fucking percent.
Back during Charlottesville, I overheard on the radio some leftist buffoon attempting to character assassinate Thomas Jefferson because he owned slaves. Nevermind that Jefferson treated his slaves as best he could and didn't even like the practice of slavery if he could have done anything about it.
The extent to which the left is ignorant and/or in denial of history and facts is really astonishing. Nobody insults our Founding Fathers, least of all for bullshit like this.
We need a group to put the Confederate statues back. Robert E. Lee the gentleman soldier who spent the rest of his life in support of reconciliation,The deeply religious Stonewall Jackson(who was reportedly against slavery himself) the scrappy tactician and master of small unit and maneuver warfare who poured his blood out for his native soil of Virginia. Men great and small who met on the field of battle to resolve the great question of the Union, many who but for the accident of birth were on the wrong side. This is American history and the marxist cunts on the left are stealing from all of us and your posterity. In the national gallery, there is the legendary stylized statue of the death of Tecumseh, who fought against the United States but is recognized because he was joined in battle with American history as a worthy adversary and recognizing the tragedy of circumstance.
Already had this argument with the previous neighbors...thank God I moved
If anyone genuinely cared about slavery, they would be killing muslims and burning all the mosques since muslims are still enthusiastic advocates of and participants in slavery today.
Its hatred of all white people that drives this. Not because they are bad, or evil, or good even, its hatred of their race.
What they're coming for is the Constitution itself. They'll say slave owners wrote it and it's time to rethink and restructure our nation from the ground up.
We have shills on here trashing Lincoln because he was racists in some threads I have seen. They’re trying for their little cultural revolution.
It has already begun
https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-george-washington-san-francisco-mural-20190628-story.html
https://www.foxnews.com/us/hofstra-activists-want-to-remove-thomas-jefferson-statue
Trump directly called them out on that less than a year after he took office. When the latest pissy-fit was tearing down statues because feelings were hurt, he made the remark that Jefferson owned slaves and said they'd probably start demanding that the Jefferson Memorial be destroyed. Fast forward a few weeks and people are demanding that memorials/statues of Thomas Jefferson be taken down.
They're coming for all of western civilization. Calling us racist is just a means of bullying people into submission.
GEOTUS called it in 2017: "Are we going to take down Statues of George Washington?"