Clarence Thomas: SCOTUS Protects Abortion, 'Looks Other Way' on 2A
(www.breitbart.com)
🔥 FIRE & FURY 💥
Comments (339)
sorted by:
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES
•
All
General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
A justice left of him shouldn’t even be allowed on the SCOTUS.
we need to get rid of the Liberals on the court. but also and just as importantly some red States should actually try it. has an abortion ban that requires a woman to show a justifiable need for an abortion
know what? while we're at it we should have Texas and some other red States passed laws against CNN showing that they have a justifiable need to report the news before they are allowed to even broadcast in the state..
let's see how quickly the supreme Court defends them. and maybe of Court justices prove that they are biased and able to do their jobs properly we can remove themm
These are all great ideas.
Also some sort of major lawsuit against 2nd Amendment infringement.
Hijacking to link to this great (surprisingly for PBS) Clarence Thomas autobiography:
https://www.pbs.org/video/created-equal-clarence-thomas-in-his-own-words-rymp6z/
I had no idea he was originally enticed by the left. His story is touching, amazing, tragic and also uplifting. Also interesting to see the left's playbook has not changed one bit. I agree with you all, we need more like him.
The stuff that the court threw out were lawsuits against 2A infringement.
I'm fairly certain that the law that was challenged in Roe v. Wade was one where abortions were only allowed under certain circumstances, aka "justifiable need". I think Alabama's law that penalizes doctors for performing abortions is a better way as it, at least as far as I can remember, hasn't been ruled on in court.
Another alternative would be establishing some kind of case topic quota where SCOTUS must hear at least the opening arguments for a minimum number of cases related to certain topics per year.
It's time to deport them all, whether they like it or not. And I don't care if they're technically citizens, either. Fuck them all.
While I love this thought this is something that can be am extremely sharp double edged sword.
We're well past the point where we should be standing on principles. Our enemies have none, and refusing to bend ours simply means we lose.
We're dealing with communists burning cities, communist DAs, governors and mayors letting them, and communist media spewing outright lies to further erode public faith in police and contribute to their complete destruction of our nation. Now is not the time to stand on principle. Principles are extended to those who have them. Our enemies have none.
A person to the left of him shouldn't be allowed. Period. Got it Jack? I DON'T WORK FOR YOU!
Listen here fat
A person left of him shouldn’t have the right to live
The left tries to stack the court with activists, THEY want to change the Constitution, not us. Fucking cunts love trying to say we want to "stack" the court. Infuriating.
They actively say that the constitution is outdated, and/or it is a “living, interpretable (to however they like)” document.
You are just as ignorant with your assertion that you know how the founding fathers would have felt. They did not have the benefit of the knowledge technology has given us, to say you know how they would have felt is asinine.
People were more Christian then, and there was more respect for life than today. Abortion would have been unheard of.