Since first posting in light humor about 6 hours ago on this thread... have been mulling over the problematic issues sure to arise: whether its an orderly/assistant in a Dr's office or hospital... or a chaperone/supervisor at a children's camp... or a dressing room attendant at a department store (if there are any left post-Covid) - those are service providers to the public/customers. It is not unreasonable to think that a customer of said enterprise might have a preference to the service provider in that regard. So... a female customer in the dressing rooms or the gynecologist's office or her daughter's day camp requests a female who identifies as a female - and the manager accommodates the request - but it happens so often there is really no need for the continued employment of Robert(a). What next when the lawsuit is filed?
Since first posting in light humor about 6 hours ago on this thread... have been mulling over the problematic issues sure to arise: whether its an orderly/assistant in a Dr's office or hospital... or a chaperone/supervisor at a children's camp... or a dressing room attendant at a department store (if there are any left post-Covid) - those are service providers to the public/customers. It is not unreasonable to think that a customer of said enterprise might have a preference to the service provider in that regard. So... a female customer in the dressing rooms or the gynecologist's office or her daughter's day camp requests a female who identifies as a female - and the manager accommodates the request - but it happens so often there is really no need for the continued employment of Robert(a). What next when the lawsuit is filed?