How about separating from the left? You know, judge people by the content of their character? I know I know, a truly racist idea, stolen straight from KKK-headperson MLK!
In my book, people of any skin color are welcome, as the problems reside on the inside (in their head), if any, and not on the outside.
Well I agree and I also agree that if Hungary, Poland and whatever country, country, town or community wants to stay 98%+ white Christians that's all fine with me.
I just said about my personal view on this.
Freedom of association means the world to me! That includes the freedom to non-association 😉
Be called brave/nazi by who? I thought by now everyone would understand the left acts hypocritically. The solution is not to become more like the left, it is to become less like the left.
In your example, we can say both groups are Nazis if they use violence against peaceful people bc of their race.
The alt-right=left-wing propaganda. Don’t fall for it my friend.
In this situation it's fairly obvious the left are the problem. It's an interesting paradox that it's the left demanding people mix together, making it so whether people want it or not, but then are also the cause for all the friction that makes people mixing together not feasible.
I do not believe this is accidental. You see the fruits of their labour in Yugoslavia, Libya and Syria. Greatly due to their input people in those countries could no longer live together and they're become fragmented into a series of separatist regions.
At this point I've so disgusted by the examples I see from the left and reached the point of realising it's often futile to try to reason with them that I think they actually deserve Hitler.
Hitler got the death camps right. It was the Jews that he got wrong. The the left are super paranoid about Hitler they see him everywhere and I don't think that's a coincidence. Jews themselves are often confused as to why so many non-Jews are so paranoid of Hitler and see him around every corner. The left are even more afraid of Hitler than the Jews. The Jews have a reason at least but what about the left? What could that be? Why don't the Jews exhibit this irrational fear of Hitler in any significant number despite history but the left does? The left fears Hitler because that's what they deserve. It's a manifestation of their inner psyche.
Why are they so mortally afraid of Nazis who were wiped out? Why are they so obsessed with a tiny minority of weird people who cosplay nazis and that are virtually pacifists?
Because the left deserves Nazis. They're terrified of them the same way a criminal is terrified of the police.
I cannot bring myself to sympathise with these people at all anymore. If we don't have the left, sure, even muslims aren't a threat but when we have the left we can't have nice things. We can't afford diversity or multiculturalism and the left as it is now at the same time.
The left fear Nazis because they are Nazis. They are Nazis that don't know enough history to realize that they are replaying the rise of the brownshirts.
Look at the nascence of Nazism in Germany in the ´20s and ´30s. You see the same marches, the same aggression, the same demand for government to finance the people. For the Nazis the Jews were the scapegoat enemy. For today's Nazis it is the white middle class that is the enemy.
There is an important distinction, the Jews were not armed....
Bruh, you have it backwards. The radicals are home-grown Americans. Do they try to use diversity for propaganda? Sure, but only because that’s how you virtue-signal to other WHITE people.
we know this is ideological because the riots all occur in Democratic states and democratic cities. There is plenty of diversity in many GOP strongholds that did not turn violent.
You can afford diversity. You can’t afford Democrats. Luckily, you can move to a red state!
I don’t believe any human being deserves to be dehumanized. I also believe that torture is wrong(people who deserve torture will be tortured in hell. “Vengeance is the Lords”). But there are people(perhaps many people) who deserve death.
Don’t lose your hope! Have you ever seen the rope-a-dope strategy in boxing? That is how conservatives have traditionally defeated liberals.
Let them have their temper tantrums and destroy their city. It back and watch conservative areas become the new Silicon Valley. Power and money will move to the more conservative parts of the country.
I think ethnostates are easier. What works better I'm not sure (it's probably variable and arbitrary) but it's not the left.
If anyone is up to the challenge of maintaining any kind of diversity it's the right. They at least accept the challenges it brings. They acknowledge the problems.
The left doesn't and the left isn't up to the challenge.
What we're seeing under the left are increasingly intensifying battles of the sexes and race wars. Coexistence isn't working. It's catastrophically failing. Some people like to shoot the messenger but I'm just telling it as it is. One of the biggest failures you can make is failing to admit failure.
