Win uses cookies necessary for site functionality, as well as for personalization. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.
Exactly. If Repubs were just 1/4 as ballsy as the Dims the country would be much better off and people would be in jail. Bunch of weak ass cowards. All of them minus a few.
Yeah I've pretty much unsubd from all of them. OH you owned them crowder/pool/mr.obvious/quartering etc. NOW WHAT?
nothing will happen.
Remove the cuckservatives and replace them with patriots
You do understand that most of these are, more often than not, congresscritters out looking for bigger campaign donations. Microsoft learned this lesson in the late 1990s (they went from 1-2 lobbyists with a few bucks in 1997, to having a near-army of them and a massive lobbying budget by 2001.)
This is like Warren claiming she would have gone after the "Silicon Valley monopolies" during the primaries, if elected.
Yeah, sure you would have, Shitting Bull. The same "Silicon Valley monopolies" who paid for your last Senate campaign and will no doubt pay for the next as well...
Meanwhile, the Democrats use mob justice to get their agendas done. Half the country is seriously discussing something as ridiculous as defunding the police
I know. Why is anyone afraid of this bullshit? Who cares what they call you? These people are idiots and totally unhinged lunatics. Stop caving in to them and have some balls!
My thought is the right represents the traditional bourgeois middle class that historically supports whatever existing paradigm happens to exist at the time.
It doesn't even have to be a capitalistic system; under communism, we would have been called apparatchiks. Bottom line - conservatives under any system are the "winners", so they have everything to lose.
The losers are the disenfranchised with literally nothing at stake. Since they're not part of the professional class, there are also emotional & intelligence differentials at play.
Bottom line is that the under-class are the change agents. I've even come to believe that the so-called "greatest generation" were simply that era's antifa losers drafted into the military and trained to fight.
The winners would have been either officers, and/or engineers/production managers in logistics & planning for the various armaments industries.
However, this all being said, the left will need more institutional influence if they wish to succeed. Revolutions almost always tend to fail, simply because the moneyed interests ultimately determine whether or not it's in their collective interest to support/abandon.
That's all lip-service meant to placate Leftists and nothing else, in reality they'd need a incredibly vast war chest to fund a successful revolution (guns, food, vehicles, fuel, clothes. etc) which some like Soros wouldn't be able to fund entirely.
(Hell, the donations their currently getting aren't enough ether)
Totally. Heard one leftist say there's no federal solution for covid (apparently completely forgetting about the guidelines and thinking GEOTUS has to baby every state to normalcy). Heard another say the "second wave" in town was caused by greedy business owners, and had nothing at all to do with the riots.
More like the left fights dirty(kicks to the nuts, eye gouges, brass knucks).
Meanwhile the right refuses to to use dirty tricks and be, "no, we are better than that", while they're paralyzed with nut pain, blinded, getting their head cracked open and just getting their asses beat the fuck down.
The left always plays their only card, which is propaganda. Consider their base is comprised in general of not only the less intelligent (except for intellectual theorists), as well as more highly charged emotionals.
So it makes perfect sense to utilize all forms of media in an attempt to mold, direct and influence cultural movements within this segment of the population.
It's not even necessary for a respective industry leaders (Goolge, FB, et al) to begin operations as left-wing tools. Rather, once a dominant leader is identified, financial control can be enacted to then further groom and shap for direct political purposes.
This pattern consistently repeats throughout history - it really is the same old, same old.
The job of the right wing is to hold fast; this is a marathon, not a sprint. The advantage almost always lies with the defenders. All you need is resources, discipline and motivation to prevail.
We are of the opinion that some action should be taken in a reasonable time-span to address the possible conflict of interest of a news agency being allowed to lobby the ad monopoly to defund their competition, maybe.
We will set a date to review the course of action in the next few weeks and then convene, only to postpone the actual review of potential actions until November 4th.
I have personally put forward a proposal to monitor the situation, and we will be setting a timetable to have a meeting to propose a meeting to monitor the initial proposal while we meet to propose new situational monitoring.
FOIA request all communication of those involved. I don't know why we cannot request financial audits of career employees who are hired to protect the public.
Point of privilege! You are implying that being a mf is a bad thing and I'm offended by that. Didn't you know that fing m's is not only okay now, but it's encouraged. Not only that, but you must take an active role in advocating for fing ms in the community. If you don't, you're a racist.
