I've said this elsewhere, but I agree with both Kavanaugh and Gorsuch and I don't think this is a bad ruling... in fact I think it might be the most red pilled ruling we've seen in a long time. Wait for the big reveal or read the bottom of my post to see what the red pill actually is.
I 100% agree with you/Kavanaugh that this should have been the job of Congress to add protected classes explicitly by law. It would have been very easy for them to do... especially in '09-'10 when Obama had a supermajority, but alas Democrats really don't give a shit about trans rights. They knew that once they give trans people their rights then there's no reason for trans people to support Democrats anymore lol.
That said, I also agree with Gorsuch's ruling... which is a secret red pill.
Gorsuch's opinion basically has a couple examples. Let's say person X is attracted to men. If you're ok with X being female but not male then this is sex discrimination.
Now let's pretend that person X dresses up and identifies as a woman. If person X is female and you're ok with that but not if X is male then that is also sex discrimination.
But guess what this also means? It means that this entire case is based on the premise that SEX is a protected class. It relies on recognizing that males and females are biological characteristics ingrained in our DNA. And at least until a male cuts up his penis into a vagina and vice versa then it also means that males = penises and females = vaginas.
We have ALL seen leftists getting enraged for calling trans women males even though yes they are biologically male. They can no longer get upset about this imo (they will anyway but they don't really have any right to anymore). Their sex status is literally what is protecting them now because there is no protected gender class.
I've said this elsewhere, but I agree with both Kavanaugh and Gorsuch and I don't think this is a bad ruling... in fact I think it might be the most red pilled ruling we've seen in a long time. Wait for the big reveal or read the bottom of my post to see what the red pill actually is.
I 100% agree with you/Kavanaugh that this should have been the job of Congress to add protected classes explicitly by law. It would have been very easy for them to do... especially in '09-'10 when Obama had a supermajority, but alas Democrats really don't give a shit about trans rights. They knew that once they give trans people their rights then there's no reason for trans people to support Democrats anymore lol.
That said, I also agree with Gorsuch's ruling... which is a secret red pill.
Gorsuch's opinion basically has a couple examples. Let's say person X is attracted to men. If you're ok with X being female but not male then this is sex discrimination.
Now let's pretend that person X dresses up and identifies as a woman. If person X is female and you're ok with that but not if X is male then that is also sex discrimination.
But guess what this also means? It means that this entire case is based on the premise that SEX is a protected class. It relies on recognizing that males and females are biological characteristics ingrained in our DNA. And at least until a male cuts up his penis into a vagina and vice versa then it also means that males = penises and females = vaginas.
We have ALL seen leftists getting enraged for calling trans women males even though yes they are biologically male. They can no longer get upset about this imo (they will anyway but they don't really have any right to anymore). Their sex status is literally what is protecting them now because there is no protected gender class.
Damn. That's an interesting interpretation. A tranny can only file for sexual discrimination if he admits that he is biologically a man.
Checkmate
Extremely good explanation. With that in mind, the ruling seems like a huge win even though it was not the expected outcome.