Diversity is too hard for the left but they don't believe in meritocracy or failure everyone gets a free pass.
Americans were not the first People to think of diversity. It was Christianity that first allowed you to join a group based on ideas rather than blood lines. America was modeled after this idea as a Christian nation.
Also, do you think it is a coincidence that America was the first country to do things differently and the first country to win 2 world wars, go to the moon, and concur the world?
Some people say diversity is our strength. True Americans know ideas are our strength. Leave behind this ethno-state nonsense. That idea was obsolete 2000 years ago.
The problem is that people are inherently tribal. Within Christianity there is a ton of self-segregation - there are black churches, Hispanic churches, Asian churches, and predominately white churches.
A small degree of mixing works, when the minority conforms to the culture of the majority. But large cultural factions are guaranteed to develop their own ideas for what is best within their group, rather than what is best for the nation as a whole.
This is the truth. When our focus is on a race issue, our focus isn’t on winning. I’ll take any Patriot who wants to keep America great, with he best candidate doing the job, best chance at success
Let the Left die by not hiring the best. They hire based on race and gender.
The "alternative right" began as a war for the media, and the GOP to classify the growing tea party movement. What was really happening was MAGA before MAGA was a thing. Conservatives were fed up with the uniparty, and wanted to reform the GOP into an actually conservative movement.
If we've all learned anything in the last three years, it should be easy to see that when certain elements started to "Take over" the alt right movement, and gave the media a scape goat to redefine the pre-maga movement as wacist, it was undoubtedly the feds who did it.
And as soon as that happened the movement split and evaporated, because nobody wanted to be called a wacist. Of course, the media kept talking about it, and made damn sure everyone knew they were talking about those wacists on the right, until they started branding any GOP member they didn't like as "alt right."
It was all as fake of a narrative as collusion.
But it gave them all the opportunity they needed to brand/word associate racism with Christianity.
Supremacist > Seperatist > Tea Party > Alt Right > Right > Republican > Conservative > Christian = Nazi
Evil is good, and good is evil. The narrative circle is now complete, and nothing we know of the last 20 years of politics was anything but a lie.
The alt-right were relatively insignificant until the media propped them up then lots of places snapped back against them to stop them operating in the open. It was a pathetic way for the media to call its opposition nazis by associating them with neo-nazis but without upfront calling them nazis. A more indirect attempt at what they did going on about the KKK as though they were the only Trump voters or even significant as a voter body while ignoring the entire population of the rest of the country.
If you obeyed the standard the media set out then only the KKK should be given the vote and whoever they don't vote for wins through a process of elimination.
The "alt-right" or the neo-nazis are a somewhat mad fringe group that seems to have a high concentration of social misfits or oddballs but generally speaking despite that is still more sound than the left.
Though it is true they got a bit more reach than they normally would via the internet it wasn't much and paled in comparison to the free advertising the media gave to the KKK and neo-nazis.
In part the success of the alt-right online was due to them also taking non-extreme, perfectly rational centralist points that are frequently censored and oppressed by the politically correct.
The alt-right is a bit mad but they're also canaries. If you ever examined people on the extremes there's often extreme sensitivity. Some people will lose it when you have even one immigrant per year. Very few but some will. Make it a thousand a year it'll be a few more. Make it a hundred thousand a year it'll be even more and it won't be a linear increase it'll jump up.
Normal people the red light goes on when something like that reaches the level of being a problem. For the alt-right you tend to have people with conditions such as being hyper threat adverse and their indicator turns on sooner.
What's very curious in this case is that you might expect this to be a normal distribution around the correct threshold but it's not. On the right it is but on the left the distribution is skewed so that it's increasingly normal for the problem indicator to be turned off entirely.
It's increasingly the case that this kind of extremism is not a pastime but their day job.
As far as the alt-right goes in seeing that the current progression is toward it being impossible to co-exist then they called it. Though between separatism like that and stopping "progressive" culture I'd opt for the latter.
