73
Comments (10)
sorted by:
4
progressives4Trump 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well, she's right, but this bitch is an opportunist who is anti-Trump half the time.

3
Count_Dyscalculia 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ammo is Ammo. Use it.

2
independentbystander [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Exactly, thank you <3 <3 <3

She is 100% correct in this article, regardless of her recent single-issue-focused flip-floppery. We would ignore the information in this article to our peril!

2
independentbystander [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Correct. As discerning logically-minded people, we should sort out the good/bad information any of these pundits put out there.

I have read most of her books, all packed with solid well-researched and well-sourced info on illegal immigration and the Leftist Agenda. I have not read "In Trump We Trust," although I should, considering how quickly she changed her positions (maybe she was being sarcastic with the title.)

Obviously, she has become a disgusting opportunist flip-flopper in recent years, having become triggered and screechy in her tantrums over progress on The Wall and proper immigration reform. I share her feelings, I am just as outraged and then some. However, to focus on the Campaign Promises that are yet to be fulfilled (as Coulter has done) while ignoring the unprecedented number of Campaign Promises Our President has delivered on (and the many positive surprises we weren't expecting) would be counter-productive.

Example: The Trump Campaign website had a logical plan to Build The Wall, and Make Mexico Pay For it. I have written at length on this previously, both here, at The_Donald, and Ask The_Donald (the forum where we invited Leftists/Democrats to debate, in hopes of dispelling their propaganda narratives.) The quick version: the plan was to use existing US Law to cut off/properly tax the then-record-high $26 Billion (with a B) dollars in outgoing "remittance" money sent out of the country (mostly by illegal aliens) to their families/cartels in Mexico, which functions as "de facto welfare" for Mexican citizens whose government does not bother to provide for them. (And why should they, with all that tax-free money coming in.) On Day 2, the Mexican government would gladly pay the one-time $9-to-11 Billion dollar budget for The Wall (which was the estimate at the time, that didn't include Government Project Bloat) in order to restore the ill-gotten gains of "remittance" money for their citizens, who would have been rioting since Day 1. (At the time, Mexico was #6 in outgoing remittance money. Maybe the other countries reaping these benefits would also have been similarly affected leading to world-wide rioting and chaos, who knows, there was no explanation for the sudden abandonment of the plan. I guess it was better to let them continue to ramp up their rioting here.)

The wall-funding plan disappeared from the Trump Campaign website without explanation, 2 or 3 months before The 2016 Election. Of course this led to the DNC holding funding for The Wall hostage in congress to get further pandering and benefits for DACA and other illegal-alien-friendly DNC Replacement Voter strategies. Currently, "remittance" money to Mexico is still breaking records yearly, going over $30 Billion the last report I saw.

I promise you, I am much more outraged over this than Ann Coulter is, but I'm not a wealthy pretty blonde lady so the chances of The Masses listening to me is less than zero: I do not wield Karen Privilege. But it would be irresponsible and un-helpful to run amok screeching, throwing the anchor-baby out with the bathwater, as it were. President Trump has done much more right than not-right, and in the interest of unity (and re-Election) my efforts are much better spent in support of Our President.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
independentbystander [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Correct. But please read the article, the information within is very informative and important.

3
golfbrora 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fuck Ann Coulter. She is as irrelevant as Bill Kristol and Jonah Goldberg.

2
independentbystander [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not when she's dropping Red Pills like this article. Few people who receive her level of attention dare to speak this level of truth about the negative effects of illegal immigration, anchor babies/birthright citizenship, and the "progress" of the Leftist Agenda.

Just because she's a butthurt flip-flopper doesn't negate the truth behind her books "¡Adios, America!" and "Godless: The Church Of Liberalism."

2
golfbrora 2 points ago +2 / -0

Honestly, I was so pissed at her, I didn't read the article. I will now.

1
independentbystander [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Exactly! I'm not un-pissed at her, I'm actually very disappointed in her for so quickly turning on Our President for no reason other than her own impatience.

I'm also extremely disappointed that she kept up the false "no wall is being built" Leftist narrative, in spite of the progress that has been made on The Wall, and still continues. The Wall is not as big and beautiful as her expectations, that's OK because it doesn't meet my expectations either.

But: I am grateful to Our President for getting any progress on The Wall at all, because I am able to take into account the ridiculous self-serving obstructionist DNC's desperate attention-mongering opposition to anything related to America First, especially The Wall: because that would impede the flow of illegal alien Replacement Voters/Supplemental Rioters.

However: as an obsessed single-issue voter, Coulter's statements on the negative effects of illegal immigrants on our country are still as solid as ever, and her concerns quite valid. I can't toss that out just because she is flailing for attention in a ridiculous tantrum otherwise. Maybe if Our President had made her Head of Border Patrol or Homeland Security Director on the first day (as he should have,) we wouldn't be dealing with any of these problems. (That's not near as ridiculous as it sounds, the DNC wants Stacey Abrams as Biden's running-mate.)