BREAKING: Six justices of Supreme Court attack our republican form of government --rewrite federal civil rights law, in exercise of raw judicial power, to change definition of "sex" to "sexual orientation" and "gender identity." Legislating from the bench is an abuse of power.
(twitter.com)
⚠ NSFCucks ⚠
Comments (32)
sorted by:
Justice for life needs to be abolished. These justices need to be held accountable. I don't know how, but we need to figure it out.
We all know how. We're just waiting for the signal.
No no no we cannot have that. If you remove the justice for life you would make the courts no better than congress. What we need is a way to legislate around the ruling in order to supersede the ruling, or call the ruling a violation. There is probably something doable if the senate and house turn red with Trump still in office.
Absolutely do not remove the balance of the for life position. It will have far greater consequences.
That would actually result in even less conservative judges
Pfff. No.
There would ONLY BE CONSERVATIVES JUDGES
.... uh , ok.... so do you think people born 80 years ago or more conservative or less conservative than people are today ?
We dont even have to guess about this. There is no argument. Just look at the Senate and House. Senators can be in power way longer than members of the house. As a result they create way more stability. You should take five minutes and see the sort of legislation that gets passed in the house and then see how much of it gets shut down in the Senate. Look at the crazy AOC style representatives that exist in the house and compare that to the Senate
I guess you didn't quite understand what I was saying...
Something something no lefties left after we open the ammo boxes.
Ya. You’re a poor communicator
This is how the one world religion is established. It doesn’t matter what your church will be called you will all comply. I was in a prayer group with an attorney who said that churches are now going to have a hard time firing their music minister if the come out. Christian colleges will not be able to exclude gay or adulterous professors. It’s coming.
This is a horrible ruling and a reminder of why we need to reelect president Trump. He is amazing at appointing good judges and we need another four years of that.
Are they bad when he appoints them? Or does the invisible enemy get to them after they’re appointed?
He appointed Gorsuch, I believe. The other "conservative" was Roberts, who upheld Obamacare. Those 2 + the 4 liberals are what did it, not both of Trump's picks.
The ONLY possible good thing about this ruling is that the left has one less issue to use against us in the election. Trump hasn't done much in the past year that will truly piss off liberals such as replace RBG (not that he can atm), kill Obamacare (or make another attempt), or define gender as chromosomes/genitalia you are born with. He is taking away ammo the left could be using against us right now. This is a big loss, but it isn't impossible to undo (but unlikely). While I doubt it will happen, our best bet is to hope that Trump or Congress (fat chance) fixes it after November if/when Trump wins re-election.
One of the appointees was in on the decision.
I have to say Im a bit disappointed, not because I give a rats ass about LGBTQXYZ issues, but because it seems like the definition of a word was conveniently altered in a legal proceeding.
Wow, the left continues to throw everything at Trump
2020 is no where close to done...
They've made their ruling, now let them enforce it.
I vow, from this day forward, to discriminate against anyone who identifies as anything other than male or female.
Treason by Gorsuch and Roberts... I hope Trump ousts them after 2020.
Short of them dying or resigning, I don't believe he can. He would've taken RBG and Stratomeyer off already if so.
I think Roberts was not inclined to join the majority but saw it was going to pass 5-4. So he joined the majority.
Because Roberts is the senior juror as Chief, he thus got to pick who would author the opinion. He appointed Gorsuch.
Otherwise the person deciding who would author the opinion would have been... RBG.
Gorsuch wrote a much more measured and limited opinion than RBG or her delegate would have. For example it says nothing about when this law comes in conflict with laws protecting religious freedom.
So I suspect Roberts joined the majority to soften the impact.
Had Gorsuch and Roberts both stuck to conservative principles it should have gone the other way. Clear Congress was not writing about men who cut their penis off when they wrote the law those decades ago!
Please, the leftists don't even do that. Those idiots wake up and say, "I am a girl now because I say I am," and call it good.
Buy ammo. This ends one way.
Gorsuch clearly defined trannies as male.
It is sexual discrimination to not allow a man to do what you would allow a woman to do. Like it or not, that is accurate.
Supreme Court justices should have terms and limits. They should be elected every six years by the Senate. Every decision or argument they made during their tenure is scrutinized. To remove, you have to have a supermajority (you don’t want the balance of power to completely shift based on which party wins the Senate by a slim majority). Justices should also be apolitical. They should be barred from being registered or donating to or affiliating with a political party (Ginsberg and Thomas, for example, would either have to resign or quit their parties). We should also work towards a constitutional amendment setting limitations on the powers of the court. They should only be able to judge whether laws are constitutional or not, whether someone’s rights have been infringed upon, and whether state laws are contrary to the constitution.
Is there any way the United States could adopt polycentric law?
This is to destroy the church.
Honestly get over this shit. It's meaningless. If a fucked dude wants to wear a dress have at it. It doesn't mean I have to give them one second of my time. Look fat, if I had a kid and they where having tranny reading day, they'd be sick that day. Truth is my kid would (did) go to Catholic school and to this point trannies ain't on the agenda.
They can still be refused for politics.
"You support democrats, leave my business." It catches everything.