Especially as what the hell are you going to do about the sexes? It's not so easy to keep those apart. You can have a weird scenario of importing and exporting sperm and babies between male/female states.
You need to check your reading comprehension. You're the one that's jumped to conclusions. You've been prejudice and that typifies everything we hate about the left.
You've introduced race where it doesn't matter while at the same time claiming I've introduced race.
Have you been watching events for context? The context is that you have under the left's multiculturalism black separatists running amok who are the other side of the same coin white separatists are on. You have race wars.
Coexistence is NOT WORKING under the left. We're seeing that play out right now.
The left want to architect a society that's a utopia which is one reason they're drawn the the promises of communism but look at what they achieve when they try to architect a multicultural society.
You've also made this a blame game. Separatism is practical. If you separate white people from black people then the white liberals can't exploit black people or just go nuts because some people are a different race like they do.
Do you separate the fox from the chicken or the chicken from the fox? Does it matter which is which? This is a matter of pragmatism not blame or punishment.
True diversity isn't cancer; the liberal defined everyone looks different but thinks the same diversity is absolute cancer because it's the 1984 version of "diversity",
Everyone in this thread is yapping about MLK's quote about the content of their character yada yada.
Every group has a bottom end. The bottom end of every group blames the other group for their issues.
If there is only one group then who can the bottom of that group blame?
But "conservatives" keep beating that diversity drum for the same reason liberals beat it. Because they were weak willed enough to accept the kool Aid and now they have to prove to everyone that their tongue is purple too.
If I've learned one thing from the last few weeks it is that diversity is cancer.
How about separating from the left? You know, judge people by the content of their character? I know I know, a truly racist idea, stolen straight from KKK-headperson MLK!
In my book, people of any skin color are welcome, as the problems reside on the inside (in their head), if any, and not on the outside.
Imagine if a group of black people found an island and wanted to start their own country, black people only.
Now imagine if a group of white people found an island, and wanted to make it white people only.
One would be called brave. The other would be called nazi, evil, and the entire world would be in uproar.
Well I agree and I also agree that if Hungary, Poland and whatever country, country, town or community wants to stay 98%+ white Christians that's all fine with me.
I just said about my personal view on this.
Freedom of association means the world to me! That includes the freedom to non-association 😉
Liberia. Also, they enslaved other blacks once they got there.
Be called brave/nazi by who? I thought by now everyone would understand the left acts hypocritically. The solution is not to become more like the left, it is to become less like the left.
In your example, we can say both groups are Nazis if they use violence against peaceful people bc of their race.
The alt-right=left-wing propaganda. Don’t fall for it my friend.
In this situation it's fairly obvious the left are the problem. It's an interesting paradox that it's the left demanding people mix together, making it so whether people want it or not, but then are also the cause for all the friction that makes people mixing together not feasible.
I do not believe this is accidental. You see the fruits of their labour in Yugoslavia, Libya and Syria. Greatly due to their input people in those countries could no longer live together and they're become fragmented into a series of separatist regions.
At this point I've so disgusted by the examples I see from the left and reached the point of realising it's often futile to try to reason with them that I think they actually deserve Hitler.
Hitler got the death camps right. It was the Jews that he got wrong. The the left are super paranoid about Hitler they see him everywhere and I don't think that's a coincidence. Jews themselves are often confused as to why so many non-Jews are so paranoid of Hitler and see him around every corner. The left are even more afraid of Hitler than the Jews. The Jews have a reason at least but what about the left? What could that be? Why don't the Jews exhibit this irrational fear of Hitler in any significant number despite history but the left does? The left fears Hitler because that's what they deserve. It's a manifestation of their inner psyche.
Why are they so mortally afraid of Nazis who were wiped out? Why are they so obsessed with a tiny minority of weird people who cosplay nazis and that are virtually pacifists?
Because the left deserves Nazis. They're terrified of them the same way a criminal is terrified of the police.
I cannot bring myself to sympathise with these people at all anymore. If we don't have the left, sure, even muslims aren't a threat but when we have the left we can't have nice things. We can't afford diversity or multiculturalism and the left as it is now at the same time.
