Over the past 2 months I've seen a lot of posts making claims without providing a source link. Many of us come to TD for our news, and have way to much trust in each other with no sources. Here is a prime example from today.
https://thedonald.win/p/FzBFY8zE/guess-who-was-a-child-abusing-dr/c/
Here at TD we should set the bar high when it comes to news. Failing to provide any source makes us look just as bad as CNN, MSN, MSNBC etc.
Let's all work on being better at providing source link for an image immediately or just make it a link post. Use image posts for memes, shitposts.
Happy Sunday Gunday, Happy Flag Day, and Happy Birthday Donald Trump!
No he didn't. He contradicted every answer he gave. Then got a 108 on his breath analyzer test which is clearly DUI. I don't think you have actually bothered watching the body cam footage because if you did, you won't be saying stuff like that. Dude was literally contradicting him again and again, he was that drunk.
Deadly Force Triangle assessment:
OPPORTUNITY - Did he have the opportunity to cause serious harm or death once he had the taser?
Yes, he was within distance, had a taser capable of incapacitating the officer and potentially killing him once the officer was down.
ABILITY - Did he actually have the means to cause a serious injury/death situation?
Yes, similarly, he had a weapon plenty capable of causing harm itself and/or creating a situation, if successfully deployed, that could’ve resulted in death.
JEOPARDY - Was there a real threat or was the individual acting in a threatening manner indicating his intentions were to cause harm/death?
Yes, he fought officers, wrestled away a weapon capable of disabling someone and was resisting a lawful arrest and attempting to use the weapon.
VERDICT - Justified shooting
APPEAL:
Can we remove one of these factors so it would not have been justified?
OPPORTUNITY - If he was 100 feet away, he would not have had the opportunity. He was close and even if he ran a short distance, could’ve easily turned and used the weapon.
ABILITY - If he did not succeed in taking the taser, but was still near the officers, he would not have had the ability. He, in fact, did have the taser.
JEOPARDY - If he complied with a lawful arrest, or was not aggressive in his actions, there’d be no jeopardy. He resisted a completely legitimate arrest, fought officers, stole a weapon and attempted to use it.
RULING - Stands, justified shooting
Yeah I meant the physical tests. I wasn’t sure what the 108 stood for. I’ve never seen blood alcohol content measured that way.
Still, when dealing with drunks you gotta understand that decision-making skills aren’t the best. Couldn’t they have tried to defuse the situation a bit and lead him up to “we’re gonna arrest you”? It seemed so abrupt
It's 0.108g. The limit is 0.08 is the legal limit for adults over twenty-one years of age driving non-commercial vehicles:
http://www.georgecreal.com/what-does-a-given-blood-alcohol-level-mean.html
You clearly have NOT watched the body cam video and therefore I won't even bother replying as I have stated several times that you are talking out of your ass without watching the video.
I have posted this before to which you replied and I will post this again:
Here's both the body cam videos:
1st: https://youtu.be/zVkXqgGkEL8
2nd: https://youtu.be/h30MJIdRMeg
Just watch the first 40 minutes of first video. Cops were patient, professional and literally talked calmly to him for 40 fucking minutes. Don't bother replying if you can't be bothered to watch the video. This is shit I expect from leftists over at Reddit and CNN, not on TD.
I watched the entire first video (before the camera fell off). It's a difficult situation all around.