3036
Comments (150)
sorted by:
177
nachosamplerREBORN 177 points ago +177 / -0

Since post modernism where there are no rules other than you’re wrong.

62
SomeGuyOnTheInternet 62 points ago +62 / -0

That's racist.

35
Username 35 points ago +35 / -0

Yes, it is. I saw it.

34
VTmaga 34 points ago +34 / -0

Stop being sightist. Think about those with vision impairments when you speak.

16
Thegman 16 points ago +16 / -0

Did you just assume they had the ability to speak, shitlord?

15
deleted 15 points ago +15 / -0
13
agile_a 13 points ago +13 / -0

it's all part of the Democrats plan to create a self-fulfilling prophecy of police shootings. If you tell him convinced all the black people that the police are hunting them down and out to kill them then black people will be more likely to run away and fight back against the police out of fear for their own safety and as a result police will be more likely to use force on the black people and it casian Ali shoot them..

the Democrats create a self-fulfilling prophecy that way. you could break the cycle completely if black people were just a little more respectful to police and followed directions and there would be no issues..

if you think George Floyd was peacefully getting into the car and somehow out of nowhere the police decided to go from literally having him halfway into the seat just throwing him on the ground and kneeling on his neck for no reason then you've bought into the propaganda. If you watch the video they released it cuts out right at the point where they are literally putting him into the car. there is no conceivable way that it could go from that point to having him on the ground with an officer on him unless he started resisting..

it doesn't make sense. It might make sense to an idiot liberal who thinks the police are literally hunting black people and just decided to put him into the car just to pull him right back out throw him on the ground and him for no reason.. but obviously that wasn't what happened

while I agree that police shouldn't be using more Force than is necessary at the same time entire altercations could be avoided if black people just acted more respectfully. but when they're told that the police are literally hunting them down in the streets then they are more likely to run away and fight back..

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
17
Forgototherpassword 17 points ago +17 / -0

No, it's racist to disagree with him as he is saying the current (D) narrative.

There is no wrong, only racist, which is the worst thing.

Therefore he is right, you are racist.

4
publ1us 4 points ago +4 / -0

"Nothing exists except an endless present where the party (D) is always right"

2
Whoopies_tds 2 points ago +2 / -0

Stealing a cops taser and firing at him is “sleeping in your car” bigot

87
bluedevilga 87 points ago +88 / -1

Here's a test, take a remote control and point it at a cop and act like you're going to shoot him with it. He will drop you. He doesn't know if the guy has another weapon cuz they weren't able to thoroughly search him, and they're training says if somebody takes a weapon and pointed at them but that person needs to push some daffodils.

33
scoggydoogan 33 points ago +33 / -0

It's almost like he wanted suicide by cop

4
squanchingonpao 4 points ago +4 / -0

Na he was so fat and out of shape he wasn't going to be jogging for much longer he had to put the cop down

30
Keiichi81 30 points ago +30 / -0

Doesn't matter. Even if the cops absolutely were both aware that it was their taser he was pointing at them, a taser can still be fatal particularly if the one being tased is standing up on asphalt (can fall and strike your head hard enough to do serious damage), and incapacitating a cop means he then has access to that cop's firearm.

23
Mrsattorney 23 points ago +23 / -0

The taser can disable the cop, and that enables the perp to grab his firearm. I would also add that a police officer is not required to use an equal force in response.

26
LowbloodHighEnergyRI 26 points ago +26 / -0

I watched the entire dash video. How in the holy hell can anyone watch that, see that he resisted a lawful arrest, landed multiple haymakers on a cop, stole a police taser, ran away and turned to use the weapon on the cop, and still Reeeeeeee!!!

They burned a Wendy's down for that? WTF, black leaders need to call this for what it is and try to stop further rioting.

8
deleted 8 points ago +9 / -1
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Jbsmoover 1 point ago +1 / -0

Exactly. YouTube viewers watching this video who are likely to leave a comment? Not half the country regardless of the comment ratios.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
11
AmericanJawa 11 points ago +11 / -0

This is why it's illegal to paint real guns to look like toy guns, and why toy guns have to be immediately distinguishable from real guns.