If we're lucky, in two years some lawsuits might eventually find their way to court seeking damages against Twitter or FB over statements made on their sites.
It's a tremendous win! You must be a shill trying to demoralize us! These future lawsuits for damages which may or may not happen will certainly lead Twitter and Facebook to stop censoring us before the election! They must be trembling right now!
And thank God the Trump administration took this seriously on day one. Just think if they had only started now, just 5 months before the election.
Winning!!
Your point is well taken. But I can't help but think that the current climate of big tech censorship backfires on the censors. It's pure evil, and some folks are fooled by it, but plenty of folks see through it now and are incensed by it. Everyone in that last group will show up to vote for Trump and to take the House back. The folks who are oblivious to the censorship are just generally oblivious; they may or may not vote.
Remember when it came out that facebook was manipulating the newsfeeds of people who exhibited signs of mental illness to see if they could lessen or intensify the symptoms? It’d be a shame if they were opened up to some sort of class action lawsuit over performing psychological experiments on their users without said users’ express knowledge or consent.
Big tech reps testify in Congress and tell lie after lie. Nothing happens. All "mistakes" they make harm conservatives. Their apologies and promises to do better are worthless.
Anecdotally, i would see a lot of warnings over my friends' post over the last three months over things that weren't offensive. I haven't seen the warning to see "offensive" content over similar posts in the last two weeks.
I’m genuinely not sure of what the proper legislation is to ensure liberty is preserved. No one should be forced to bake a cake or wax some balls, but a near monopoly certainly has a higher obligation. Can Visa and MasterCard refuse your business if you are outed as a churchgoer or firearm owner? Does this obligation happen when forming a corporation or do they merely have to be large enough?
That is a great point about service and customer, especially for smaller businesses. If some LARPer walked in to my local Jewish deli dressed in a SS uniform, I believe they should be able to refuse service. If that same person was refused service because they donated to a campaign of someone who didn’t disavow nazis to an arbitrary standard of disavowal, that should not be okay. This is even more important for business with national scope.
Personally, I'd make it if a social media company has more than 1% of the US population with accounts that can contribute, it should be considered as the public square with similar first amendment protections.
Twitter, Facebook, Google would all be subject to this.
That is to say, any lawful media posted to Twitter, Facebook, Youtube should be generally available to any adult present in the United States who opts to view it.
I agree that there is an enforcement problem of anti trust laws. Sure.
But realize that any competitor will be at a massive disadvantage re capital both financially and per their already existing user base. And that is before Big Tech can just copy the competitor, write a check and buy them up or censor them outright after their media alies smear them.
That is insurmountable unless there is some huge technological change.
Boycotts don't work. Never have never will. Individuals don't have the ability to change things just with their consumer choices. There's a reason the left tries to ban things instead of boycotting them.
Their way seems more effective. People get raided at 4am, they go to prison, their lives are ruined. We investigate until the statute of limitations expires and the perps write best selling books and teach harvard classes.
That's a good point... And some of them have been fined heavily. Over here Google et al pays every Congressman so much money they're nothing but lapdogs.
Trump needs to create an EO that addresses this fiasco.
Funny,
Congress is very busy taking qualified immunity away from police who carry out there edicts. While insuring that they only give lip service about the great masters attempting to interfere with an election.
Not sure why your getting down voted by zealots who don't believe in America first but rather if you don't agree with everything Trump's cabinet does then you are wrong. Mind blowing collectivist mindset.
Go for it, make them earn it every year. If they want the immunity they have to prove they are section 230 compliant. Else they can live and function like everyone else.
Hawley or Scott - we need a bill that allows certain career employees to be audited financially. We know large corporations have corrupted career employees. FOIA is usually limited. We should have the power to identify corruption.
I'll probably get some heat for this but Zuck is infinitely better than most of these guys. IMHO it would be smart to work with that but I doubt it'll happen.
“Propose,” “thinking about,” “will discuss,” “in preliminary talks to,” “gathering information about,” “leaning towards,” “studying.” Our DOJ and our illustrious AG sure are amazing aren’t they folks? Being a conservative is about 6 months away from being a jailable offense in this country but our DOJ/AG and their crack team of pearl clutchers are hard at work making sure conservatism isn’t banned at least until Christmas.
Not sure why your getting down voted by zealots who don't believe in America first but rather if you don't agree with everything Trump's cabinet does then you are wrong. Mind blowing collectivist mindset.
Oh boy here comes another sternly worded letter!
