546
Comments (32)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
9
silent_majority_2020 9 points ago +9 / -0

This is a horrible ruling and a reminder of why we need to reelect president Trump. He is amazing at appointing good judges and we need another four years of that.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
2
PigBeenBorn 2 points ago +2 / -0

Are they bad when he appoints them? Or does the invisible enemy get to them after they’re appointed?

1
LibsOnSuicideWatch 1 point ago +1 / -0

He appointed Gorsuch, I believe. The other "conservative" was Roberts, who upheld Obamacare. Those 2 + the 4 liberals are what did it, not both of Trump's picks.

The ONLY possible good thing about this ruling is that the left has one less issue to use against us in the election. Trump hasn't done much in the past year that will truly piss off liberals such as replace RBG (not that he can atm), kill Obamacare (or make another attempt), or define gender as chromosomes/genitalia you are born with. He is taking away ammo the left could be using against us right now. This is a big loss, but it isn't impossible to undo (but unlikely). While I doubt it will happen, our best bet is to hope that Trump or Congress (fat chance) fixes it after November if/when Trump wins re-election.

6
Don-O-Mite 6 points ago +6 / -0

One of the appointees was in on the decision.

I have to say Im a bit disappointed, not because I give a rats ass about LGBTQXYZ issues, but because it seems like the definition of a word was conveniently altered in a legal proceeding.