The evidence is now "cause I said so" or "that's how I feel".
Let that sink in.
Our Supreme Court is now accepting feelings and proclamation as facts and they are allowing that to be the basis of a finding for someone else's wrong-doing.
What you just said was deeply hurtful to me Italians_Invented_2A. I would venture to say it was even ... criminally hateful ... (pinky to mouth corner) MUHAHAHAHAHAH!
The ruling specifically mentioned that the perceptions or self-identified gender ideas were immaterial to the argument, it was employers’ basing discriminatory actions dependent on their biological sex that triggered the law.
Yeah, yeah... wait until the circuit courts interpret this ruling. They will interpret this however the fuck they want. And, it will all come at a cost to white, christian, men.
At a pharmaceutical company that's developing "the vaccine," a lady got fired for refusing to use the same locker room as the man with a penis claiming he was a woman. She lost a good paying job. This was years ago.
This year, the man is still a man and got married to a woman.
Thanks Gorswitch!
Well, female sport is discrimination based on sex. The text of the law says so. Checkmate TERFs
The evidence is now "cause I said so" or "that's how I feel".
Let that sink in.
Our Supreme Court is now accepting feelings and proclamation as facts and they are allowing that to be the basis of a finding for someone else's wrong-doing.
AAAHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAA [Deep Breath] AAAHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAA
Sigh.
[Start crying. Realizing it's not a joke] < I am right here.
Additional Gun Purchases & FUCKING BOATLOADS of ammo
More target practice
Revised security operations in/around properties
Forging of new alliances based on Rule of Actual Law
????
Just like in the UK, where something is a hate crime only if it's perceived by the victim or by any other person
I'm not joking, the law actually says perceived
What if I perceive that law as hateful?
Technically lots of things on left wing media like the guardian or the BBC are hate crimes. They commit hate crime all the time.
But the laws are used only against white men.
What you just said was deeply hurtful to me Italians_Invented_2A. I would venture to say it was even ... criminally hateful ... (pinky to mouth corner) MUHAHAHAHAHAH!
Technically that’s not true.
The ruling specifically mentioned that the perceptions or self-identified gender ideas were immaterial to the argument, it was employers’ basing discriminatory actions dependent on their biological sex that triggered the law.
Yeah, yeah... wait until the circuit courts interpret this ruling. They will interpret this however the fuck they want. And, it will all come at a cost to white, christian, men.
Mark it down.
Tell me how I'm wrong.
You’re technically wrong, is how.
Story time.
At a pharmaceutical company that's developing "the vaccine," a lady got fired for refusing to use the same locker room as the man with a penis claiming he was a woman. She lost a good paying job. This was years ago.
This year, the man is still a man and got married to a woman.
I mean we can use it to our advantage too. There’s plenty of “sexual identities” where you could be married but be “non-straight”
I'm a citizen of the US in another dimension, so laws don't apply to me--outside of their jurisdiction