"Propose"
"Considering"
"Looking into"
"Concerned about"
"Troubling"
Just fucking DO IT!
It’s almost like they are Paid by Google for controlled opposition.
What secrets does big tech have on our DOJ, congress?
Everything they could purchase from the Awan brothers.
Who’d have thought Alex Jones was right? The frogs are gay and they’re kiddie fuckers.
I mean Google knows absolutely everything, and can probably predict reliably what you are doing or thinking.
Not if you don’t use their products or any of the other Silicon Valley spyware apps like twatter and Facebook
If you don't use any Google products what they do is create a ghost profile of you using anyone close to you who does. Same as fb.
For real? I never heard of that.
Lindsay's Cloud Data.
Their browser history.
Google also knows all your gps coordinates .
Yes, and it can tell if you have a back or leg problem by the way that your phone's movement centers pick up your walking pace.
At this point, I don't trust anyone.
Trump. You should trust him.
That's it for me.
I want to but nothing's happened yet. He's the best chance we have so I'll keep my fingers crossed
Nah man the Republicans are small-government conservatives!!
Lol /s
Hahahahahahahaha
ConTROLLED Opposition
Buy some as words for that nice compliant against me
Too much political prostitution to actually make a change.
Republicans are worse than Dems. At least the Dems openly hate us. Repubs are cowards and cucks.
Exactly. If Repubs were just 1/4 as ballsy as the Dims the country would be much better off and people would be in jail. Bunch of weak ass cowards. All of them minus a few.
They don't organize. The whole lot of them need a flushing.
Maybe <"CONSERVATIVE" TAKING HEAD #72> will own the libs on YouTube!!
Yeah I've pretty much unsubd from all of them. OH you owned them crowder/pool/mr.obvious/quartering etc. NOW WHAT? nothing will happen. Remove the cuckservatives and replace them with patriots
You do understand that most of these are, more often than not, congresscritters out looking for bigger campaign donations. Microsoft learned this lesson in the late 1990s (they went from 1-2 lobbyists with a few bucks in 1997, to having a near-army of them and a massive lobbying budget by 2001.)
Yes. It's a shake-down. No legislation with any legal teeth will pass once Big Tech "donates" to their favorite corrupt pol - of both parties.
And their lawyers began writing the laws to favor them.
This is like Warren claiming she would have gone after the "Silicon Valley monopolies" during the primaries, if elected.
Yeah, sure you would have, Shitting Bull. The same "Silicon Valley monopolies" who paid for your last Senate campaign and will no doubt pay for the next as well...
he meant trump is in for the prosecutor team, not the big tech team
Meanwhile, the Democrats use mob justice to get their agendas done. Half the country is seriously discussing something as ridiculous as defunding the police
The left fights as if we are at war ... because we are.
The political right cowers in the corner ... as is tradition.
Don't want some blonde bimbo news babe to call you raaaaycisss. Or even worse, a BLACK MAN OH NO
I know. Why is anyone afraid of this bullshit? Who cares what they call you? These people are idiots and totally unhinged lunatics. Stop caving in to them and have some balls!
My thought is the right represents the traditional bourgeois middle class that historically supports whatever existing paradigm happens to exist at the time.
It doesn't even have to be a capitalistic system; under communism, we would have been called apparatchiks. Bottom line - conservatives under any system are the "winners", so they have everything to lose.
The losers are the disenfranchised with literally nothing at stake. Since they're not part of the professional class, there are also emotional & intelligence differentials at play.
Bottom line is that the under-class are the change agents. I've even come to believe that the so-called "greatest generation" were simply that era's antifa losers drafted into the military and trained to fight.
The winners would have been either officers, and/or engineers/production managers in logistics & planning for the various armaments industries.
However, this all being said, the left will need more institutional influence if they wish to succeed. Revolutions almost always tend to fail, simply because the moneyed interests ultimately determine whether or not it's in their collective interest to support/abandon.
How much more institutional influence do they need? All the big corporations support them even after getting their stores torched.
That's all lip-service meant to placate Leftists and nothing else, in reality they'd need a incredibly vast war chest to fund a successful revolution (guns, food, vehicles, fuel, clothes. etc) which some like Soros wouldn't be able to fund entirely.
(Hell, the donations their currently getting aren't enough ether)
Totally. Heard one leftist say there's no federal solution for covid (apparently completely forgetting about the guidelines and thinking GEOTUS has to baby every state to normalcy). Heard another say the "second wave" in town was caused by greedy business owners, and had nothing at all to do with the riots.
