You are just as ignorant with your assertion that you know how the founding fathers would have felt. They did not have the benefit of the knowledge technology has given us, to say you know how they would have felt is asinine.
This isnt a counter argument. You are talking about not even 1% or abortions. You are also prescribing religous beliefs when it isnt about religion. Government is in the business of protecting life. So we can talk about how to deal with those <1% of current abortions if you agree that the rest is not ok or you can fuck off and ree back on reddit.
No it isn’t. I am just talking about what he said. No one is going to sit here and pretend they can read the minds of anyone, let alone our forefathers that are long since dead. It’s ridiculous. I’m not advocating for or against abortion, I’m just saying what he said was dumb.
Not necessarily because modern technology have muddied the citizenship clause:
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.
In addition, we now have a better understanding of life, and with technology advancing as it has, we may get to the point where a woman isn't even necessary to carry a baby... which makes the entire birth side of things rather confusing as (for example) a baby grown completely in an artificial womb should still carry the same rights as one that was carried by a woman.
Additionally, if the founding fathers knew what we knew now about human development, I'm betting they would probably side with the conservatives and consider abortion to be murder.
That said, as high as the infant mortality rate was back in the late 1700's, I'm betting many of them would look at someone wanting an abortion as if it was a really bad joke.
You are just as ignorant with your assertion that you know how the founding fathers would have felt. They did not have the benefit of the knowledge technology has given us, to say you know how they would have felt is asinine.
The definition of life didnt change. We just discovered when it really starts.
This isnt a counter argument. You are talking about not even 1% or abortions. You are also prescribing religous beliefs when it isnt about religion. Government is in the business of protecting life. So we can talk about how to deal with those <1% of current abortions if you agree that the rest is not ok or you can fuck off and ree back on reddit.
No it isn’t. I am just talking about what he said. No one is going to sit here and pretend they can read the minds of anyone, let alone our forefathers that are long since dead. It’s ridiculous. I’m not advocating for or against abortion, I’m just saying what he said was dumb.
Not necessarily because modern technology have muddied the citizenship clause:
In addition, we now have a better understanding of life, and with technology advancing as it has, we may get to the point where a woman isn't even necessary to carry a baby... which makes the entire birth side of things rather confusing as (for example) a baby grown completely in an artificial womb should still carry the same rights as one that was carried by a woman.
Additionally, if the founding fathers knew what we knew now about human development, I'm betting they would probably side with the conservatives and consider abortion to be murder.
That said, as high as the infant mortality rate was back in the late 1700's, I'm betting many of them would look at someone wanting an abortion as if it was a really bad joke.