75
posted ago by TheCrisp11 ago by TheCrisp11 +75 / -0

It is a choice to have a disbelief rather than a belief. But to say you don't have a belief is false.

Your conclusions about the world around you are then seen through the prism of what you have chosen to believe, and therefore will read and listen to those that also see through the chosen prism of belief, even though many different beliefs are looking at the same things.

To then claim truth in disbelief through the process of occam's razor with merely the same things that everyone is also observing is a falsehood, as the assumptions made rely on a foundation of lessons taught in the unprovable, unseeable beliefs in the same way other beliefs operate.

If we all have the same evidence of that which we can see, but no proof of how it came to be, our conclusions are then simply based on what we chose to believe before the evidence was presented. A faith in which our conclusion about what is unknown is correct.

To choose to disbelieve about a belief is still a chosen belief in disbelieving.

Comments (74)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-2
TheCrisp11 [S] -2 points ago +3 / -5

No, I'm not talking about why number theory works the way it does. I'm asking the question, where does math come from? I am not denying the observable.

But your other beliefs to that question stem from your choice of unbelief, which still leads to answers that are just as valid as having a different belief, as they all are unprovable.