Why are you linking to Twitter, which links to a New York Times article, when you should be giving this link for the survey they reference.
Outside of the total amount of participants, there are no actual numbers given in these results. They're all percentages within certain categories, and not a single number showing the makeup of that group. However, refining the results yields the political makeup: 32% Independent, 37% Democrat, and... 31% Republican.
They can weight that all they want, but even those results show Republicans trending up on being neither for or against, meaning less toward either full opposition or support.
I wouldn't trust it farther than I can throw it. Quit your sleepwalking.
Why are you linking to Twitter, which links to a New York Times article, when you should be giving this link for the survey they reference.
Outside of the total amount of participants, there are no actual numbers given in these results. They're all percentages within certain categories, and not a single number showing the makeup of that group. However, refining the results yields the political makeup: 32% Independent, 37% Democrat, and... 31% Republican.
They can weight that all they want, but even those results show Republicans trending up on being neither for or against, meaning less toward either full opposition or support.
I wouldn't trust it farther than I can throw it. Quit your sleepwalking.
If it was a puffed up poll why would it be in the negative through 2018