4605
Comments (777)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
16
aconcernedtroll 16 points ago +17 / -1

Officers are very very rarely giving you a chance to explain your way out of a situation. They knew he was drunk the moment they smelled the alcohol in his car. The first question he asked, and any officer would ask in that situation is "How much have you had to drink tonight?" Pay attention closely. They don't ever ask, "did you have anything to drink" because the obvious answer to even an idiot is to say "no", instead they ask a question that puts the suspect in the frame of mind- "they already know I've been drinking so I'll try and say it was just one drink or two drinks" thinking that just one or two drinks means you can walk away. In reality, it doesn't matter how many drinks you say you've had, you just admitted to drinking. The officer continues asking him questions, not to let him go, they know they're not letting him go the minute they look up his rap sheet and find out he's violating parole. They ask the questions to get the guy comfortable and take his guard down. The drawn out interrogation is a very smart control tactic, get the guy to not be defensive and convince him he's only going to the station for the breathalyzer test. Unfortunately the dude had been to jail before and panicked the second they tried to cuff him.

You should never talk to police. They aren't there to give you a chance to explain things. They are giving you rope to hang yourself.

Obviously this isn't true of all police, I've seen officers bend over backwards to help idiots that probably should have spent a night in jail, but in general...don't talk to police.

2
Gingersmom2009 2 points ago +4 / -2

So what exactly should they have done? Slipped a citation under his wiper, called an ambulance and drove away?

6
aconcernedtroll 6 points ago +7 / -1

I'm not suggesting they did anything wrong. I'm just explaining to parent commenter that you don't simply "explain" your way out of a DUI. The more you talk the more evidence you stack up against yourself for the courts.

And the guy refused an ambulance. You can't force someone to take an ambulance. If they called an ambulance, the ambulance would have shown up asked him if he needed treatment, he'd deny, they'd leave, he'd get in his car and drive drunk. They probably wouldn't have arrested him if he'd been willing to accept an ambulance and a ride to the hospital.

You can't just let the guy walk away either though. I see a ton of people on reddit saying they should have just called him a cab or a relative to pick him up. Sure. Then when he decides he's good to drive a few hours and drinks later and he needs to get his car before it gets towed, then ends up killing someone- those cops are fucked.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
suckmycorona 1 point ago +3 / -2

Guilty until proven guilty.

3
suckmycorona 3 points ago +3 / -0

For the down vote. I believe in innocent until proven guilty and no unreasonable search and seizure

2
suckmycorona 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don’t votes for not being innocent until proven guilty

1
YoLLamaIsSoFat 1 point ago +1 / -0

Driving isn't a right, you play by their rules.