2
HeavyVetting 2 points ago +2 / -0

Come on, everyone knows this only applies if you're black. /s

74
deleted 74 points ago +74 / -0
27
RocketSurgeon22 27 points ago +28 / -1

The dude was drinking and driving. If the cops let him flee, he would have car jacked someone. Then we would have a high speed chase were innocent people would have died.

I would like to hear from the Mayor - what she feels should have been done. Prisoner released with no telling what kind of activity he was involved in - what does she expect the police to do?

12
Mrsattorney 12 points ago +12 / -0

Cops are not your friend when you break the law, engage in a rough physical fight with them, and try to turn their own taser on them.

4
deleted 4 points ago +10 / -6
6
Magastein143 6 points ago +6 / -0

Exactly. When you are dealing with unpredictable violent criminals, you need to react immediately - you can't stop and analyze racism and what ifs and what is the best case scenario and lets talk about our feelings. If cops did that, they would die. And that story would NOT be in the news.

1
Thingthing22 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is what they want. Cops afraid so there are no cops other than crazy lunatics that follow politics before law.

64
_____ 64 points ago +64 / -0

You are holding a gun, shooting at police, and you are shot 6 times.

After the 5th bullet hits you the gun falls out of your hand. Then the 6th bullet hits you.

CNN: Unarmed black man shot by white police officer.

10
independentbystander 10 points ago +10 / -0

Is that the Keith Scott incident? That's an oldie but goodie!

>Perp was seen "rolling a blunt" by police. Upon realizing he was being watched, Perp waved a handgun at the officers (who retreated a safe distance to don protective gear.) Perp was re-found in his car at a nearby apartment complex, where he got out and initiated stand-off with police, refused to drop his weapon, was neutralized lawfully in self-defense by police.

>The Perp's Wife was screeching "HE AINT GOT NO GUN" during the incident, forgetting she had recently filed a domestic-violence report on her husband, stating Scott was known to carry a small semi-automatic handgun (similar to the one Scott was pointing at police at the time, which coincidentally fit the ankle-holster he was wearing.)

>MSM "reports" this as: Innocent black man shot by police while reading a book, waiting to pick up his daughter after school. (No book was found at the scene.)

>Riots ensue

4
Gwoz8881 4 points ago +4 / -0

It’s still a white police officer even if the officer isn’t white

63
Reddit_refuge3 63 points ago +63 / -0

Did a quick Google search to read how biased the headlines are, my favorite was "he was going to celebrate his daughters birthday the next day" ooooh okay that explains being drunk and falling asleep in a drive thru, resisting arrest and stealing the taser while pointing it at cops.

51
RocketSurgeon22 51 points ago +51 / -0

Or that he was in prison for 7 years for beating his kids.

15
Bucktooth34 15 points ago +15 / -0

Woah!

Kind of a big thing to leave out, MSM.

8
Mrsattorney 8 points ago +8 / -0

Seriously?

6
RocketSurgeon22 6 points ago +7 / -1

Yeah and he was on his way to his 2nd DUI, assaulted police, resisted arrest and had he gotten away - he would have known he was a wanted man with more jail time - he would have been a threat to the public. This cop thought swiftly and reacted to his situation. He may have saved lives of many.

1
Mrsattorney 1 point ago +1 / -0

Was he currently on parole? And do you know any of the circumstances surrounding the prior arrest for beating the kids?

5
RocketSurgeon22 5 points ago +5 / -0

He did 7 years for beating his kids. We all know CPS is pretty bad so it probably was a serious beating with years of abuse. Child beaters get tossed around in prison, he wasn't gonna go back. He was on parole and was in process of his 2nd DUI. That's why he decided to resist arrest and attack them.

4
patriotto 4 points ago +4 / -0

is rayray related to ray rice?

4
NewVoatAccountName 4 points ago +4 / -0

Sounds like the cops saved his daughter from a "Birthday Beating".

