3321
Comments (535)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
14
Runitzgodzilla 14 points ago +15 / -1

I feel like were gonna get a 2-1 vote to let this shitshow go on. Mark it.

8
deleted 8 points ago +9 / -1
6
Omgwtfbbq 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yup, they drew a favorable judges.

5
shragae 5 points ago +5 / -0

I don't think so: Trump appointee, Bush appointee, Clinton appointee...

2
chuckachookah 2 points ago +3 / -1

But Henderson (Bush appointee) is old and just wants to kick the issue back down.

She asked no less than 4 times about letting Judge Sullivan have his July 16th hearing, which will only be drawn out again. BOTH the defense and the prosecution asked that not happen for reason in their own parties interest, but she's seemed pretty weak.

So, IN THE MEANTIME, Judge Sullivan, his lawyer (a deep-state Obama hack), and his illegitimately appointed amici (another Trump-hating, Obama ass-kissing former judge) are going to deluge with leaks of false narrative (they already have the submission).

This decision SHOULD BE 3-0 and the writ granted if they followed the law. They won't.

3
IncredibleMrE1 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yep, I said this earlier on in the thread. Rao will be the dissent.

2
saveMySpeech 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, that's what I am thinking too. This is a clown show....