Greed, for lack of a better word, is good."
More like the left fights dirty(kicks to the nuts, eye gouges, brass knucks).
Meanwhile the right refuses to to use dirty tricks and be, "no, we are better than that", while they're paralyzed with nut pain, blinded, getting their head cracked open and just getting their asses beat the fuck down.
I'd settle for the political right fighting back like a gay Harvard freshman, at this point.
The political right isn't fighting back at all.
Do you think they will use Comic Sans again?
Oh actually if its going to Cuckerberg then it might be just Binary in times new Roman font.
Wtf why would they send it to Elizabeth Warren?
smoke signals
Arial 12 if you want the least content on the maximum amount of pages without being obvious about it. Got me through college.
Arial > Helvetica
Fight me.
We are not leftists. Civil discourse ftw
DOJ should just use Wing Dings
Dear Google.. You stop you big meanie, or else I'll send you another sternly worded letter.
The left always plays their only card, which is propaganda. Consider their base is comprised in general of not only the less intelligent (except for intellectual theorists), as well as more highly charged emotionals.
So it makes perfect sense to utilize all forms of media in an attempt to mold, direct and influence cultural movements within this segment of the population.
It's not even necessary for a respective industry leaders (Goolge, FB, et al) to begin operations as left-wing tools. Rather, once a dominant leader is identified, financial control can be enacted to then further groom and shap for direct political purposes.
This pattern consistently repeats throughout history - it really is the same old, same old.
The job of the right wing is to hold fast; this is a marathon, not a sprint. The advantage almost always lies with the defenders. All you need is resources, discipline and motivation to prevail.
Hey, they may make Zuck come sit on a phone book for a while.
STFU , WE are Winning! Did you hear that Trump is monitoring the situation? /s
We are of the opinion that some action should be taken in a reasonable time-span to address the possible conflict of interest of a news agency being allowed to lobby the ad monopoly to defund their competition, maybe.
We will set a date to review the course of action in the next few weeks and then convene, only to postpone the actual review of potential actions until November 4th.
I have personally put forward a proposal to monitor the situation, and we will be setting a timetable to have a meeting to propose a meeting to monitor the initial proposal while we meet to propose new situational monitoring.
I’ll get excited when something actually happens
FOIA request all communication of those involved. I don't know why we cannot request financial audits of career employees who are hired to protect the public.
Exactly.
Imho, it is already too late. So many conservative voices are already gone, plus many that would have come to be over that last 4 years.
Lol @ your username!!
Dear God! That'll clear the room.
oh god, now this is in my brain
Amazon is doing very well because of the Pandemic.
Amazon owns the Washington comPost.
The Washington comPost has been publishing articles telling us how we all need to be locked down.
Surely there is no problem with big tech and the media. They're all operating completely honestly.
Jeff has increased his net worth by at least 50%, from my estimate.
But he's not white so he's not as privileged as you
pfff, that mf is shaun king white
Point of privilege! You are implying that being a mf is a bad thing and I'm offended by that. Didn't you know that fing m's is not only okay now, but it's encouraged. Not only that, but you must take an active role in advocating for fing ms in the community. If you don't, you're a racist.
Not to mention the controlled information universe by 1 large group that hates Americans.
I'm with you, but I don't think this proposition would impact that theory at all
If we're lucky, in two years some lawsuits might eventually find their way to court seeking damages against Twitter or FB over statements made on their sites.
Winning! I can't take anymore of it!!
The cases will just so happen to go to the court of a far-left Obama-appointed judge! What a coincidence!
In DC.
Hawaii
It's a tremendous win! You must be a shill trying to demoralize us! These future lawsuits for damages which may or may not happen will certainly lead Twitter and Facebook to stop censoring us before the election! They must be trembling right now!
And thank God the Trump administration took this seriously on day one. Just think if they had only started now, just 5 months before the election. Winning!!
Because this is Congress's playing field and they already getting their paycheck from the wrong place.
If Sec 230 of CDA were revised to open Google, FB and Twit up to liability, the EU lawsuits would bankrupt them in a matter of months.
They have been salivating over this for years.
Why would EU’s judicial system give one fuck about a US law?
What is this?
The EU judges them according to its own laws.
The EU stood up against big tech several times, we have to give them that.