17
patriotto 17 points ago +17 / -0

"resisting arrest" is a bullshit copout...he was fighting and punching the cops, throwing them around https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCdo1YA2x60

6
Genericwhitemale 6 points ago +6 / -0

LOL

4
Nicktdot 4 points ago +4 / -0

YOU BIGOT! he wanted to be first inline for the morning's Happy Meals

1
cuckslasher 1 point ago +1 / -0

one could say he was a good boy

45
deleted 45 points ago +46 / -1
15
Bucktooth34 15 points ago +15 / -0

What do people expect the cop to do? Give the guy who stole his taser a BJ?

38
deleted 38 points ago +38 / -0
22
patriotto 22 points ago +22 / -0

they are not allowed to do anything they want (see Candace Owens, Thomas Sowell, etc)....they are allowed and encouraged to do the worst shit to destroy what others built, including their lives, livelihoods, and families

13
Genericwhitemale 13 points ago +13 / -0

The media is encouraging animal-like behavior, basically

7
patriotto 7 points ago +7 / -0

media? what are you talking about? it's EVERYONE AROUND US

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
35
MrWinMan 35 points ago +35 / -0

An officer shot a guy twice last night in my hometown. The guy got in his car and hit an officer, then another officer opened fire. The police chief didn't mention that in his statement last night, instead he just stated that the guy was unarmed. I just learned about the car thing this morning. What the fuck! (Democrat Police Chief ofc)

3
Cyer6 3 points ago +3 / -0

Using a 3000 lb machine that can power itself up to high speeds can be a lethal weapon. Our federal government created a new branch of government called Homeland Security and along with it, the TSA because "some people" decided to use airliners as missiles in 2001. Some of these police chiefs we're seeing over the past few months are the absolute filth of society.

23
deleted 23 points ago +23 / -0
19
deleted 19 points ago +19 / -0
18
JwPATX 18 points ago +21 / -3

I can tell you what their argument will be. Whether it’s bullshit or not is up for debate, but: after he fires the taser, he’s technically unarmed b/c they don’t shoot twice w/o reloading.

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
10
supermagafragilistic 10 points ago +10 / -0

They are reloadable though, like all guns. If I was running from the police and turned and fired a flare gun at them i wouldn't expect them to just be like "Frank, if he starts reloading shoot him", they would probably just shoot me.

9
Keiichi81 9 points ago +9 / -0

"I emptied my entire magazine at the officers and then they shot me, but because I was out of bullets, I was unarmed."

7
MakeAmericaLegendary 7 points ago +7 / -0

Funny, guns also don't shoot more than a round without reloading.

5
WilburPudding 5 points ago +8 / -3

Sounds like a sound argument to me IMO

7
RocketSurgeon22 7 points ago +7 / -0

They never completed searching him though.

2
deleted 2 points ago +4 / -2
3
LowbloodHighEnergyRI 3 points ago +3 / -0

If police cannot use their guns when someone fires a taser at them, why do we give them guns in the first place? This is getting so fucking ridiculous.

16
SomeGuyOnTheInternet 16 points ago +16 / -0

If an unarmed guy with a knife charges you, just shoot him in the leg.

24
deleted 24 points ago +24 / -0
7
RocketSurgeon22 7 points ago +7 / -0

You pull out your batman gun and shoot a net. This will stop the unarmed man with a letter opener from opening mail that doesn't belong to him.

7
Only_Rosie_ODonnell 7 points ago +7 / -0

You bring cheesecake, you racis

5
Bucktooth34 5 points ago +5 / -0

You... you know... the thing...

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
12
Tonightm01 12 points ago +12 / -0

It's not wrong.

The thing with the other criminal scum they were able to suppress why he was in the process of being arrested for a long time.

Now everyone is focused on it, its harder for them to lie. Though they will still lie.

He was blocking access. He resisted arrest. Grab the police officers taser. Further resisting arrest. Pointed it at the police officer and that was that.

