Clarence Thomas: SCOTUS Protects Abortion, 'Looks Other Way' on 2A
(www.breitbart.com)
🔥 FIRE & FURY 💥
Comments (339)
sorted by:
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES
•
All
General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
we need to get rid of the Liberals on the court. but also and just as importantly some red States should actually try it. has an abortion ban that requires a woman to show a justifiable need for an abortion
know what? while we're at it we should have Texas and some other red States passed laws against CNN showing that they have a justifiable need to report the news before they are allowed to even broadcast in the state..
let's see how quickly the supreme Court defends them. and maybe of Court justices prove that they are biased and able to do their jobs properly we can remove themm
These are all great ideas.
Also some sort of major lawsuit against 2nd Amendment infringement.
Hijacking to link to this great (surprisingly for PBS) Clarence Thomas autobiography:
https://www.pbs.org/video/created-equal-clarence-thomas-in-his-own-words-rymp6z/
I had no idea he was originally enticed by the left. His story is touching, amazing, tragic and also uplifting. Also interesting to see the left's playbook has not changed one bit. I agree with you all, we need more like him.
Thanking you for your great link by providing this one on how Thomas Sowell converted from Marxism to Capitalism by his own free thinking:
https://youtu.be/mS5WYp5xmvI
And thank you! I had recently heard that but hadn't done my research. This is great! I'll watch it in the morning.
Now I'm wondering if Shelby Steele might have had a similar path to conservatism...
The stuff that the court threw out were lawsuits against 2A infringement.
Someone here said it’s because they’re waiting to get another non leftist judge since Roberts is compromised.
I'm fairly certain that the law that was challenged in Roe v. Wade was one where abortions were only allowed under certain circumstances, aka "justifiable need". I think Alabama's law that penalizes doctors for performing abortions is a better way as it, at least as far as I can remember, hasn't been ruled on in court.
Another alternative would be establishing some kind of case topic quota where SCOTUS must hear at least the opening arguments for a minimum number of cases related to certain topics per year.