I am no longer calling them liberals or progressives, they are neither liberal nor progressive. Just like the democrats of the 20th century they are segregationists. The way they articulate may have changed, but a wolf in sheep's clothes is no sheep... it is still a wolf.
Comments (2)
sorted by:
Totally segregationists, good idea
I’m calling myself a preservationist. I’d like to see a hard stance taken on separation, at key places in society, if it’s a natural byproduct of a merit based system.
I don’t care what you think of my stance, but I’ll take it further and say there is no benefit to those willing to take a moral high ground. They will be stomped out like all other weak species. Expecting certain groups of people to become assimilated when we tolerate their hatred and physical violence is a lesson in futility. Diversity and across-the-board integration has put the white race and country on the edge of disappearing. De facto segregation to maintain our ability of taking the moral high ground is acceptable. The alternative is we allow our sympathies to bring about our literal downfall.
Preservation now, preservation forever.