There was no reason for him to take the actions he did. He presented himself as a threat and the police did what they had to do.

2
LowbloodHighEnergyRI 2 points ago +2 / -0

He landed a couple of haymakers to the cops face. If I did that, I would be(rightly) arrested for assault on a police officer. It sure seems like black people can do whatever they want right now and fuck whitey.

12
ignorant_slob 12 points ago +12 / -0

There was a case in Pennsylvania where a car doing drivebys was pulled over and the occupants scattered. A lone cop was outnumbered and the occupants had home field advantage. Cop shoots one of the occupants during pursuit and a firearm is found in the vehicle but not on the dead thug. Outrage ensues and the police force is disbanded.

https://bearingarms.com/tom-k/2019/08/03/east-pittsburgh-citizens-starting-regret-disbanding-police-department/

4
Ballind 4 points ago +4 / -0

Should've shot them all

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
3
ippwndu 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not entirely true. They are, however, always one-armed, because the other is busy holding up their pants.

10
f_bastiat 10 points ago +10 / -0

Clown world: He wasn't using his own weapon, he was using the officers weapon, therefor the officer should be charged with firing the taser at himself.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
8
redditadminssuckit 8 points ago +8 / -0

DINDU

4
10gauge [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

Nuffin

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
6
Spinnumb 6 points ago +6 / -0

He was completely justified. The guy was resisting arrest and trying to incapacitate the officer. Play stupid games win stupid prizes.

6
NdNcenti 6 points ago +6 / -0

Evil is good and good is evil

5
Ophelia 5 points ago +5 / -0

They’re confusing a taser with a stun gun I believe

7
Only_Rosie_ODonnell 7 points ago +7 / -0

Huh? Try using either on a cop and see what happens

5
Omgwtfbbq 5 points ago +5 / -0

If they have a problem with it, maybe they should take it up with how they are trained. I’m seeing a lot of retards on twitter and YouTube asking why the cops didn’t shoot him in the leg. Do they know how dangerous that is in a crowded parking lot?

5
just-a-pleb 5 points ago +5 / -0

I used to be part of that crowd, the "just shoot him in the leg" retards until I learned more about guns and started to understand just how hard it is to actually aim a handgun even with perfect conditions.

4
tufftoffee 4 points ago +4 / -0

Exactly. People who say ridiculous shit like "shoot them in the leg" have never touched a firearm. Hell, try shooting a compact firearm straight.

1
Cyer6 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is why many departments create and value Citizen's Academies. All types of folks attend these academies including those who are fascinated with the profession and are deciding whether they should make it a career, college students doing research, average citizens who just want to know how their department functions and handles business in their communities, and anti-police activists.

These departments take people out on ride-alongs and put them through sophisticated force simulators. Those simulators open the eyes of nearly 100% of the people who go through them. Once they realize how fast death can come for them and the short amount of time they have to react and place an accurate shot on a moving target, reality suddenly hits them.

4
Taupkek 4 points ago +4 / -0

CNN sez he just POINTED the taser, and that settles it for me! Never mind that yer lying eyes can CLEARLY see the flash and the wires streaming backwards as he pulled the trigger. Git yer fax strait, ya raycuss deeplorable!!

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
AngelMark 4 points ago +4 / -0

When Obama reared his ugly satanic head!

4
Bendemova 4 points ago +4 / -0

When retards started believing non lethal meant not deadly.

Definition: Non-lethal weapons, also called less-lethal weapons, less-than-lethal weapons, non-deadly weapons, compliance weapons, or pain-inducing weapons are weapons intended to be less likely to kill a living target than conventional weapons such as knives and firearms.

The same retards rioting over non lethal techniques such as subduing pos barbarians (George Floyd) by using "non lethal" body weight.

The same retards that bitch and whine about cops using other non lethal weapons such as tear gas, pepper spray, pepperballs, tasers, bean bags, water cannons etc.

Retard:

Cops are trying to kill us by using tasers on muh peaceful protesters.