O.K. That's interesting. But how far are they going to get in US courts? Sec 230 is not "international law". It's US law.
Your point is well taken. But I can't help but think that the current climate of big tech censorship backfires on the censors. It's pure evil, and some folks are fooled by it, but plenty of folks see through it now and are incensed by it. Everyone in that last group will show up to vote for Trump and to take the House back. The folks who are oblivious to the censorship are just generally oblivious; they may or may not vote.
I want to believe it. I really do, but I've seen this circus for the past 4 years and NOTHING IS DONE ABOUT IT. EVER.
Prove me wrong!
The day the muslim ban was stopped we knew. We had a Republican house and senate for 2 years and still nothing got done.
Agreed. Did the recent Executive Order signed by POTUS change anything?
Or Gorsuch will stab us in the back.
I hear the dirt on Gorsuch has been leaked. It's an internet rumor and unverified but it would be great if it comes true.
He likes backpage trannies on the weekend?
That's Rubio
If congress changes the law, there wont be anything the SCOTUS can do about it. If......
Remember when it came out that facebook was manipulating the newsfeeds of people who exhibited signs of mental illness to see if they could lessen or intensify the symptoms? It’d be a shame if they were opened up to some sort of class action lawsuit over performing psychological experiments on their users without said users’ express knowledge or consent.
spez: archive link for those who might not have known: http://archive.is/sUUOP
spez2: Per @TheMAGAnificent’s inquiry some additional context and, also, acknowledgment that I may be conflating two separate things: https://www.technologyreview.com/2017/05/01/105987/is-facebook-targeting-ads-at-sad-teens/
Where does it say mental illness?
Admittedly, The Atlantic isn’t a great source. Also, because it’s been a few years, I may be conflating two different things...
https://www.technologyreview.com/2017/05/01/105987/is-facebook-targeting-ads-at-sad-teens/
Don't propose. Do. They've been "thinking about" shit for years while Big Tech's iron grip has tightened more and more.
These tech companies are extensions of the democrat party and we still got corporate bootlickers in the Republican party.
These companies are fearless and their actions indicate that they are very confident about Republicans doing absolutely fucking nothing about this.
Big tech reps testify in Congress and tell lie after lie. Nothing happens. All "mistakes" they make harm conservatives. Their apologies and promises to do better are worthless.
"We're sorry...so sorry..."
nipple rubbing intensifies
Zuckerberg knew this was coming, it's why FB stopped censoring posts. He may be a disgusting, leftist android, but he is savvy.
It's why I think there will be actual legislation, not just a strongly worded letter.
Explain please, Facebook changed something you say?
News link
Anecdotally, i would see a lot of warnings over my friends' post over the last three months over things that weren't offensive. I haven't seen the warning to see "offensive" content over similar posts in the last two weeks.
I read the article from that far left rag, and what does it say? That pressure is mounting on Zuck to censor more, not less.
I hope what you're saying is right (I don't have Facebook so I don't know).
I’m genuinely not sure of what the proper legislation is to ensure liberty is preserved. No one should be forced to bake a cake or wax some balls, but a near monopoly certainly has a higher obligation. Can Visa and MasterCard refuse your business if you are outed as a churchgoer or firearm owner? Does this obligation happen when forming a corporation or do they merely have to be large enough?
Simple. Like you're saying, big businesses need to be held at a higher standard so non discrimination laws must apply only to them.
,
That is a great point about service and customer, especially for smaller businesses. If some LARPer walked in to my local Jewish deli dressed in a SS uniform, I believe they should be able to refuse service. If that same person was refused service because they donated to a campaign of someone who didn’t disavow nazis to an arbitrary standard of disavowal, that should not be okay. This is even more important for business with national scope.
Anti trust laws have to be enforced. But wont. And second people need to stop patronizing businesses that are against their interests. But again wont.
Personally, I'd make it if a social media company has more than 1% of the US population with accounts that can contribute, it should be considered as the public square with similar first amendment protections.
Twitter, Facebook, Google would all be subject to this.
That is to say, any lawful media posted to Twitter, Facebook, Youtube should be generally available to any adult present in the United States who opts to view it.
Trust nothing these people say, only what they do.
Yea, ignoring things helps make them better...
Free market capitalism against monopolies? Forget it.
I agree that there is an enforcement problem of anti trust laws. Sure.
But realize that any competitor will be at a massive disadvantage re capital both financially and per their already existing user base. And that is before Big Tech can just copy the competitor, write a check and buy them up or censor them outright after their media alies smear them. That is insurmountable unless there is some huge technological change.
