2755
Comments (361)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
6
nrjk 6 points ago +6 / -0

Poor people eat shit food because they're generally too stupid to know how to not eat shit food.

IQ heritability is between 50-70%. I don't disagree about food, as it is the building blocks of our bodies.

The fact is, healthy food is cheaper per calorie/serving. Discipline, foresight, ability to process information are all correlated to IQ. Applying those things to a diet and passing that behavior to a kid would be a tangential factor of a high or low IQ.

4
247MAGA 4 points ago +4 / -0

I've estimates that its 80%+ inherited.

Stefan Molyneux on YouTube - his race and iq series, and gene wars series.

2
TedCruzAteABoogaloo 2 points ago +2 / -0

So how does a person figure out that they need to feed their child proper food when...

  • they themselves were raised on shit food and have a below average iq
  • they have no idea what the concept of IQ is and the fact that nutrition affects it
  • their family structure has been annihilated by democrats pushing welfare and encouraging single mother households
  • their culture places 0 merit on healthy food
  • they live in a "food desert" where the nearest grocery store with produce is an hour and 2 bus rides away

I'm not trying to be an apologist. I'm just pointing out that there are obvious reasons why IQ is directly related to nurture, not nature.

1
nrjk 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree and see all of your points.

My blackpilled point of view is that these things will never be fixed. Attempting to force diversity is a wastes of time and we nerd to let evolution take it's course.

Even addresssing the nurture element, black children adopted by white middle class parents show an improvment (IQ goes up to 93), but all races who are adopted and raised by white middle class parents show similar improvements. Basically, we're already what, 50,000 years into this whole thing? I don't see us throwing gibs and programs at an issue that has 50,000 aleeady baked in.

Tangentially, the same thing goes for the differences between the sexes. We're never going to have a place where women are the main competitors l, CEOs and are locked up in prisonat a rate of 13:1 that of men.

The Left's blindspot in this particular area of science will resultbin a never ending attempt to "fund evolution" that will go nowhere. The only real way for them to affect the change they desire would be for them to implement the most ruthless and brutal authoritarion state ever seen.

I'm just happy locking up and/or executing the most violent ones and listeneing to women whine.