Also retard:

so what if brooks stole a cop taser and fired at cops, tasers are harmless!

4
patriotto 4 points ago +4 / -0

if rayray was driving drunk, then he was armed and dangerous

3
Keiichi81 3 points ago +3 / -0

Watched a report on it about 30 minutes ago where some armchair lawyer with a cellphone who recorded the shooting still insisted that the guy had been unarmed when they shot him. Listening to that mouth-breather go off at the cops for "shooting an unarmed guy like that" and telling them their "careers are over" was fucking infuriating.

3
oEMPYREo 3 points ago +3 / -0

Don’t forget he was peaceful and cooperative. I literally read that on a headline for TMZ on the bodycam that shows him drunk and then grab their weapon and run.

3
dakkath 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
SAW2TH 3 points ago +3 / -0

Forget about trying to use facts or evidence to combat these people - it is folly.

The only thing these people will understand is overwhelming force because their goal is not to improve America - their goal is to erase America and usher in some Bolshevik ideal that is contrary to everything America stands for.

Make no mistake. This is the fight for the life of America and we need to support Trump and the police to use whatever force is necessary to quell this foreign fueled uprising.

Consider this: if America was invaded by a Russian/Chinese/Iranian army, would you support our military to fight these invaders back? Or would you listen to the leftist media that tries to tell you that the invading army is a “peacekeeping force” and castrate our military in favor of political correctness? In essence what is happening right now is a foggy reflection of that invading army - except the Russians/Chinese/Iranians have (through decades of subversion) brainwashed our youth through the universities to act as their foot soldiers for them. A dark time is upon us but we need to stomp this out now before it gets further along the road to full Bolshevik revolution.

1
Jbsmoover 1 point ago +1 / -0

Absolutely this.

3
Thedaythe_redditdied 3 points ago +3 / -0

Do you know what police involved shootings i have a problem with? When the police shoot a ‘non violent man’. Then we have a problem. In armed means nothin to me anymore.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
LirukDatan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ever since protests where 27 cops get hurt are being called "mostly peaceful".

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
doodaddy 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s the definition of suicide by cop

2
Ironlabel 2 points ago +2 / -0

When it’s a black man. Because black privilege exists. You don’t have to follow the law when your black now.

2
scheat91 2 points ago +2 / -0

When Black Lives Matter was created by Soros

2
MAGA_Master 2 points ago +2 / -0

At some point the police force will stop arresting black Americans. If the black community doesn’t want their help and will charge them with murder and separate them from their family, then let them defend it themselves.

2
swimminginthoughts 2 points ago +2 / -0

It was opposite day!

2
ModsBanPaleos 2 points ago +2 / -0

Since George floyd blacks are allowed to do whatever they want for the next two years

2
iouybiy 2 points ago +2 / -0

July 2nd 1964

2
Ursus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Answer: When mainstream media decided to incite hatred and violent riots.

2
PewPew_ThaDuK 2 points ago +2 / -0

According to wapo yes actually...

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Patriot4ever2020plus 1 point ago +2 / -1

During the oliar administration. The most corrupt group of people in history. Oliar the king(queen?) of race baiting. As president he knew, or should have known, all of the facts in the cases where he inflamed the black community. However, he chose to craft a racist narrative each time. Stop buying tickets to sportsball. Let the pampered millionaire racists know that we are DONE. TRUMP/PENCE2020 KAG2020

1
Crisgocentipede 1 point ago +1 / -0

There is just never any thought that crossing the mind that officers are on the front line in danger and doing what they can to keep others out of danger

1
Anyslogan2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Who are you going to believe? The media? Or your lying eyes?! Lol.

1
TaggartCiscontinenta 1 point ago +1 / -0

09/22/1862

1
schnazzmizzle 1 point ago +1 / -0

Martyr Complex:

They might always have a story about their latest woe or a sacrifice they’ve made for someone else. They might even exaggerate bad things that happen to get sympathy or make others feel guilty.

https://www.healthline.com/health/martyr-complex#martyr-vs-victim