Boycotts don't work. Never have never will. Individuals don't have the ability to change things just with their consumer choices. There's a reason the left tries to ban things instead of boycotting them.
No apple or Microsoft? Guess I'll just live without a computer!
Congrats, weirdo.
Congrats on knowing all about me!
So you're saying that your phone is neither an Android phone nor an iPhone?
And you're on Linux?
Respect.
Out of curiosity, what phone do you have? I'd like a smartphone that does not ask me to create an account
Thank you. I'll definitely check it out, I'll probably buy a new phone soon.
What are you preparing? You're always preparing. Just go.
NOooooooooo............... NOT THE PROPOSAL !!!!
How could the do this?! A proposal?!?!?! Its just too....... proposey!
The Downfall of Big Tech is a big Opportunity for pedes to create new businesses.
Necessity is the mother of invention. Get to work and have a good time.
I'm working on 2 different projects in addition to a full-time job. There's other I eventually want to get to too. Match me or one-up.
Great news!!!
Meh. Proposals are weak. AG Barr is weak.
Perhaps this week Barr will "feel deeply troubled" by big tech's legal immunity.
Legal foundation has to be laid down first you know, unlike how Obama/Holder/Lynch did things.
Their way seems more effective. People get raided at 4am, they go to prison, their lives are ruined. We investigate until the statute of limitations expires and the perps write best selling books and teach harvard classes.
And FaceBlow just pays a few million then it's over.
Barr = All Bark / No Bite
They need to do like the EU, that can fine big corporations an absolutely outrageous amount.
For example if they fuck with the personal data of EU citizens they can get fined an insane 4% of the annual global turnover
That's a good point... And some of them have been fined heavily. Over here Google et al pays every Congressman so much money they're nothing but lapdogs.
Trump needs to create an EO that addresses this fiasco.
It's sad we are all so pessimistic but it's more sad that we have a right to be pessimistic. Still waiting for so much justice.
"sources say" I guess I'll wait...
Funny, Congress is very busy taking qualified immunity away from police who carry out there edicts. While insuring that they only give lip service about the great masters attempting to interfere with an election.
The Zuckerbot has foreseen this and wisely distanced itself from Twitter on the issue of fact checking and the like.
over here holding my breath
I'm getting tired of being patronized by the politicians I support.
Not sure why your getting down voted by zealots who don't believe in America first but rather if you don't agree with everything Trump's cabinet does then you are wrong. Mind blowing collectivist mindset.
Go for it, make them earn it every year. If they want the immunity they have to prove they are section 230 compliant. Else they can live and function like everyone else.
Good idea. Should have happened in 2017
Didn't they already do this?
No, you are just remembering the last time they looked into a proposal.
Yeah... Pretty much every other month.
I'd rather see that dumpster fire extinguished.
"rolling back" does not sound strong enough.
Hawley or Scott - we need a bill that allows certain career employees to be audited financially. We know large corporations have corrupted career employees. FOIA is usually limited. We should have the power to identify corruption.
I'll probably get some heat for this but Zuck is infinitely better than most of these guys. IMHO it would be smart to work with that but I doubt it'll happen.
And the House won't, so this is a waste of time.
Big Tech Reacts to This Proposal
Does congress have to vote ? Don’t hold your breath
This also inadvertently solves the lack of journalism in America which is a huge source for all of our woes today.
“Propose,” “thinking about,” “will discuss,” “in preliminary talks to,” “gathering information about,” “leaning towards,” “studying.” Our DOJ and our illustrious AG sure are amazing aren’t they folks? Being a conservative is about 6 months away from being a jailable offense in this country but our DOJ/AG and their crack team of pearl clutchers are hard at work making sure conservatism isn’t banned at least until Christmas.
EITHER CLEAR YOUR CABINET OF THE SWAMP OR I'M NOT COMING BACK. YOU LOOK WEAK AS FUCK.
Its not just a look
Fuck the DOJ and their proposals. Fuck Barr
Well you have like 4-5 months, if there is even a country left after that.
Empty words
Not sure why your getting down voted by zealots who don't believe in America first but rather if you don't agree with everything Trump's cabinet does then you are wrong. Mind blowing collectivist mindset.
They keep saying they’re taking on the guys and nothing happens
propose? propose? my ass
Stop proposing and just do it