HARD FACT: Hispanics and then black officers are more likely to shoot an unarmed black suspect as compared to a white officer.
Stats for unarmed blacks shot by cops:
https://www.phillypolice.com/assets/directives/cops-w0753-pub.pdf
Page 32
Definition of OIS (Officer involved shooting) is on page 17
Definition of TPFs (threat perception failures) is on page 30
TPF of white officer against black suspect is 6.8
TPF of black officer against black suspect is 11.4
TPF of hispanic officer against black suspect is 16.7
Aka Hispanics and then black officers are more likely to shoot an unarmed black suspect. The claim that white officers are more likely to kill black suspects is complete bullshit. White cops are the least likely to kill unarmed blacks. (Stats for asian cops isn't available as it's negligible.)
Also even after adjusting for population:
https://www.pnas.org/content/116/32/15877
There is widespread concern about racial disparities in fatal officer-involved shootings and that these disparities reflect discrimination by White officers. Existing databases of fatal shootings lack information about officers, and past analytic approaches have made it difficult to assess the contributions of factors like crime. We create a comprehensive database of officers involved in fatal shootings during 2015 and predict victim race from civilian, officer, and county characteristics. We find no evidence of anti-Black or anti-Hispanic disparities across shootings, and White officers are not more likely to shoot minority civilians than non-White officers. Instead, race-specific crime strongly predicts civilian race. This suggests that increasing diversity among officers by itself is unlikely to reduce racial disparity in police shootings.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1948550618775108?journalCode=sppa
Is there evidence of a Black–White disparity in death by police gunfire in the United States? This is commonly answered by comparing the odds of being fatally shot for Blacks and Whites, with odds benchmarked against each group’s population proportion. However, adjusting for population values has questionable assumptions given the context of deadly force decisions. We benchmark 2 years of fatal shooting data on 16 crime rate estimates. When adjusting for crime, we find no systematic evidence of anti-Black disparities in fatal shootings, fatal shootings of unarmed citizens, or fatal shootings involving misidentification of harmless objects. Multiverse analyses showed only one significant anti-Black disparity of 144 possible tests. Exposure to police given crime rate differences likely accounts for the higher per capita rate of fatal police shootings for Blacks, at least when analyzing all shootings. For unarmed shootings or misidentification shootings, data are too uncertain to be conclusive.
WSJ article on the myth of systematic police racism:
What we should be doing is providing more mental health help to cops and stop burdening cops with everything. Watch this Larry Elder video and listen to what the police chief says after 5 minute mark. Don't be part of the problem - be part of the solution. If you think there are issues in policing, join the police youself and help improve it.
Tribal group hates other tribal group, news at 11,000 B.C.
Old news...
For me, the most horrifying statistic that came out of the analysis of San Diego police shootings was that half of them were mentally ill.
That, for me, is a big, fat target.
Numbers of deaths at the hands of police have been dropping since that report was made public. I've been trying to find the relevant news story online, but can't get it to surface.
Half the shooters or half the victims?
It kind of makes sense though... Somehow a mentally deficient person ends up in a confrontation with the police, is behaving erratically, and not complying with orders... Because they simply don't comprehend.
Doesn't matter, because the system itself is designed by and for white people, and irredeemably racist.
What white people are dealing with in America today is very similar to how Jews were treated in pre and early WWII Nazi Germany. The only reason it hasn't descended to more widespread violence, yet, is because unlike the Jews we have numbers, and guns.
There was nothing the Jews could do to appease the racist zeal that was sweeping their country. They tried, God how some of them tried. Even once the atrocities started, some of them still tried. They tried, and they died all the same. Because when the foundation of someone's interaction with you is believing that you're a sub-human monster, nothing you say will ever matter. They're only talking to you because they don't have the courage to try and kill you yet.
Don't think BLM believes whites are sub-human monsters? I would invite you to spend some time on Black Twitter.
They have the courage to kill you.
They just dont have the means to facilitate a genocide but if the "Silent Majority" stays silent and Trump loses, give it 10-15 yrs when you'll become South Africa 2.0
This is it. They're playing the long game. I don't think they're smart enough to conspire, per se, but this is presumably what accompanies a demographic transition in a nation when the ascending group holds multigenerational hatred and resentment.
The BLM leadership is just mercenary. The followers I honestly don't think look down on us as subhuman. I think they are just an angry sort of people with shitty attitudes. They are all bluster because they a. believe we really are better than them and somehow feel inferior to us and are angry about it and b. want someone to blame and whine about so they don't ever have to take personal responsibility and work hard. Now Chinese, THEY look down on us as subhuman. At least here in California. They look at us like they own us.
What the followers believe really doesn't matter, though. They're followers, by definition they do what they're told. The people in charge, the ones setting the narrative, are all-in on the Critical Race Theory, everything-is-the-white-man's-fault narrative.
For what it's worth I've also interacted with plenty of the followers who are fully infected with this theory, too. It's a very attractive idea, if you're an angry black person: Everything is someone else's fault, you can't be blamed for anything, and you never have to examine your own beliefs for bias and hate, because you aren't capable of either.
It's a recipe for genocide.
Yep. Fresh video of that happening:
https://streamable.com/unt61m
Silence is violence. Heard that one yet? Cracks me up.
It IS a cult! The Cult Dynamics of “Wokeness”. An interesting read.
CNN definitely doesn't like you seeing this
these facts are not CNN approved
stay tuned for more updates
No Asian cops?
The report explains that. It's because of lack of asian cops and asian victims.
On page 26, only 1% of suspects (armed and unarmed) shot were asian.
On page 22, 0% of cops involved in OIS were asian.
On page 31 that there was only 1 time when an unarmed Asian was shot. So the data is negligible:
They don't care. Democrats will be like this...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=myWaa6xvPZ4
CNN: POC officers are 2.5 times better at providing protection than White officers, according to the facts.
My theory is that everybody knows the truth and is a race realist to some extent and then people are corrupted to be suicidal by political correctness to whatever degree they are susceptible.
I'm genuinely shocked to see that hispanic officers are more likely to shoot black subjects than black officers.
I would have assumed black>hispanic>asian/other>white officers in willingness to shoot black subjects. I interpret that to be the inverse "susceptibility to suicidalism/leftism" hierarchy.
Well it doesn't help when we have female officers...they will lose in hand to hand and must reach for a weapon.
Totally agree, cops have to be tough.
The only downside is that they also have to protect their weapons. Meaning that if an unarmed suspect engages, they are now fighting the suspect and protecting their weapons from being taken. So if the cop trips and fall to the ground, even a smaller, weaker suspect may be able to get their weapons. Then that cop has made this situation more dangerous for everyone.
Now if the cop goes Andy Taylor on them, then that's better.
There's probably an easy solution to make a gun only fire when in the hands of its owner, like a small radio beacon.
Or like Thor's hammer, but something could be done.
Obviously my example applies to the cop being alone.
Are you serious? Gangs don’t fight police with fists lol. The second a gang member see a cop, he will shoot the cop.
Ah, I see you are a Hate Pact purveyor as well. Quite exquisite