I agree, the use of force was justified. But Tim doesn't understand the concept of totality of circumstances. He thinks the subject shouldn't have been shot after the fact. Clearly, according to the use of force model the officer was objectively reasonable in using deadly force since the subject disarmed the officer of his taser in a struggle to gain compliance, which could have been used to disable or kill him and relieve him of his side arm.
I agree, the use of force was justified. But Tim doesn't understand the concept of totality of circumstances. He thinks the subject shouldn't have been shot after the fact. Clearly, according to the use of force model the officer was objectively reasonable in using deadly force since the subject disarmed the officer of his taser in a struggle to gain compliance, which could have been used to disable or kill him and relieve him of his side arm.
Here is the Model used by my agency under the DOD: https://i.ytimg.com/vi/eXWTIpovCHA/maxresdefault.jpg
The subject escalated from Compliant ---->Active Resistance----> Serious Bodily Harm/Death (once he managed to disarm the officer of his taser.)