You say "the left" and "jews" as though they are completely separate.
I believe over 90% of Jews identifies as liberal.
The left fear Nazis because they are Nazis. They are Nazis that don't know enough history to realize that they are replaying the rise of the brownshirts.
Look at the nascence of Nazism in Germany in the ´20s and ´30s. You see the same marches, the same aggression, the same demand for government to finance the people. For the Nazis the Jews were the scapegoat enemy. For today's Nazis it is the white middle class that is the enemy.
There is an important distinction, the Jews were not armed....
Bruh, you have it backwards. The radicals are home-grown Americans. Do they try to use diversity for propaganda? Sure, but only because that’s how you virtue-signal to other WHITE people.
we know this is ideological because the riots all occur in Democratic states and democratic cities. There is plenty of diversity in many GOP strongholds that did not turn violent.
You can afford diversity. You can’t afford Democrats. Luckily, you can move to a red state!
I don’t believe any human being deserves to be dehumanized. I also believe that torture is wrong(people who deserve torture will be tortured in hell. “Vengeance is the Lords”). But there are people(perhaps many people) who deserve death.
Being reasonable and passive with the modern authoratarian left allows them to stomp all over you without a struggle.
I agree this is why I said, make the test a brain-damage test (i.e. have to figure a way to uncover all lefties), not a skin-color test
Don’t lose your hope! Have you ever seen the rope-a-dope strategy in boxing? That is how conservatives have traditionally defeated liberals.
Let them have their temper tantrums and destroy their city. It back and watch conservative areas become the new Silicon Valley. Power and money will move to the more conservative parts of the country.
Yes^
I think ethnostates are easier. What works better I'm not sure (it's probably variable and arbitrary) but it's not the left.
If anyone is up to the challenge of maintaining any kind of diversity it's the right. They at least accept the challenges it brings. They acknowledge the problems.
The left doesn't and the left isn't up to the challenge.
What we're seeing under the left are increasingly intensifying battles of the sexes and race wars. Coexistence isn't working. It's catastrophically failing. Some people like to shoot the messenger but I'm just telling it as it is. One of the biggest failures you can make is failing to admit failure.
Diversity is too hard for the left but they don't believe in meritocracy or failure everyone gets a free pass.
Ethnostates work better: see japan, see china, see korea, see india, all good examples
LOL
Americans were not the first People to think of diversity. It was Christianity that first allowed you to join a group based on ideas rather than blood lines. America was modeled after this idea as a Christian nation.
Also, do you think it is a coincidence that America was the first country to do things differently and the first country to win 2 world wars, go to the moon, and concur the world?
Some people say diversity is our strength. True Americans know ideas are our strength. Leave behind this ethno-state nonsense. That idea was obsolete 2000 years ago.
The problem is that people are inherently tribal. Within Christianity there is a ton of self-segregation - there are black churches, Hispanic churches, Asian churches, and predominately white churches.
A small degree of mixing works, when the minority conforms to the culture of the majority. But large cultural factions are guaranteed to develop their own ideas for what is best within their group, rather than what is best for the nation as a whole.
This is the truth. When our focus is on a race issue, our focus isn’t on winning. I’ll take any Patriot who wants to keep America great, with he best candidate doing the job, best chance at success
Let the Left die by not hiring the best. They hire based on race and gender.
Please no, not the “nation of immigrants” meme.
The "alternative right" began as a war for the media, and the GOP to classify the growing tea party movement. What was really happening was MAGA before MAGA was a thing. Conservatives were fed up with the uniparty, and wanted to reform the GOP into an actually conservative movement.
If we've all learned anything in the last three years, it should be easy to see that when certain elements started to "Take over" the alt right movement, and gave the media a scape goat to redefine the pre-maga movement as wacist, it was undoubtedly the feds who did it.
And as soon as that happened the movement split and evaporated, because nobody wanted to be called a wacist. Of course, the media kept talking about it, and made damn sure everyone knew they were talking about those wacists on the right, until they started branding any GOP member they didn't like as "alt right."
It was all as fake of a narrative as collusion.
