2538
Comments (196)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
Kekistan_United 2 points ago +2 / -0

lol. right on. idiocracy indeed.

i always pose the question to people that often reference it.

who was making all the products for the shelves of the mega stores?

anyway.

i always felt like i prefer idiocracy, because smart folks [like they do now] would

have fled to their own, easily controlled pastures.

i also didnt like the notion that it assumes smart people were only born to other

relatively smart people...

and to that i would posit, that Isaac Newton's parents were just normies.

that most of the brilliant minds in our histories were born to regular folk.

idiocracy required that a small percentage of those people would never be born

that it always derives on a negative slope, to zero.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
Kekistan_United 2 points ago +2 / -0

indeed.

the idiocracy plot requires that no smart children can ever be born to dumb/regular folks; was my argument