It is a choice to have a disbelief rather than a belief. But to say you don't have a belief is false.
Your conclusions about the world around you are then seen through the prism of what you have chosen to believe, and therefore will read and listen to those that also see through the chosen prism of belief, even though many different beliefs are looking at the same things.
To then claim truth in disbelief through the process of occam's razor with merely the same things that everyone is also observing is a falsehood, as the assumptions made rely on a foundation of lessons taught in the unprovable, unseeable beliefs in the same way other beliefs operate.
If we all have the same evidence of that which we can see, but no proof of how it came to be, our conclusions are then simply based on what we chose to believe before the evidence was presented. A faith in which our conclusion about what is unknown is correct.
To choose to disbelieve about a belief is still a chosen belief in disbelieving.
So you have evidence or proof that when you die, if you believe in Jesus, you are automatically granted access to heaven?
Or, you have evidence or proof that when you die, if you don't believe in Jesus, you are automatically denied access to heaven?
If either of those or both are correct, please provide concrete proof other than something out of a book that has been re-written, by man's hand, countless times over the centuries.
If you can't provide proof or evidence.... neither of us are right, and both of us don't know WTF is going to happen to us when we die.
Well, Jesus was a real person. Whether or not you believe what He said is up to you.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/apr/14/what-is-the-historical-evidence-that-jesus-christ-lived-and-died
Sorry if I hurt your feelings, but I believe what Jesus said. Rather simple, I don't mind being downvoted.
Well, Jesus was a real man. There is my evidence. Do with that what you will, I have a hunch you have an unprovable explanation into why Jesus was wrong. Maybe you wish they had social media and the internet so they could document it better? Lol.
And if you honestly want to read the original Greek manuscripts and the oldest Hebrew manuscripts, be my guest. But you will find that they are not different in meaning from say the KJV or ESV translations of today.
Ponder for a second that God does exist and God wanted us to read something written by Himself. Would it be reasonable God would want it translated into a common language for us to read? If an important life-saving medical journal was written in French, or Japanese, wouldnt you agree it should be translated for more people to read it?
Prove it.
It is not popularly debated amoung historical scholars that he was a real person.
Here is a recent non-christian outlet speaking about the matter:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/apr/14/what-is-the-historical-evidence-that-jesus-christ-lived-and-died
But, I imagine your chosen teachers have taught you how to respond and think about everything.
I am merely trying to counter your assertions with mine.
You (as well as anybody) cannot prove it definitively.
That said, I am not going to say he did not exist, rather there is no proof either way.