I'm fairly certain that the law that was challenged in Roe v. Wade was one where abortions were only allowed under certain circumstances, aka "justifiable need". I think Alabama's law that penalizes doctors for performing abortions is a better way as it, at least as far as I can remember, hasn't been ruled on in court.

Another alternative would be establishing some kind of case topic quota where SCOTUS must hear at least the opening arguments for a minimum number of cases related to certain topics per year.