But it gave them all the opportunity they needed to brand/word associate racism with Christianity.
Supremacist > Seperatist > Tea Party > Alt Right > Right > Republican > Conservative > Christian = Nazi
Evil is good, and good is evil. The narrative circle is now complete, and nothing we know of the last 20 years of politics was anything but a lie.
The alt-right were relatively insignificant until the media propped them up then lots of places snapped back against them to stop them operating in the open. It was a pathetic way for the media to call its opposition nazis by associating them with neo-nazis but without upfront calling them nazis. A more indirect attempt at what they did going on about the KKK as though they were the only Trump voters or even significant as a voter body while ignoring the entire population of the rest of the country.
If you obeyed the standard the media set out then only the KKK should be given the vote and whoever they don't vote for wins through a process of elimination.
The "alt-right" or the neo-nazis are a somewhat mad fringe group that seems to have a high concentration of social misfits or oddballs but generally speaking despite that is still more sound than the left.
Though it is true they got a bit more reach than they normally would via the internet it wasn't much and paled in comparison to the free advertising the media gave to the KKK and neo-nazis.
In part the success of the alt-right online was due to them also taking non-extreme, perfectly rational centralist points that are frequently censored and oppressed by the politically correct.
The alt-right is a bit mad but they're also canaries. If you ever examined people on the extremes there's often extreme sensitivity. Some people will lose it when you have even one immigrant per year. Very few but some will. Make it a thousand a year it'll be a few more. Make it a hundred thousand a year it'll be even more and it won't be a linear increase it'll jump up.
Normal people the red light goes on when something like that reaches the level of being a problem. For the alt-right you tend to have people with conditions such as being hyper threat adverse and their indicator turns on sooner.
What's very curious in this case is that you might expect this to be a normal distribution around the correct threshold but it's not. On the right it is but on the left the distribution is skewed so that it's increasingly normal for the problem indicator to be turned off entirely.
It's increasingly the case that this kind of extremism is not a pastime but their day job.
As far as the alt-right goes in seeing that the current progression is toward it being impossible to co-exist then they called it. Though between separatism like that and stopping "progressive" culture I'd opt for the latter.
Especially as what the hell are you going to do about the sexes? It's not so easy to keep those apart. You can have a weird scenario of importing and exporting sperm and babies between male/female states.
You need to check your reading comprehension. You're the one that's jumped to conclusions. You've been prejudice and that typifies everything we hate about the left.
You've introduced race where it doesn't matter while at the same time claiming I've introduced race.
Have you been watching events for context? The context is that you have under the left's multiculturalism black separatists running amok who are the other side of the same coin white separatists are on. You have race wars.
Coexistence is NOT WORKING under the left. We're seeing that play out right now.
The left want to architect a society that's a utopia which is one reason they're drawn the the promises of communism but look at what they achieve when they try to architect a multicultural society.
You've also made this a blame game. Separatism is practical. If you separate white people from black people then the white liberals can't exploit black people or just go nuts because some people are a different race like they do.
Do you separate the fox from the chicken or the chicken from the fox? Does it matter which is which? This is a matter of pragmatism not blame or punishment.
It’s going to be disastrous if minorities start to take over the government.
Diversity is chaos
True diversity isn't cancer; the liberal defined everyone looks different but thinks the same diversity is absolute cancer because it's the 1984 version of "diversity",
Exactly right. Without diversity, life would be boring. Without diversity, everybody would be the same.
Diversity doesn't have anything to do with skin color. Diversity is the differences in our life experiences that defines each person.
Only if you use the redefinition that liberals created where Diversity means black people.
But diversity just means we all have differences and has nothing to do with our skin color.
Everyone in this thread is yapping about MLK's quote about the content of their character yada yada.
Every group has a bottom end. The bottom end of every group blames the other group for their issues.
If there is only one group then who can the bottom of that group blame?
But "conservatives" keep beating that diversity drum for the same reason liberals beat it. Because they were weak willed enough to accept the kool Aid and now they have to prove to everyone that their tongue is purple too.